California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 235 — Sales and use taxes: income taxes.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and law provides various exemptions from those taxes. The bill would exempt from those taxes, on and after January 1, 2014, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily in manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of property, as specified, qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor for specified purposes, as provided, and qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in research and development, as provided. The bill would require the purchaser to furnish the retailer with an exemption certificate, as specified. The bill would further limit the exemption for leases that are continuing sales or purchases to a six-year period. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in conformity with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes, transactions and use taxes, and specified state taxes from which revenues are deposited into the Local Public Safety Fund, the Education Protection Account, the Local Revenue Fund, the Fiscal Recovery Fund, or the Local Revenue Fund 2011. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. Both laws, in specified conformity to federal income tax laws, allow a credit for increasing research expenses, as defined. In general, the amount of the credit under both laws is equal to 15% of the excess of the qualified research expenses, as defined, for the taxable year over the base amount, as defined, and, in addition, for purposes of the Corporation Tax Law, 24% of the basic research payments, as defined. The term "base amount" means the product of the average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for each of the specified years preceding the taxable year and the fixed-base percentage, as defined, but in no event less than 50% of the qualified research expenses for the taxable year. A taxpayer may elect an alternative incremental credit for increasing research expenses in modified conformity to federal income tax laws. This bill would increase the credit for increasing research expenses to 20% of the excess of the qualified research expenses over the base amount. This bill would also provide complete conformity to the alternative incremental credit provided under those federal income tax laws. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize a credit for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, in an amount equal to $3,000, prorated as provided, for each full-time employee hired during the taxable year by an employer that employed a specified number of employees. Those laws contain a cut-off date for the credits based upon the estimated receipt of returns claiming credits for all taxable years of $400 million, and require those sections to be repealed as of a specified date. This bill would delete the requirement related to the number of employees employed by the employer and the specified cut-off date and repeal date. This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, also allow a credit under both laws in an amount equal to specified percentages of wages paid by a qualified employer taxpayer to a qualified employee. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow individual and corporate taxpayers to utilize net operating losses and carryovers and carrybacks of those losses for purposes of offsetting their individual and corporate tax liabilities. Existing law allows net operating losses attributable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, to be carrybacks to each of the preceding 2 taxable years, as provided. Existing law provides that for a net operating loss attributable to a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, and before January 1, 2015, the amount of carryback to any taxable year is not to exceed 75% of the net operating loss. This bill would instead provide that for a net operating loss attributable to a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the amount of carryback to any taxable year is not to exceed 100% of the net operating loss. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, authorize a taxpayer to depreciate property, determined by an applicable depreciation method, an applicable recovery period, and an applicable convention. This bill would reduce the applicable recovery period for property placed into service on and after January 1, 2014, to 12 of the applicable recovery period set forth in existing federal income tax laws or state laws. This bill would, at the election of the taxpayer, reduce the applicable recovery period for property placed into service before January 1, 2014, to 12 of the applicable recovery period set forth in existing federal income tax laws or state laws. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law provide that gain or loss upon the disposition of a capital asset is determined by reference to the specified adjusted basis of that asset. This bill would provide under both laws that the gross income of a taxpayer does not include any gain from the sale or exchange of any capital asset. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  4. Set for hearing May 15.

  5. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  7. Set for hearing May 8.

  8. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  9. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.

  10. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Huff · Cosponsor
  • Walters · Cosponsor
  • Wyland · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Wyland

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Huff
  • Walters

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

taxation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 235 do?
Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and law provides various exemptions from those taxes. The bill would exempt from those taxes, on and after January 1, 2014, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily in manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of property, as specified, qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor for specified purposes, as provided, and qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in research and development, as provided. The bill would require the purchaser to furnish the retailer with an exemption certificate, as specified. The bill would further limit the exemption for leases that are continuing sales or purchases to a six-year period. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in conformity with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes, transactions and use taxes, and specified state taxes from which revenues are deposited into the Local Public Safety Fund, the Education Protection Account, the Local Revenue Fund, the Fiscal Recovery Fund, or the Local Revenue Fund 2011. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. Both laws, in specified conformity to federal income tax laws, allow a credit for increasing research expenses, as defined. In general, the amount of the credit under both laws is equal to 15% of the excess of the qualified research expenses, as defined, for the taxable year over the base amount, as defined, and, in addition, for purposes of the Corporation Tax Law, 24% of the basic research payments, as defined. The term "base amount" means the product of the average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for each of the specified years preceding the taxable year and the fixed-base percentage, as defined, but in no event less than 50% of the qualified research expenses for the taxable year. A taxpayer may elect an alternative incremental credit for increasing research expenses in modified conformity to federal income tax laws. This bill would increase the credit for increasing research expenses to 20% of the excess of the qualified research expenses over the base amount. This bill would also provide complete conformity to the alternative incremental credit provided under those federal income tax laws. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize a credit for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, in an amount equal to $3,000, prorated as provided, for each full-time employee hired during the taxable year by an employer that employed a specified number of employees. Those laws contain a cut-off date for the credits based upon the estimated receipt of returns claiming credits for all taxable years of $400 million, and require those sections to be repealed as of a specified date. This bill would delete the requirement related to the number of employees employed by the employer and the specified cut-off date and repeal date. This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, also allow a credit under both laws in an amount equal to specified percentages of wages paid by a qualified employer taxpayer to a qualified employee. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow individual and corporate taxpayers to utilize net operating losses and carryovers and carrybacks of those losses for purposes of offsetting their individual and corporate tax liabilities. Existing law allows net operating losses attributable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, to be carrybacks to each of the preceding 2 taxable years, as provided. Existing law provides that for a net operating loss attributable to a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, and before January 1, 2015, the amount of carryback to any taxable year is not to exceed 75% of the net operating loss. This bill would instead provide that for a net operating loss attributable to a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the amount of carryback to any taxable year is not to exceed 100% of the net operating loss. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, authorize a taxpayer to depreciate property, determined by an applicable depreciation method, an applicable recovery period, and an applicable convention. This bill would reduce the applicable recovery period for property placed into service on and after January 1, 2014, to 12 of the applicable recovery period set forth in existing federal income tax laws or state laws. This bill would, at the election of the taxpayer, reduce the applicable recovery period for property placed into service before January 1, 2014, to 12 of the applicable recovery period set forth in existing federal income tax laws or state laws. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law provide that gain or loss upon the disposition of a capital asset is determined by reference to the specified adjusted basis of that asset. This bill would provide under both laws that the gross income of a taxpayer does not include any gain from the sale or exchange of any capital asset. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Who sponsors SB 235?
SB 235 is sponsored by Huff, Walters, and Wyland.
What is the current status of SB 235?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 235?
Track SB 235 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 235

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 235

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →