AB 2550 — Election dates.
Last action — From committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes election dates in each year, which are the second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each odd-numbered year, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each year, and the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year. Existing law requires all state, county, municipal, district, and school district elections to be held on an established election date, except for a special election called by the Governor, an election held in a chartered city or chartered county, certain school district elections, a local ballot measure or local recall election, and an all-mailed ballot election. Existing law also requires a state, county, municipal, district, and school district election held on a statewide election date to be consolidated with the statewide election; however, the board of supervisors of a county of the first class may deny a request for consolidation under certain circumstances. This bill would require general municipal and general district elections held on or after July 1, 2015, to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June of even-numbered years, or on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd-numbered or even-numbered year, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would provide that these provisions may not be construed to shorten the term of office of any officeholder, as specified, or as altering the date of an election held in a district if the principal act of the district provides for a runoff election. This bill would also provide that, if a board of supervisors of a county of the first class denies a request to consolidate an election, that election shall not be held on the date of the statewide election. By increasing the duties of local elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/29/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 29, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2550 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 22).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Roger Hernández · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2550 do?
- Existing law establishes election dates in each year, which are the second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each odd-numbered year, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each year, and the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year. Existing law requires all state, county, municipal, district, and school district elections to be held on an established election date, except for a special election called by the Governor, an election held in a chartered city or chartered county, certain school district elections, a local ballot measure or local recall election, and an all-mailed ballot election. Existing law also requires a state, county, municipal, district, and school district election held on a statewide election date to be consolidated with the statewide election; however, the board of supervisors of a county of the first class may deny a request for consolidation under certain circumstances. This bill would require general municipal and general district elections held on or after July 1, 2015, to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June of even-numbered years, or on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd-numbered or even-numbered year, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would provide that these provisions may not be construed to shorten the term of office of any officeholder, as specified, or as altering the date of an election held in a district if the principal act of the district provides for a runoff election. This bill would also provide that, if a board of supervisors of a county of the first class denies a request to consolidate an election, that election shall not be held on the date of the statewide election. By increasing the duties of local elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 2550?
- AB 2550 is sponsored by Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 2550?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2550?
- Track AB 2550 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2550
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2550
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →