California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 125 — Water: floods.

Last action — Died on unfinished business file, concurrence pending.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law prohibits a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or other discretionary entitlement, or a ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence, for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, unless the city or county finds, based on substantial evidence in the record, that certain criteria is met. This bill would prohibit a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or entitlement that would result in the construction of a new building or construction that would result in an increase in allowed occupancy for an existing building for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone unless the city or county finds that the construction meets the criteria referenced above. Existing law authorizes the Department of Water Resources to administer funding, from various sources, for flood risk reduction projects. This bill would authorize the Department of Water Resources to provide reimbursement to funding recipients that execute a funding agreement under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction Projects program for expenditures associated with continued funding of a project initiated under the Early Implementation Project program and incurred after July 1, 2014, and before the execution of the funding agreement, but no later than July 1, 2015. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on unfinished business file, concurrence pending.

  2. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  3. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 5006.).

  4. Ordered to third reading.

  5. Withdrawn from committee.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Page 5002.)

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Ordered to second reading.

  13. From inactive file.

  14. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Walters.

  15. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  18. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  21. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  22. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 1729.)

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).

  26. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  27. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  29. From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.

  30. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Eggman · Primary
  • Logue · Cosponsor
  • Nielsen · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Eggman

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Logue
  • Nielsen

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Supp 7 AB125 Eggman By Nielsen Urgency Clause

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Democratic 2001
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
De León — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 125 WIECKOWSKI Assembly Third Reading

Passed 75 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 65102
Democratic 7000
Republican 3001
Total 75103
% of votes cast 95%1%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chau — Yea
Conway — Yea
Campos — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 125 do?
Existing law prohibits a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or other discretionary entitlement, or a ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence, for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, unless the city or county finds, based on substantial evidence in the record, that certain criteria is met. This bill would prohibit a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley from approving a discretionary permit or entitlement that would result in the construction of a new building or construction that would result in an increase in allowed occupancy for an existing building for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone unless the city or county finds that the construction meets the criteria referenced above. Existing law authorizes the Department of Water Resources to administer funding, from various sources, for flood risk reduction projects. This bill would authorize the Department of Water Resources to provide reimbursement to funding recipients that execute a funding agreement under the Urban Flood Risk Reduction Projects program for expenditures associated with continued funding of a project initiated under the Early Implementation Project program and incurred after July 1, 2014, and before the execution of the funding agreement, but no later than July 1, 2015. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 125?
AB 125 is sponsored by Eggman, Logue, and Nielsen.
What is the current status of AB 125?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 125?
Track AB 125 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 125

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 125

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →