California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 75 — Alcohol and drug programs.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 22, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. Existing law provides that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. Existing law also provides that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. This bill would, on July 1, 2013, transfer the administration of prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse to the State Department of Health Care Services and services for problem gambling to the State Department of Public Health, and would make related changes. The bill would require, by April 1, 2014, and March 1 annually thereafter, until July 1, 2018, the State Department of Health Care Services and the State Department of Public Health to make specified reports on the substance use disorders services program, as provided, and on the Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling, as provided, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the appropriate budget subcommittees and policy committees of the Legislature, and publicly post their reports on their respective Internet Web sites. Existing law imposes certain requirements on the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs and on the Judicial Council relating to the design and implementation of specified drug court programs. Existing law also requires the department to establish community-based recovery programs to treat the problems of alcohol and other drug use among youth, as specified, and to develop and implement a statewide prevention campaign designed to deter the abuse of methamphetamine in California. Existing law authorizes the department to implement a program for the establishment of group homes for alcohol and other drug abusers, and to establish the Resident-Run Housing Revolving Fund for the purpose of making loans to group resident-run homes in conformance with federal law. This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2013. Existing law requires a county that applies for funds to provide alcohol and other drug abuse to prepare and submit a contract for alcohol and other drug abuse services to the department. Under existing law, net negotiated amount contracts that are in effect on June 27, 2012, are deemed contracts for alcohol and other drug abuse services for purposes of a county's application for these funds. This bill would delete the provision deeming net negotiated amount contracts to be contracts for alcohol and other drug abuse services. This bill would appropriate the sum of $2,004,000 from the Federal Trust Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for mental health programs. The bill would make further technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 22, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. Enrolled measure version corrected.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 68. Noes 9. Page 2000.).

  6. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 25. Page 1998.)

  7. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 25. Page 1998.)

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1363.).

  10. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1363.)

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. (Ayes 23. Noes 9. Page 1337.)

  13. Withdrawn from committee.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  15. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1390.)

  18. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)

  21. Ordered to second reading.

  22. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1312.)

  23. Withdrawn from committee.

  24. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading AB75 Committee on BUDGET (Blumenfield) By Leno

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 3000
Total 38001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Wright — Yea
Evans — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Beall — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 75 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 68 Yea · 9 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 61601
Democratic 6100
Republican 1201
Total 68902
% of votes cast 86%11%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

AB 75 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 51 Yea · 24 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452003
Democratic 6001
Republican 0400
Total 512404
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Torres — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 75 do?
Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. Existing law provides that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. Existing law also provides that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. This bill would, on July 1, 2013, transfer the administration of prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse to the State Department of Health Care Services and services for problem gambling to the State Department of Public Health, and would make related changes. The bill would require, by April 1, 2014, and March 1 annually thereafter, until July 1, 2018, the State Department of Health Care Services and the State Department of Public Health to make specified reports on the substance use disorders services program, as provided, and on the Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling, as provided, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the appropriate budget subcommittees and policy committees of the Legislature, and publicly post their reports on their respective Internet Web sites. Existing law imposes certain requirements on the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs and on the Judicial Council relating to the design and implementation of specified drug court programs. Existing law also requires the department to establish community-based recovery programs to treat the problems of alcohol and other drug use among youth, as specified, and to develop and implement a statewide prevention campaign designed to deter the abuse of methamphetamine in California. Existing law authorizes the department to implement a program for the establishment of group homes for alcohol and other drug abusers, and to establish the Resident-Run Housing Revolving Fund for the purpose of making loans to group resident-run homes in conformance with federal law. This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2013. Existing law requires a county that applies for funds to provide alcohol and other drug abuse to prepare and submit a contract for alcohol and other drug abuse services to the department. Under existing law, net negotiated amount contracts that are in effect on June 27, 2012, are deemed contracts for alcohol and other drug abuse services for purposes of a county's application for these funds. This bill would delete the provision deeming net negotiated amount contracts to be contracts for alcohol and other drug abuse services. This bill would appropriate the sum of $2,004,000 from the Federal Trust Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for mental health programs. The bill would make further technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 75?
AB 75 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 75?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 75?
Track AB 75 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 75

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 75

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →