AB 1004 — Criminal procedure.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 460, Statutes of 2013.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires that a declaration in support of the warrant of probable cause for arrest be a sworn statement made in writing. Existing law also authorizes the magistrate to take an oral statement under oath under specified conditions that provide for the use of facsimile transmission equipment or electronic mail if prescribed conditions are met, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of the declarant's digital signature. This bill would specify that the declaration may be by telephone and computer server and that the signature may be an electronic signature, and would make conforming changes. Existing law requires the magistrate to print related electronic documents and sign the warrant if the warrant is granted. This bill would require, if the documents are received by electronic mail or computer server, that these documents be subsequently printed and would specify that the magistrate's signature may be in the form of a digital signature or an electronic signature.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/01/13 - Chaptered Current pdf October 01, 2013
- Enrolled 09/12/13 - Enrolled pdf September 12, 2013
- Amended 05/15/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 15, 2013
- Amended 03/21/13 - Amended Assembly pdf March 21, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- AB1004 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 460, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2229.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1576.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Gray · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gray
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1004 do?
- Existing law requires that a declaration in support of the warrant of probable cause for arrest be a sworn statement made in writing. Existing law also authorizes the magistrate to take an oral statement under oath under specified conditions that provide for the use of facsimile transmission equipment or electronic mail if prescribed conditions are met, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of the declarant's digital signature. This bill would specify that the declaration may be by telephone and computer server and that the signature may be an electronic signature, and would make conforming changes. Existing law requires the magistrate to print related electronic documents and sign the warrant if the warrant is granted. This bill would require, if the documents are received by electronic mail or computer server, that these documents be subsequently printed and would specify that the magistrate's signature may be in the form of a digital signature or an electronic signature.
- Who sponsors AB 1004?
- AB 1004 is sponsored by Gray.
- What is the current status of AB 1004?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1004?
- Track AB 1004 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1004
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1004
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →