SB 602 — Child abuse prevention, intervention, and treatment projects.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 60, Statutes of 2013.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law allows the Office of Child Abuse Prevention to fund, through allocations provided to local counties, child abuse and neglect prevention and intervention programs. Existing law provides the criteria under which a county selects agency projects and services to be funded under these provisions, including that priority shall be given to private, nonprofit agencies and that training and technical assistance shall be provided by private, nonprofit agencies, as specified. Existing law requires funds allocated to a county to revert to the State Children's Trust Fund and be administered, as provided, if that county chooses not to contract or subcontract for the provision of services. This bill would remove required training and technical assistance by private, nonprofit agencies as a selection criteria. This bill would also remove the requirement that funds allocated to a county that chooses not to contract or subcontract for the provision of services revert to the State Children's Trust Fund. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/03/13 - Chaptered Current pdf July 03, 2013
- Enrolled 06/26/13 - Enrolled pdf June 26, 2013
- Amended 04/11/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 11, 2013
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB602 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 60, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2151.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 18).
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 579.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 486.) (April 9).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
Set for hearing April 9.
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Human Services · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Human Services
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 602 do?
- Existing law allows the Office of Child Abuse Prevention to fund, through allocations provided to local counties, child abuse and neglect prevention and intervention programs. Existing law provides the criteria under which a county selects agency projects and services to be funded under these provisions, including that priority shall be given to private, nonprofit agencies and that training and technical assistance shall be provided by private, nonprofit agencies, as specified. Existing law requires funds allocated to a county to revert to the State Children's Trust Fund and be administered, as provided, if that county chooses not to contract or subcontract for the provision of services. This bill would remove required training and technical assistance by private, nonprofit agencies as a selection criteria. This bill would also remove the requirement that funds allocated to a county that chooses not to contract or subcontract for the provision of services revert to the State Children's Trust Fund. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 602?
- SB 602 is sponsored by Committee on Human Services.
- What is the current status of SB 602?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 602?
- Track SB 602 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 602
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 602
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →