California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1871 — Agricultural products: direct marketing: certified farmers' markets.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 579, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the establishment of standards for various agricultural products, including fruits, nuts, and vegetables, and authorizes the use of the term "California grown" and similar terms for marketing, advertising, or promotional purposes only to identify food or agricultural products that have been produced in the state or harvested in its surface or coastal waters, and makes the fraudulent use of the term or a deliberately misleading or unwarranted use of the term a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $3,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make it unlawful for any person or entity, or employee or agent of that person or entity, to make any statement, representation, or assertion relating to the sale or availability of agricultural products that is false, deceptive, or misleading, as specified, and would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or both the fine and imprisonment. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or a county agricultural commissioner, in lieu of prosecution, to levy a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would make those penalties applicable to the fraudulent use of the term "California grown," as specified above. The bill would require the civil penalties collected by a county agricultural commissioner to be paid to the county treasurer, and would require civil penalties collected by the secretary to be deposited in the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account, which would be created in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, as continuously appropriated funds to be used to conduct investigations and enforcement actions relating to false, deceptive, or misleading statements relating to agricultural products, and for other specified purposes. By establishing a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (2) Existing law regulates the direct marketing of agricultural products, and authorizes the secretary to adopt regulations in that regard. This bill would define the terms "producer," "practice of agricultural arts," and "agricultural product" for purposes of the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize the secretary to enter into a cooperative agreement with any county agricultural commissioner for purposes relating to the direct marketing of agricultural products, and would require compensation to be paid under those cooperative agreements from moneys derived from assessments and fees collected pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize a certified farmers' market operator to contract with a county agricultural commissioner for verification inspections, as specified. (3) Existing law specifies that certified farmers' markets are locations established in accordance with local ordinances, and requires the governing body of a certified farmers' market with more than one participating certified producer to adopt written rules and procedures pertaining to the operation of the certified farmers' market. This bill would instead provide that certified farmers' markets are California agricultural product point of sale locations that are registered and operated in accordance with specified provisions of law. The bill would require vendors of agricultural products selling within a certified farmers' market to comply with specified signage and labeling requirements, and would make those representations subject to criminal, civil, and administrative penalties, as specified. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal provisions authorizing an aggrieved certified producer to submit a request to the Department of Food and Agriculture for an advisory opinion, and for the department to issue the advisory opinion, and would repeal provisions requiring the department to provide for an informal hearing process for grievances relating to certified farmers' markets. (4) Existing law requires the secretary to establish the Certified Farmers' Market Advisory Committee, composed of 17 members serving 2-year terms, to advise the secretary on matters relating to direct marketing and certified farmers' markets. This bill would revise the primary goals of the committee and the matters on which the committee may make recommendations to the secretary. The bill would decrease the number of members on the committee from 17 members to 14 members, and would specify that members of the committee serve for 2-year terms or at the pleasure of the secretary. (5) Existing law specifies that a certified farmers' market certificate or a certified producer's certificate obtained from a county agricultural commissioner is valid for 12 months and requires a county agricultural commissioner to inspect certified farmers' markets and the properties of certified producers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county agricultural commissioner to charge a certification and inspection fee of up to $60 per hour, except as specified. This bill would instead require a certified farmers' market operator or producer to annually register with the department by applying for and receiving a certificate from a county agricultural commissioner, and would revise the requirements for obtaining that certificate. (6) Existing law requires, until January 1, 2018, that an operator of a certified farmers' market remit to the department a fee, as established by the department each year, equal to the number of certified producer certificates and other agricultural producers participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter, to be deposited in the Food and Agriculture Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used by the department for specified purposes. This bill would instead require a fee of $2 for each vendor participating and selling goods under the authority and management of the certified farmers' market operator participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter to be remitted to the department. The bill would authorize operators of certified farmers' markets meeting specified requirement to petition the secretary for a vendor fee of $1. The bill would revise the purposes for which the fees may be used, including, among other things, for investigation and enforcement expenses, including expenses incurred by county agricultural commissioners for actions conducted pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. (7) Because the bill would create new crimes, and by imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 579, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 2. Page 6383.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 4712.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 4).

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17).

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  15. Referred to Com. on AGRI.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 5. Page 5348.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).

  21. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Referred to Com. on AGRI.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Dickinson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Dickinson

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 75 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68202
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 75202
% of votes cast 95%3%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Conway — Yea
Allen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Perea — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33103
Democratic 2001
Total 35104
% of votes cast 88%3%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Knight — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Correa — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 71 Yea · 5 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 65403
Democratic 4000
Republican 2100
Total 71503
% of votes cast 90%6%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Linder — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chau — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11004
Democratic 1000
Republican 0001
Total 12005
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Donnelly — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1871 do?
(1) Existing law provides for the establishment of standards for various agricultural products, including fruits, nuts, and vegetables, and authorizes the use of the term "California grown" and similar terms for marketing, advertising, or promotional purposes only to identify food or agricultural products that have been produced in the state or harvested in its surface or coastal waters, and makes the fraudulent use of the term or a deliberately misleading or unwarranted use of the term a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $3,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make it unlawful for any person or entity, or employee or agent of that person or entity, to make any statement, representation, or assertion relating to the sale or availability of agricultural products that is false, deceptive, or misleading, as specified, and would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or both the fine and imprisonment. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or a county agricultural commissioner, in lieu of prosecution, to levy a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would make those penalties applicable to the fraudulent use of the term "California grown," as specified above. The bill would require the civil penalties collected by a county agricultural commissioner to be paid to the county treasurer, and would require civil penalties collected by the secretary to be deposited in the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account, which would be created in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, as continuously appropriated funds to be used to conduct investigations and enforcement actions relating to false, deceptive, or misleading statements relating to agricultural products, and for other specified purposes. By establishing a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (2) Existing law regulates the direct marketing of agricultural products, and authorizes the secretary to adopt regulations in that regard. This bill would define the terms "producer," "practice of agricultural arts," and "agricultural product" for purposes of the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize the secretary to enter into a cooperative agreement with any county agricultural commissioner for purposes relating to the direct marketing of agricultural products, and would require compensation to be paid under those cooperative agreements from moneys derived from assessments and fees collected pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize a certified farmers' market operator to contract with a county agricultural commissioner for verification inspections, as specified. (3) Existing law specifies that certified farmers' markets are locations established in accordance with local ordinances, and requires the governing body of a certified farmers' market with more than one participating certified producer to adopt written rules and procedures pertaining to the operation of the certified farmers' market. This bill would instead provide that certified farmers' markets are California agricultural product point of sale locations that are registered and operated in accordance with specified provisions of law. The bill would require vendors of agricultural products selling within a certified farmers' market to comply with specified signage and labeling requirements, and would make those representations subject to criminal, civil, and administrative penalties, as specified. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal provisions authorizing an aggrieved certified producer to submit a request to the Department of Food and Agriculture for an advisory opinion, and for the department to issue the advisory opinion, and would repeal provisions requiring the department to provide for an informal hearing process for grievances relating to certified farmers' markets. (4) Existing law requires the secretary to establish the Certified Farmers' Market Advisory Committee, composed of 17 members serving 2-year terms, to advise the secretary on matters relating to direct marketing and certified farmers' markets. This bill would revise the primary goals of the committee and the matters on which the committee may make recommendations to the secretary. The bill would decrease the number of members on the committee from 17 members to 14 members, and would specify that members of the committee serve for 2-year terms or at the pleasure of the secretary. (5) Existing law specifies that a certified farmers' market certificate or a certified producer's certificate obtained from a county agricultural commissioner is valid for 12 months and requires a county agricultural commissioner to inspect certified farmers' markets and the properties of certified producers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county agricultural commissioner to charge a certification and inspection fee of up to $60 per hour, except as specified. This bill would instead require a certified farmers' market operator or producer to annually register with the department by applying for and receiving a certificate from a county agricultural commissioner, and would revise the requirements for obtaining that certificate. (6) Existing law requires, until January 1, 2018, that an operator of a certified farmers' market remit to the department a fee, as established by the department each year, equal to the number of certified producer certificates and other agricultural producers participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter, to be deposited in the Food and Agriculture Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used by the department for specified purposes. This bill would instead require a fee of $2 for each vendor participating and selling goods under the authority and management of the certified farmers' market operator participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter to be remitted to the department. The bill would authorize operators of certified farmers' markets meeting specified requirement to petition the secretary for a vendor fee of $1. The bill would revise the purposes for which the fees may be used, including, among other things, for investigation and enforcement expenses, including expenses incurred by county agricultural commissioners for actions conducted pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. (7) Because the bill would create new crimes, and by imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 1871?
AB 1871 is sponsored by Dickinson.
What is the current status of AB 1871?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1871?
Track AB 1871 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1871

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1871

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →