Agricultural products: direct marketing: certified farmers' markets.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1871 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1871.
You're tracking AB 1871
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1871 — Agricultural products: direct marketing: certified farmers' markets.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 579, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the establishment of standards for various agricultural products, including fruits, nuts, and vegetables, and authorizes the use of the term "California grown" and similar terms for marketing, advertising, or promotional purposes only to identify food or agricultural products that have been produced in the state or harvested in its surface or coastal waters, and makes the fraudulent use of the term or a deliberately misleading or unwarranted use of the term a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $3,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make it unlawful for any person or entity, or employee or agent of that person or entity, to make any statement, representation, or assertion relating to the sale or availability of agricultural products that is false, deceptive, or misleading, as specified, and would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or both the fine and imprisonment. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or a county agricultural commissioner, in lieu of prosecution, to levy a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would make those penalties applicable to the fraudulent use of the term "California grown," as specified above. The bill would require the civil penalties collected by a county agricultural commissioner to be paid to the county treasurer, and would require civil penalties collected by the secretary to be deposited in the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account, which would be created in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, as continuously appropriated funds to be used to conduct investigations and enforcement actions relating to false, deceptive, or misleading statements relating to agricultural products, and for other specified purposes. By establishing a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (2) Existing law regulates the direct marketing of agricultural products, and authorizes the secretary to adopt regulations in that regard. This bill would define the terms "producer," "practice of agricultural arts," and "agricultural product" for purposes of the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize the secretary to enter into a cooperative agreement with any county agricultural commissioner for purposes relating to the direct marketing of agricultural products, and would require compensation to be paid under those cooperative agreements from moneys derived from assessments and fees collected pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize a certified farmers' market operator to contract with a county agricultural commissioner for verification inspections, as specified. (3) Existing law specifies that certified farmers' markets are locations established in accordance with local ordinances, and requires the governing body of a certified farmers' market with more than one participating certified producer to adopt written rules and procedures pertaining to the operation of the certified farmers' market. This bill would instead provide that certified farmers' markets are California agricultural product point of sale locations that are registered and operated in accordance with specified provisions of law. The bill would require vendors of agricultural products selling within a certified farmers' market to comply with specified signage and labeling requirements, and would make those representations subject to criminal, civil, and administrative penalties, as specified. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal provisions authorizing an aggrieved certified producer to submit a request to the Department of Food and Agriculture for an advisory opinion, and for the department to issue the advisory opinion, and would repeal provisions requiring the department to provide for an informal hearing process for grievances relating to certified farmers' markets. (4) Existing law requires the secretary to establish the Certified Farmers' Market Advisory Committee, composed of 17 members serving 2-year terms, to advise the secretary on matters relating to direct marketing and certified farmers' markets. This bill would revise the primary goals of the committee and the matters on which the committee may make recommendations to the secretary. The bill would decrease the number of members on the committee from 17 members to 14 members, and would specify that members of the committee serve for 2-year terms or at the pleasure of the secretary. (5) Existing law specifies that a certified farmers' market certificate or a certified producer's certificate obtained from a county agricultural commissioner is valid for 12 months and requires a county agricultural commissioner to inspect certified farmers' markets and the properties of certified producers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county agricultural commissioner to charge a certification and inspection fee of up to $60 per hour, except as specified. This bill would instead require a certified farmers' market operator or producer to annually register with the department by applying for and receiving a certificate from a county agricultural commissioner, and would revise the requirements for obtaining that certificate. (6) Existing law requires, until January 1, 2018, that an operator of a certified farmers' market remit to the department a fee, as established by the department each year, equal to the number of certified producer certificates and other agricultural producers participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter, to be deposited in the Food and Agriculture Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used by the department for specified purposes. This bill would instead require a fee of $2 for each vendor participating and selling goods under the authority and management of the certified farmers' market operator participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter to be remitted to the department. The bill would authorize operators of certified farmers' markets meeting specified requirement to petition the secretary for a vendor fee of $1. The bill would revise the purposes for which the fees may be used, including, among other things, for investigation and enforcement expenses, including expenses incurred by county agricultural commissioners for actions conducted pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. (7) Because the bill would create new crimes, and by imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/26/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2014
- Enrolled 08/27/14 - Enrolled pdf August 27, 2014
- Amended 08/19/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 19, 2014
- Amended 08/04/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 04, 2014
- Amended 06/30/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 30, 2014
- Amended 06/11/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 11, 2014
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 23, 2014
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
- AB1871 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 579, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 2. Page 6383.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 4712.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 4).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 5. Page 5348.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Dickinson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dickinson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 71 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 6% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1871 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the establishment of standards for various agricultural products, including fruits, nuts, and vegetables, and authorizes the use of the term "California grown" and similar terms for marketing, advertising, or promotional purposes only to identify food or agricultural products that have been produced in the state or harvested in its surface or coastal waters, and makes the fraudulent use of the term or a deliberately misleading or unwarranted use of the term a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $3,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make it unlawful for any person or entity, or employee or agent of that person or entity, to make any statement, representation, or assertion relating to the sale or availability of agricultural products that is false, deceptive, or misleading, as specified, and would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or both the fine and imprisonment. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or a county agricultural commissioner, in lieu of prosecution, to levy a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would make those penalties applicable to the fraudulent use of the term "California grown," as specified above. The bill would require the civil penalties collected by a county agricultural commissioner to be paid to the county treasurer, and would require civil penalties collected by the secretary to be deposited in the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account, which would be created in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, as continuously appropriated funds to be used to conduct investigations and enforcement actions relating to false, deceptive, or misleading statements relating to agricultural products, and for other specified purposes. By establishing a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (2) Existing law regulates the direct marketing of agricultural products, and authorizes the secretary to adopt regulations in that regard. This bill would define the terms "producer," "practice of agricultural arts," and "agricultural product" for purposes of the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize the secretary to enter into a cooperative agreement with any county agricultural commissioner for purposes relating to the direct marketing of agricultural products, and would require compensation to be paid under those cooperative agreements from moneys derived from assessments and fees collected pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize a certified farmers' market operator to contract with a county agricultural commissioner for verification inspections, as specified. (3) Existing law specifies that certified farmers' markets are locations established in accordance with local ordinances, and requires the governing body of a certified farmers' market with more than one participating certified producer to adopt written rules and procedures pertaining to the operation of the certified farmers' market. This bill would instead provide that certified farmers' markets are California agricultural product point of sale locations that are registered and operated in accordance with specified provisions of law. The bill would require vendors of agricultural products selling within a certified farmers' market to comply with specified signage and labeling requirements, and would make those representations subject to criminal, civil, and administrative penalties, as specified. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal provisions authorizing an aggrieved certified producer to submit a request to the Department of Food and Agriculture for an advisory opinion, and for the department to issue the advisory opinion, and would repeal provisions requiring the department to provide for an informal hearing process for grievances relating to certified farmers' markets. (4) Existing law requires the secretary to establish the Certified Farmers' Market Advisory Committee, composed of 17 members serving 2-year terms, to advise the secretary on matters relating to direct marketing and certified farmers' markets. This bill would revise the primary goals of the committee and the matters on which the committee may make recommendations to the secretary. The bill would decrease the number of members on the committee from 17 members to 14 members, and would specify that members of the committee serve for 2-year terms or at the pleasure of the secretary. (5) Existing law specifies that a certified farmers' market certificate or a certified producer's certificate obtained from a county agricultural commissioner is valid for 12 months and requires a county agricultural commissioner to inspect certified farmers' markets and the properties of certified producers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county agricultural commissioner to charge a certification and inspection fee of up to $60 per hour, except as specified. This bill would instead require a certified farmers' market operator or producer to annually register with the department by applying for and receiving a certificate from a county agricultural commissioner, and would revise the requirements for obtaining that certificate. (6) Existing law requires, until January 1, 2018, that an operator of a certified farmers' market remit to the department a fee, as established by the department each year, equal to the number of certified producer certificates and other agricultural producers participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter, to be deposited in the Food and Agriculture Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used by the department for specified purposes. This bill would instead require a fee of $2 for each vendor participating and selling goods under the authority and management of the certified farmers' market operator participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter to be remitted to the department. The bill would authorize operators of certified farmers' markets meeting specified requirement to petition the secretary for a vendor fee of $1. The bill would revise the purposes for which the fees may be used, including, among other things, for investigation and enforcement expenses, including expenses incurred by county agricultural commissioners for actions conducted pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. (7) Because the bill would create new crimes, and by imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 1871?
- AB 1871 is sponsored by Dickinson.
- What is the current status of AB 1871?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1871?
- Track AB 1871 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1871
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1871
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →