California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2451 — Weights and measures: water submeters.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 539, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the sealer of a county to inspect and test weighing and measuring devices, as specified, that are used or sold for commercial purposes in the county. Existing law, until January 1, 2016, authorizes the county board of supervisors to charge fees to recover the costs of the county sealer to perform these duties. For marinas, mobilehome parks, recreational vehicle parks, and apartment complexes, where the owner is responsible for the utility meters, existing law prohibits the device fee for water submeters from exceeding $2 per device per space or apartment. This bill would require a county sealer who possesses the appropriate equipment for performing tests on water submeters to inspect, test, and certify to the accuracy of a water submeter, upon request of the owner, user, or operator of the water submeter, if any of specified conditions exist. By placing additional duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would permit the board of supervisors of the county to authorize the sealer to establish a schedule of fees to cover the costs of performing those services. This bill would authorize, upon written request of the owner, user, or operator, a water submeter that has been inspected, tested, and sealed by a sealer in one county to be installed in another county if certain conditions are met, including that the sealer of the county in which the water submeter is to be installed does not have reason to believe that the water submeter has been tampered with, damaged, or otherwise rendered inoperable since its inspection, testing, and sealing. (2) Existing law requires a sealer to seize and condemn, and authorizes the sealer to destroy, incorrect weights and measures and weighing and measuring instruments used for commercial purposes that are not susceptible of repair. Existing law requires a sealer to mark incorrect devices, that are susceptible of repair, with a tag or other device with the words "Out of order." For these purposes, existing law defines "incorrect" as any instrument that fails to meet prescribed tolerances and specifications and other technical requirements for commercial weighing and measuring. This bill would require a water submeter, that has been tested and found to be incorrect before its initial installation, to be marked with the words "Out of order" and to be returned to a service agent only if certain conditions are met. Because the bill would impose additional duties on county sealers and because a violation of this provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would further specify that an owner, user, or operator of a water submeter that has previously been sealed, installed, and used commercially who submits the water submeter to a sealer for inspection and testing shall not be subject to criminal prosecution or liable for fines or other penalties for a violation of specified provisions regulating weights and measures if the device is found to be incorrect, if prescribed conditions apply. (3) Existing law regulates the utilization and repair of weighing or measuring devices. Under existing law, for purposes of weighing and measuring devices, the term "placed in service" means to permit the use of a device that has been tested and found to be correct, as specified, and type approved, as provided, or to submit a device to a sealer for verification prior to installation. Under existing law, a device may only be placed in service by a sealer or a service agency. This bill would limit the term "placed in service" to mean to permit the use of a device that has been tested and found to be correct, as specified, and type approved, as provided. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 539, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6186.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6181.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4561.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 4973.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 7).

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  26. Read first time.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  28. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Daly · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Daly

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70002
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Gray — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gomez — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Levine — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Democratic 2001
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Liu — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Torres — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71001
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Logue — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fong — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Weber — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2451 do?
(1) Existing law requires the sealer of a county to inspect and test weighing and measuring devices, as specified, that are used or sold for commercial purposes in the county. Existing law, until January 1, 2016, authorizes the county board of supervisors to charge fees to recover the costs of the county sealer to perform these duties. For marinas, mobilehome parks, recreational vehicle parks, and apartment complexes, where the owner is responsible for the utility meters, existing law prohibits the device fee for water submeters from exceeding $2 per device per space or apartment. This bill would require a county sealer who possesses the appropriate equipment for performing tests on water submeters to inspect, test, and certify to the accuracy of a water submeter, upon request of the owner, user, or operator of the water submeter, if any of specified conditions exist. By placing additional duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would permit the board of supervisors of the county to authorize the sealer to establish a schedule of fees to cover the costs of performing those services. This bill would authorize, upon written request of the owner, user, or operator, a water submeter that has been inspected, tested, and sealed by a sealer in one county to be installed in another county if certain conditions are met, including that the sealer of the county in which the water submeter is to be installed does not have reason to believe that the water submeter has been tampered with, damaged, or otherwise rendered inoperable since its inspection, testing, and sealing. (2) Existing law requires a sealer to seize and condemn, and authorizes the sealer to destroy, incorrect weights and measures and weighing and measuring instruments used for commercial purposes that are not susceptible of repair. Existing law requires a sealer to mark incorrect devices, that are susceptible of repair, with a tag or other device with the words "Out of order." For these purposes, existing law defines "incorrect" as any instrument that fails to meet prescribed tolerances and specifications and other technical requirements for commercial weighing and measuring. This bill would require a water submeter, that has been tested and found to be incorrect before its initial installation, to be marked with the words "Out of order" and to be returned to a service agent only if certain conditions are met. Because the bill would impose additional duties on county sealers and because a violation of this provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would further specify that an owner, user, or operator of a water submeter that has previously been sealed, installed, and used commercially who submits the water submeter to a sealer for inspection and testing shall not be subject to criminal prosecution or liable for fines or other penalties for a violation of specified provisions regulating weights and measures if the device is found to be incorrect, if prescribed conditions apply. (3) Existing law regulates the utilization and repair of weighing or measuring devices. Under existing law, for purposes of weighing and measuring devices, the term "placed in service" means to permit the use of a device that has been tested and found to be correct, as specified, and type approved, as provided, or to submit a device to a sealer for verification prior to installation. Under existing law, a device may only be placed in service by a sealer or a service agency. This bill would limit the term "placed in service" to mean to permit the use of a device that has been tested and found to be correct, as specified, and type approved, as provided. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 2451?
AB 2451 is sponsored by Daly.
What is the current status of AB 2451?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2451?
Track AB 2451 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2451

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2451

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →