California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 169 — State highways: scenic highways.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the California Transportation Commission to adopt a location for a state highway alignment on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides that certain portions of authorized state highway routes are also within the state scenic highway system, subject to implementation through a corridor protection system designed to meet certain scenic highway standards. Existing law provides for the Department of Transportation to designate a particular state highway within the scenic highway system as an official state scenic highway upon determination by the department that a corridor protection program has been implemented, as specified. Existing law includes in the state scenic highway system the portion of State Highway Route 10 between Route 38 near Redlands and Route 62 near Whitewater in the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. This bill would delete this portion of State Highway Route 10 from the state scenic highway system.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 1854.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 3. Page 2510.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee.

  10. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 1).

  12. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 576.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  18. Set for hearing April 15.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 391.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Set for hearing April 2.

  21. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  22. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 7.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Emmerson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Emmerson

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB169 Emmerson Concurrence

Passed 37 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34101
Democratic 3000
Total 37101
% of votes cast 95%3%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Block — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Nay
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 169 Emmerson Senate Third Reading By NESTANDE

Passed 72 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 61303
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 72303
% of votes cast 92%4%0%4%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Gonzalez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Campos — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Stone — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Eggman — Not Voting
Skinner — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Not Voting
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Daly — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33002
Democratic 2001
Total 35003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Hueso — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

environment transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 169 do?
Existing law authorizes the California Transportation Commission to adopt a location for a state highway alignment on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides that certain portions of authorized state highway routes are also within the state scenic highway system, subject to implementation through a corridor protection system designed to meet certain scenic highway standards. Existing law provides for the Department of Transportation to designate a particular state highway within the scenic highway system as an official state scenic highway upon determination by the department that a corridor protection program has been implemented, as specified. Existing law includes in the state scenic highway system the portion of State Highway Route 10 between Route 38 near Redlands and Route 62 near Whitewater in the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside. This bill would delete this portion of State Highway Route 10 from the state scenic highway system.
Who sponsors SB 169?
SB 169 is sponsored by Emmerson.
What is the current status of SB 169?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 169?
Track SB 169 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 169

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 169

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →