AB 686 — Alcoholic beverages: sales: distilled spirits.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act contains various provisions regulating the application for, the issuance of, the suspension of, and the conditions imposed upon, alcoholic beverage licenses by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The act permits the holder of a manufacturer's license to sell alcoholic beverages to specified licensed parties only and not to the general public. The act provides that a violation of its provisions is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would authorize distilled spirits manufacturers to sell general merchandise, food, nonalcoholic beverages, and distilled spirits to consumers for consumption on the licensed premises where sold. Because the violation of a provision of a license is punishable as a misdemeanor and the bill would broaden the range of activities a distilled spirits manufacturer's license authorizes, the bill would expand the definition of an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 28, 2014
- Amended 05/24/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 24, 2013
- Amended 05/07/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 07, 2013
- Amended 03/19/13 - Amended Assembly pdf March 19, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- AB686 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1753.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 24).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Quirk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Quirk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 686 do?
- The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act contains various provisions regulating the application for, the issuance of, the suspension of, and the conditions imposed upon, alcoholic beverage licenses by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The act permits the holder of a manufacturer's license to sell alcoholic beverages to specified licensed parties only and not to the general public. The act provides that a violation of its provisions is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would authorize distilled spirits manufacturers to sell general merchandise, food, nonalcoholic beverages, and distilled spirits to consumers for consumption on the licensed premises where sold. Because the violation of a provision of a license is punishable as a misdemeanor and the bill would broaden the range of activities a distilled spirits manufacturer's license authorizes, the bill would expand the definition of an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 686?
- AB 686 is sponsored by Quirk.
- What is the current status of AB 686?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 686?
- Track AB 686 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 686
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 686
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →