AB 1594 — Waste management.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 719, Statutes of 2014.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, establishes an integrated waste management program. The act requires the department to file an annual report, on or before March 1 of each year, with the Legislature, regarding the administration of the act during the prior calendar year. This bill would require the department to include in the annual report, on or before March 1, 2015, a status update on the adequacy of funding from the Integrated Waste Management Fund for programs implemented pursuant to the act and pursuant to other specified provisions regulating waste management facilities. The bill would authorize the department to recommend alternative funding mechanisms for the programs, as specified. Existing law requires each city, county, and joint powers authority formed under the act, referred to as a regional agency, to develop a source reduction and recycling element of an integrated waste management plan. The act requires the source reduction and recycling element to divert from disposal 50% of all solid waste subject to the element through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities, with specified exceptions. Under the act, the use of solid waste for beneficial reuse in the construction and operation of a solid waste landfill, including the use of alternative daily cover, constitutes diversion through recycling and is not considered disposal. This bill, commencing January 1, 2020, would provide that the use of green material, as defined, as alternative daily cover does not constitute diversion through recycling and would be considered disposal for purposes of the act. The bill, commencing August 1, 2018, would require a local jurisdiction to include information in an annual report on how the local jurisdiction intends to address these diversion requirements and divert green material that is being used as alternative daily cover. The bill would require a jurisdiction that does not meet certain diversion requirements as a result of not being able to claim diversion for the use of green material as alternative daily cover to identify and address, in an annual report, barriers to recycling green material and, if sufficient capacity at facilities that recycle green material is not expected to be operational before a certain date, to include a plan to address those barriers. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the diversion of solid waste. Existing law requires the operator of a disposal facility to pay a quarterly fee based on the amount of solid waste disposed of at each disposal site. This bill would provide that, commencing January 1, 2020, green material used as alternative daily cover at a solid waste landfill is not subject to this fee. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2014
- Enrolled 09/04/14 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2014
- Amended 08/22/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 08/04/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 04, 2014
- Amended 07/01/14 - Amended Senate pdf July 01, 2014
- Amended 06/12/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 12, 2014
- Amended 05/27/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 27, 2014
- Amended 05/07/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 07, 2014
- Amended 04/21/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2014
- Introduced 02/03/14 - Introduced pdf February 03, 2014
- AB1594 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 719, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 21. Page 6655.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 6646.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 4893.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 25).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 21. Page 5360.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5065.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Williams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Williams
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 30% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 27% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1594 do?
- The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, establishes an integrated waste management program. The act requires the department to file an annual report, on or before March 1 of each year, with the Legislature, regarding the administration of the act during the prior calendar year. This bill would require the department to include in the annual report, on or before March 1, 2015, a status update on the adequacy of funding from the Integrated Waste Management Fund for programs implemented pursuant to the act and pursuant to other specified provisions regulating waste management facilities. The bill would authorize the department to recommend alternative funding mechanisms for the programs, as specified. Existing law requires each city, county, and joint powers authority formed under the act, referred to as a regional agency, to develop a source reduction and recycling element of an integrated waste management plan. The act requires the source reduction and recycling element to divert from disposal 50% of all solid waste subject to the element through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities, with specified exceptions. Under the act, the use of solid waste for beneficial reuse in the construction and operation of a solid waste landfill, including the use of alternative daily cover, constitutes diversion through recycling and is not considered disposal. This bill, commencing January 1, 2020, would provide that the use of green material, as defined, as alternative daily cover does not constitute diversion through recycling and would be considered disposal for purposes of the act. The bill, commencing August 1, 2018, would require a local jurisdiction to include information in an annual report on how the local jurisdiction intends to address these diversion requirements and divert green material that is being used as alternative daily cover. The bill would require a jurisdiction that does not meet certain diversion requirements as a result of not being able to claim diversion for the use of green material as alternative daily cover to identify and address, in an annual report, barriers to recycling green material and, if sufficient capacity at facilities that recycle green material is not expected to be operational before a certain date, to include a plan to address those barriers. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the diversion of solid waste. Existing law requires the operator of a disposal facility to pay a quarterly fee based on the amount of solid waste disposed of at each disposal site. This bill would provide that, commencing January 1, 2020, green material used as alternative daily cover at a solid waste landfill is not subject to this fee. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1594?
- AB 1594 is sponsored by Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 1594?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1594?
- Track AB 1594 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1594
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1594
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →