California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 692 — Local government: community facilities districts.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 219, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative bodies of 2 or more local agencies, at any time prior to the adoption of the resolution of formation creating a community facilities district or a resolution of change to alter a district, or a resolution or resolutions authorizing issuance of bonds, to enter into a joint community facilities agreement or into a joint exercise of powers agreement, pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, to exercise any power authorized by the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 with respect to the community facilities district being created or changed if the legislative body of each entity adopts a resolution declaring that the joint agreement would be beneficial to the residents of that entity. This bill would specify that this authorization is not intended to limit the ability of a joint powers authority created pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act to exercise powers authorized by the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985. (2) Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, after a community facilities district has been created and authorized to levy specified special taxes, the legislative body may, by ordinance, levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion them in the manner specified in the resolution forming the community facilities district. The act also authorizes the annexation of territory to the community facilities district by unanimous approval of the owner or owners following the formation of that district. This bill would authorize the legislative body, in the case of a community facilities district that includes property proposed to be annexed to the district at a future date by unanimous approval, to, by ordinance, provide for the imposition of special taxes on that property, as specified. (3) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative body to, by resolution, designate a portion or portions of the district as one or more improvement areas for purposes of the financing of, or contributing to the financing of, specified public facilities, as specified, and following the designation, authorizes all proceedings for purposes of a bond election and for the purpose of levying special taxes for payment of the bonds, or for any other change, to apply only to the improvement area for those specified facilities. This bill would authorize the legislative body to designate a parcel or parcels of property included in a community facilities district by unanimous approval, as specified, as an improvement area without additional hearings or procedures, as specified. The bill would specify that following the designation, all proceedings for approval of the appropriations limit, the rate and method of apportionment and manner of collection of special taxes, and the authorization to incur bonded indebtedness for the parcel or parcels applies only within the improvement area. (4) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative body to incur bonded indebtedness, as specified, and authorizes any refunding bonds issued to be exchanged for the bonds to be refunded on such basis as the legislative body determines is for the benefit of the district. The legislative body is also authorized to sell the refunding bonds at public or private sale, and to place the proceeds of any sale of refunding bonds for cash in the "refunding fund" in the treasury of the local agency. The funds in the "revolving account" are required to be secured and may be invested in accordance with any other laws applicable to the funds of the local agency. Existing law requires the proceeds and investments in the "refunding fund" at the time of issuance of the refunding bonds, as certified by a certified public accountant, to be in an amount sufficient to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunded bonds as they become due or at designated dates prior to maturity and the designated costs of issuance of the refunding bonds, or to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunding bonds prior to the maturity of the bonds to be refunded or prior to a designated date or dates before the maturity of the bonds to be refunded, the principal and any redemption premiums due on the refunded bonds at maturity or upon that designated date or dates, and the designated costs of issuance of the refunding bonds. This bill would, with regard to the proceeds and any other cash in the "refunding fund," require those funds to be held uninvested or invested in noncallable obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof, when those obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America, and requires those proceeds to be in an amount sufficient to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunded bonds as they become due or at designated dates prior to maturity, in which case certification of a certified public accountant is not required. The bill would authorize a local agency to execute and record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which a community facilities district is located, a notice of the owner's agreement to disclose certain information and a notice of termination of that obligation, as specified. The bill would subject a subsequent transferee of the property to the disclosure obligation. (5) The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes the legislative or other governing bodies of 2 or more public agencies to jointly exercise by agreement any power common to the contracting parties, as specified, and authorizes that joint powers authority to exercise various powers, including, among others, the power to take title to, and sell by installment sale or otherwise, lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in lands that are located within the state that the authority determines are necessary or convenient for the financing of public capital improvements, or any portion thereof. This bill would additionally authorize the joint powers authority to lease lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in lands that are located within the state that the authority determines are necessary or convenient for the financing of public capital improvements, or any portion thereof. (6) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes a community facilities district to finance various services, including, but not limited to, police protection services and maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space. This bill would also authorize the financing of the maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property, with an estimated useful life of 5 years or more, that is owned by the local agency or by another local agency, as specified. (7) Existing law specifies the requirements for the establishment of a community facilities district, including, among other things, a petition, a hearing, the establishment of the boundaries of the community facilities district, and an election on the question of establishment. Existing law authorizes a separate procedure for establishing a community facilities district where, with the unanimous approval of parcel owners, the district initially consists solely of territory proposed for annexation to the community facilities district in the future, as specified, and, for a district so established, provides for an alternate procedure for establishing a district appropriations limit, applying special taxes, and incurring bonded indebtedness. This bill would also exclude a legislative body from being obligated to specify in the resolution of intention the conditions under which the obligation to pay the specified special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied, and would instead authorize a prepayment provision to be included in the unanimous approval, as specified. The bill would authorize, as an alternate and independent procedure for making changes to authorized facilities and services, the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of the parcel or parcels that will be affected by the change together with the written consent of the local agency, as specified.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 219, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1949.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 3. Page 2593.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Page 2508.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 12).

  11. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 713.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  15. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 566.) (April 17).

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  18. Set for hearing April 17.

  19. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  20. Read first time.

  21. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.

  22. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hancock · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hancock

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 2001
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beall — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 72 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 65303
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 72303
% of votes cast 92%4%0%4%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Chau — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Levine — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Salas — Yea
Medina — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Gordon — Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent #2

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34001
Democratic 3000
Total 37001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Wright — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Knight — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 692 do?
(1) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative bodies of 2 or more local agencies, at any time prior to the adoption of the resolution of formation creating a community facilities district or a resolution of change to alter a district, or a resolution or resolutions authorizing issuance of bonds, to enter into a joint community facilities agreement or into a joint exercise of powers agreement, pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, to exercise any power authorized by the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 with respect to the community facilities district being created or changed if the legislative body of each entity adopts a resolution declaring that the joint agreement would be beneficial to the residents of that entity. This bill would specify that this authorization is not intended to limit the ability of a joint powers authority created pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act to exercise powers authorized by the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985. (2) Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, after a community facilities district has been created and authorized to levy specified special taxes, the legislative body may, by ordinance, levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion them in the manner specified in the resolution forming the community facilities district. The act also authorizes the annexation of territory to the community facilities district by unanimous approval of the owner or owners following the formation of that district. This bill would authorize the legislative body, in the case of a community facilities district that includes property proposed to be annexed to the district at a future date by unanimous approval, to, by ordinance, provide for the imposition of special taxes on that property, as specified. (3) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative body to, by resolution, designate a portion or portions of the district as one or more improvement areas for purposes of the financing of, or contributing to the financing of, specified public facilities, as specified, and following the designation, authorizes all proceedings for purposes of a bond election and for the purpose of levying special taxes for payment of the bonds, or for any other change, to apply only to the improvement area for those specified facilities. This bill would authorize the legislative body to designate a parcel or parcels of property included in a community facilities district by unanimous approval, as specified, as an improvement area without additional hearings or procedures, as specified. The bill would specify that following the designation, all proceedings for approval of the appropriations limit, the rate and method of apportionment and manner of collection of special taxes, and the authorization to incur bonded indebtedness for the parcel or parcels applies only within the improvement area. (4) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes the legislative body to incur bonded indebtedness, as specified, and authorizes any refunding bonds issued to be exchanged for the bonds to be refunded on such basis as the legislative body determines is for the benefit of the district. The legislative body is also authorized to sell the refunding bonds at public or private sale, and to place the proceeds of any sale of refunding bonds for cash in the "refunding fund" in the treasury of the local agency. The funds in the "revolving account" are required to be secured and may be invested in accordance with any other laws applicable to the funds of the local agency. Existing law requires the proceeds and investments in the "refunding fund" at the time of issuance of the refunding bonds, as certified by a certified public accountant, to be in an amount sufficient to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunded bonds as they become due or at designated dates prior to maturity and the designated costs of issuance of the refunding bonds, or to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunding bonds prior to the maturity of the bonds to be refunded or prior to a designated date or dates before the maturity of the bonds to be refunded, the principal and any redemption premiums due on the refunded bonds at maturity or upon that designated date or dates, and the designated costs of issuance of the refunding bonds. This bill would, with regard to the proceeds and any other cash in the "refunding fund," require those funds to be held uninvested or invested in noncallable obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof, when those obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America, and requires those proceeds to be in an amount sufficient to pay the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on the refunded bonds as they become due or at designated dates prior to maturity, in which case certification of a certified public accountant is not required. The bill would authorize a local agency to execute and record in the office of the county recorder of the county in which a community facilities district is located, a notice of the owner's agreement to disclose certain information and a notice of termination of that obligation, as specified. The bill would subject a subsequent transferee of the property to the disclosure obligation. (5) The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes the legislative or other governing bodies of 2 or more public agencies to jointly exercise by agreement any power common to the contracting parties, as specified, and authorizes that joint powers authority to exercise various powers, including, among others, the power to take title to, and sell by installment sale or otherwise, lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in lands that are located within the state that the authority determines are necessary or convenient for the financing of public capital improvements, or any portion thereof. This bill would additionally authorize the joint powers authority to lease lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in lands that are located within the state that the authority determines are necessary or convenient for the financing of public capital improvements, or any portion thereof. (6) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 authorizes a community facilities district to finance various services, including, but not limited to, police protection services and maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space. This bill would also authorize the financing of the maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property, with an estimated useful life of 5 years or more, that is owned by the local agency or by another local agency, as specified. (7) Existing law specifies the requirements for the establishment of a community facilities district, including, among other things, a petition, a hearing, the establishment of the boundaries of the community facilities district, and an election on the question of establishment. Existing law authorizes a separate procedure for establishing a community facilities district where, with the unanimous approval of parcel owners, the district initially consists solely of territory proposed for annexation to the community facilities district in the future, as specified, and, for a district so established, provides for an alternate procedure for establishing a district appropriations limit, applying special taxes, and incurring bonded indebtedness. This bill would also exclude a legislative body from being obligated to specify in the resolution of intention the conditions under which the obligation to pay the specified special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied, and would instead authorize a prepayment provision to be included in the unanimous approval, as specified. The bill would authorize, as an alternate and independent procedure for making changes to authorized facilities and services, the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of the parcel or parcels that will be affected by the change together with the written consent of the local agency, as specified.
Who sponsors SB 692?
SB 692 is sponsored by Hancock.
What is the current status of SB 692?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 692?
Track SB 692 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 692

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 692

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →