California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 812 — Child care: contracts: termination and suspension.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 249, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to apply sanctions against contracting agencies that have serious licensing violations, as defined and reported by the State Department of Social Services and provide 90 days' written notification to any contractor whose agreement is being terminated, unless there is imminent danger to the health and welfare of children if agency operation is not terminated promptly. This bill would require a 90-day written notification as specified, except in the case of certain immediate terminations. (2) Existing law requires the department to provide an independent appeal procedure in certain instances, including, but not limited to, contract termination or suspension, to each contracting agency providing specified child care and development services. This bill would delete the requirement that the department provide the independent appeal procedure for contract suspension. The bill would additionally require the department to provide an internal appeal procedure to resolve a dispute between the department and a contracting agency providing specified child care and development services regarding the interpretation or application of a contract term or condition, or to dispute the findings of a fiscal or programmatic review. (3) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a contract classification system with 3 classes of contract designations; a clear contract, a provisional contract, and a conditional contract, as specified. Existing law requires the Child Development Division of the department to provide technical assistance to agencies with conditional contracts. This bill would revise the 3 classes of contract designations, as specified. The bill would require that technical assistance also be provided to any contracting agency making a written request to its assigned consultant or administrator within 60 days of receipt of the request. (4) Existing law authorizes any contracting agency that evidences chronic fiscal or program violations of a felony nature, as specified, to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated provided there is documented evidence of the violations and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that evidences any specified acts or omissions to have its contract or contracts immediately terminated provided there is documented evidence of the acts or omission and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would add additional acts or omissions, as described, that may result in immediate termination of a contracting agency's contract or contracts and require the notice of immediate termination of a contract to be served in a specified manner. (5) Existing law authorizes a contracting agency that places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of certain crimes to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. Existing law authorizes a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and require the contract termination to occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that has in place or places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of a crime involving misuse or misappropriation of state or federal funds, or a state or federal crime involving moral turpitude, to have its contract immediately terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would repeal the authority of a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and the requirement that this termination occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. (6) Existing law authorizes local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the specified action is based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children. Existing law requires, if the contract is being terminated based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children, the reason for the termination to be specified by the department in its notice of termination. This bill would instead authorize local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the action is an immediate termination action, as specified, in which case a local contracting agency would not be authorized to continue to operate under the contract after the effective date given in the notice of immediate termination. (7) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 249, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2585.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1844.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  8. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

  11. Referred to Com. on ED.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1761.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  15. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).

  16. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  18. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Read second time and amended.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 30).

  21. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Mitchell · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Mitchell

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69002
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 76002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Weber — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Holden — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Linder — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Williams — Yea
Salas — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Chau — Yea
Conway — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Consent Calendar 2nd

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 3000
Total 38001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
Yee — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 66002
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Linder — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Stone — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 812 do?
(1) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to apply sanctions against contracting agencies that have serious licensing violations, as defined and reported by the State Department of Social Services and provide 90 days' written notification to any contractor whose agreement is being terminated, unless there is imminent danger to the health and welfare of children if agency operation is not terminated promptly. This bill would require a 90-day written notification as specified, except in the case of certain immediate terminations. (2) Existing law requires the department to provide an independent appeal procedure in certain instances, including, but not limited to, contract termination or suspension, to each contracting agency providing specified child care and development services. This bill would delete the requirement that the department provide the independent appeal procedure for contract suspension. The bill would additionally require the department to provide an internal appeal procedure to resolve a dispute between the department and a contracting agency providing specified child care and development services regarding the interpretation or application of a contract term or condition, or to dispute the findings of a fiscal or programmatic review. (3) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a contract classification system with 3 classes of contract designations; a clear contract, a provisional contract, and a conditional contract, as specified. Existing law requires the Child Development Division of the department to provide technical assistance to agencies with conditional contracts. This bill would revise the 3 classes of contract designations, as specified. The bill would require that technical assistance also be provided to any contracting agency making a written request to its assigned consultant or administrator within 60 days of receipt of the request. (4) Existing law authorizes any contracting agency that evidences chronic fiscal or program violations of a felony nature, as specified, to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated provided there is documented evidence of the violations and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that evidences any specified acts or omissions to have its contract or contracts immediately terminated provided there is documented evidence of the acts or omission and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would add additional acts or omissions, as described, that may result in immediate termination of a contracting agency's contract or contracts and require the notice of immediate termination of a contract to be served in a specified manner. (5) Existing law authorizes a contracting agency that places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of certain crimes to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. Existing law authorizes a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and require the contract termination to occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that has in place or places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of a crime involving misuse or misappropriation of state or federal funds, or a state or federal crime involving moral turpitude, to have its contract immediately terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would repeal the authority of a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and the requirement that this termination occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. (6) Existing law authorizes local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the specified action is based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children. Existing law requires, if the contract is being terminated based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children, the reason for the termination to be specified by the department in its notice of termination. This bill would instead authorize local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the action is an immediate termination action, as specified, in which case a local contracting agency would not be authorized to continue to operate under the contract after the effective date given in the notice of immediate termination. (7) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Who sponsors AB 812?
AB 812 is sponsored by Mitchell.
What is the current status of AB 812?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 812?
Track AB 812 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 812

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 812

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →