Child care: contracts: termination and suspension.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 812 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 812.
You're tracking AB 812
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 812 — Child care: contracts: termination and suspension.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 249, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to apply sanctions against contracting agencies that have serious licensing violations, as defined and reported by the State Department of Social Services and provide 90 days' written notification to any contractor whose agreement is being terminated, unless there is imminent danger to the health and welfare of children if agency operation is not terminated promptly. This bill would require a 90-day written notification as specified, except in the case of certain immediate terminations. (2) Existing law requires the department to provide an independent appeal procedure in certain instances, including, but not limited to, contract termination or suspension, to each contracting agency providing specified child care and development services. This bill would delete the requirement that the department provide the independent appeal procedure for contract suspension. The bill would additionally require the department to provide an internal appeal procedure to resolve a dispute between the department and a contracting agency providing specified child care and development services regarding the interpretation or application of a contract term or condition, or to dispute the findings of a fiscal or programmatic review. (3) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a contract classification system with 3 classes of contract designations; a clear contract, a provisional contract, and a conditional contract, as specified. Existing law requires the Child Development Division of the department to provide technical assistance to agencies with conditional contracts. This bill would revise the 3 classes of contract designations, as specified. The bill would require that technical assistance also be provided to any contracting agency making a written request to its assigned consultant or administrator within 60 days of receipt of the request. (4) Existing law authorizes any contracting agency that evidences chronic fiscal or program violations of a felony nature, as specified, to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated provided there is documented evidence of the violations and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that evidences any specified acts or omissions to have its contract or contracts immediately terminated provided there is documented evidence of the acts or omission and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would add additional acts or omissions, as described, that may result in immediate termination of a contracting agency's contract or contracts and require the notice of immediate termination of a contract to be served in a specified manner. (5) Existing law authorizes a contracting agency that places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of certain crimes to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. Existing law authorizes a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and require the contract termination to occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that has in place or places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of a crime involving misuse or misappropriation of state or federal funds, or a state or federal crime involving moral turpitude, to have its contract immediately terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would repeal the authority of a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and the requirement that this termination occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. (6) Existing law authorizes local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the specified action is based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children. Existing law requires, if the contract is being terminated based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children, the reason for the termination to be specified by the department in its notice of termination. This bill would instead authorize local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the action is an immediate termination action, as specified, in which case a local contracting agency would not be authorized to continue to operate under the contract after the effective date given in the notice of immediate termination. (7) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/06/13 - Chaptered Current pdf September 06, 2013
- Enrolled 08/23/13 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2013
- Amended 06/26/13 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2013
- Amended 05/15/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 15, 2013
- Amended 05/07/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 07, 2013
- Amended 04/22/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- AB812 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 249, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2585.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1844.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1761.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mitchell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mitchell
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 812 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to apply sanctions against contracting agencies that have serious licensing violations, as defined and reported by the State Department of Social Services and provide 90 days' written notification to any contractor whose agreement is being terminated, unless there is imminent danger to the health and welfare of children if agency operation is not terminated promptly. This bill would require a 90-day written notification as specified, except in the case of certain immediate terminations. (2) Existing law requires the department to provide an independent appeal procedure in certain instances, including, but not limited to, contract termination or suspension, to each contracting agency providing specified child care and development services. This bill would delete the requirement that the department provide the independent appeal procedure for contract suspension. The bill would additionally require the department to provide an internal appeal procedure to resolve a dispute between the department and a contracting agency providing specified child care and development services regarding the interpretation or application of a contract term or condition, or to dispute the findings of a fiscal or programmatic review. (3) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a contract classification system with 3 classes of contract designations; a clear contract, a provisional contract, and a conditional contract, as specified. Existing law requires the Child Development Division of the department to provide technical assistance to agencies with conditional contracts. This bill would revise the 3 classes of contract designations, as specified. The bill would require that technical assistance also be provided to any contracting agency making a written request to its assigned consultant or administrator within 60 days of receipt of the request. (4) Existing law authorizes any contracting agency that evidences chronic fiscal or program violations of a felony nature, as specified, to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated provided there is documented evidence of the violations and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that evidences any specified acts or omissions to have its contract or contracts immediately terminated provided there is documented evidence of the acts or omission and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would add additional acts or omissions, as described, that may result in immediate termination of a contracting agency's contract or contracts and require the notice of immediate termination of a contract to be served in a specified manner. (5) Existing law authorizes a contracting agency that places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of certain crimes to have its contract immediately suspended or terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. Existing law authorizes a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and require the contract termination to occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency that has in place or places a person in a position of fiscal responsibility or control who has been convicted of a crime involving misuse or misappropriation of state or federal funds, or a state or federal crime involving moral turpitude, to have its contract immediately terminated if there is documented evidence of the conviction and upon review and recommendation of the general counsel of the department. The bill would repeal the authority of a contracting agency whose contract is terminated for the reasons described above to appeal the contract termination, and the requirement that this termination occur after notice, as specified, is provided at least 90 days before termination. (6) Existing law authorizes local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the specified action is based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children. Existing law requires, if the contract is being terminated based on imminent danger to the health and welfare of children, the reason for the termination to be specified by the department in its notice of termination. This bill would instead authorize local contracting agencies to continue to operate under their contract during an appeal of termination, unless the action is an immediate termination action, as specified, in which case a local contracting agency would not be authorized to continue to operate under the contract after the effective date given in the notice of immediate termination. (7) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 812?
- AB 812 is sponsored by Mitchell.
- What is the current status of AB 812?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 812?
- Track AB 812 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 812
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 812
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →