AB 1685 — Structural pest control operators: fees.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2014.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of registered structural pest control companies by the Structural Pest Control Board. Existing law requires a registered structural pest control company to provide a specified written notice to the owner, or owner's agent, and the tenant of the premises where pest control work is to be done. Existing law authorizes the notice to be given by first-class mail, posting in a conspicuous place on the real property, or personal mail. This bill would permit notice to be given by electronic mail, in addition to the currently authorized methods, if an electronic mail address has been provided. Existing law authorizes an individual who is 18 years of age or older to apply for a license as an applicator. Existing law requires the board to ascertain the knowledge of the applicant to apply certain classes of chemicals by means of a written examination and authorizes the board to charge a fee for the examination in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable cost of administering the exam, not to exceed $15. This bill would instead authorize the board to charge a fee in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable regulatory cost of administering the examination, not to exceed $60. Existing law requires, as a condition of renewal of each operator's and field representative's license, that the holder submit proof of continuing education, as specified. Existing law authorizes the person, in lieu of that requirement, to take and successfully complete an examination given by the board to test his or her knowledge of development in the field of pest control since the issuance of his or her license. Existing law authorizes the board to charge a fee for the taking of an examination in each branch of pest control in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of administering the examination, but in no event to exceed $50 for each examination. This bill would authorize the board to charge a fee for administering an examination in each branch of pest control in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable regulatory cost of administering the examination and would remove the $50 fee limit. Existing law provides a comprehensive scheme for the licensure and regulation of structural pest control operators which, among other things, sets forth a fee schedule for licensure and registration of those companies and their personnel who are engaged in structural pest control work. This bill would increase specified fees paid by structural pest control operators.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/09/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 09, 2014
- Enrolled 08/13/14 - Enrolled pdf August 13, 2014
- Amended 04/21/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2014
- Amended 04/02/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 02, 2014
- Amended 03/11/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 11, 2014
- Introduced 02/13/14 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2014
- AB1685 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 304, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4417.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 30).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 4835.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Williams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Williams
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1685 do?
- Existing law provides for the regulation of registered structural pest control companies by the Structural Pest Control Board. Existing law requires a registered structural pest control company to provide a specified written notice to the owner, or owner's agent, and the tenant of the premises where pest control work is to be done. Existing law authorizes the notice to be given by first-class mail, posting in a conspicuous place on the real property, or personal mail. This bill would permit notice to be given by electronic mail, in addition to the currently authorized methods, if an electronic mail address has been provided. Existing law authorizes an individual who is 18 years of age or older to apply for a license as an applicator. Existing law requires the board to ascertain the knowledge of the applicant to apply certain classes of chemicals by means of a written examination and authorizes the board to charge a fee for the examination in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable cost of administering the exam, not to exceed $15. This bill would instead authorize the board to charge a fee in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable regulatory cost of administering the examination, not to exceed $60. Existing law requires, as a condition of renewal of each operator's and field representative's license, that the holder submit proof of continuing education, as specified. Existing law authorizes the person, in lieu of that requirement, to take and successfully complete an examination given by the board to test his or her knowledge of development in the field of pest control since the issuance of his or her license. Existing law authorizes the board to charge a fee for the taking of an examination in each branch of pest control in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of administering the examination, but in no event to exceed $50 for each examination. This bill would authorize the board to charge a fee for administering an examination in each branch of pest control in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable regulatory cost of administering the examination and would remove the $50 fee limit. Existing law provides a comprehensive scheme for the licensure and regulation of structural pest control operators which, among other things, sets forth a fee schedule for licensure and registration of those companies and their personnel who are engaged in structural pest control work. This bill would increase specified fees paid by structural pest control operators.
- Who sponsors AB 1685?
- AB 1685 is sponsored by Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 1685?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1685?
- Track AB 1685 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1685
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1685
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →