Law enforcement: anti-reproductive-rights crimes.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 340 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 340.
You're tracking SB 340
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 340 — Law enforcement: anti-reproductive-rights crimes.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 285, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Reproductive Rights Law Enforcement Act, requires the Attorney General to assume specified duties relating to planning, information gathering, and analysis with respect to anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as defined, including consultation with specified subject matter experts. Existing law also requires the convening of an advisory committee that is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of existing law. Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to develop an optional course of training for law enforcement agencies regarding anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as specified. Existing law provides for the repeal of these provisions as of January 1, 2014. This bill would make existing law operative indefinitely. Because the bill would extend the operative date of provisions that would impose reporting requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/09/13 - Chaptered Current pdf September 09, 2013
- Enrolled 08/27/13 - Enrolled pdf August 27, 2013
- Introduced 02/20/13 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2013
- SB340 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 285, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 52. Noes 21. Page 2704.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (July 3).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 7. Page 905.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 816.) (May 6).
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 666.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Jackson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jackson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 18 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 21 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 27% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 18% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 340 do?
- Existing law, the Reproductive Rights Law Enforcement Act, requires the Attorney General to assume specified duties relating to planning, information gathering, and analysis with respect to anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as defined, including consultation with specified subject matter experts. Existing law also requires the convening of an advisory committee that is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of existing law. Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to develop an optional course of training for law enforcement agencies regarding anti-reproductive-rights crimes, as specified. Existing law provides for the repeal of these provisions as of January 1, 2014. This bill would make existing law operative indefinitely. Because the bill would extend the operative date of provisions that would impose reporting requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 340?
- SB 340 is sponsored by Jackson.
- What is the current status of SB 340?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 340?
- Track SB 340 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 340
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 340
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →