Health care coverage: provider contracts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2400 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2400.
You're tracking AB 2400
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2400 — Health care coverage: provider contracts.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance and authorizes health insurers to contract with providers for alternative rates of payment. Existing law, known as the Health Care Providers' Bill of Rights, prescribes restrictions on the types of contractual provisions that may be included in agreements between health care service plans or health insurers and health care providers. Under existing law, if a change is made by amending a manual, policy, or procedure document referenced in the contract between a health care service plan and a provider, the plan is required to provide at least 45 business days' notice to the provider and the provider has the right to negotiate and agree to the change and terminate the contract prior to the change, as specified, except that if the contract between the plan and the provider provides benefits through a preferred provider arrangement, the provider only has the right to terminate the contract prior to the change. Existing law authorizes the contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions permitting a material change to the contract by the insurer if the insurer provides at least 45 business days' notice to the provider. This bill would require a health care service plan to provide at least 90 business days' notice to a contracting provider if a change is made by amending a manual, policy, or procedure document referenced in the contract and would require that the provider under a preferred provider arrangement have the right to negotiate and agree to the change. The bill would authorize a contract between a provider and a health insurer for alternative rates of payment to contain provisions permitting a material change to the contract by the insurer if the insurer provides at least 90 business days' notice to the provider. The bill would also prohibit a contract between a plan or insurer and a provider that is issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2015, from including any provision that would require a provider to accept or participate in any additional products or product networks, without making specified disclosures, or that would terminate the health care provider's contract, or the provider's eligibility to participate in other product networks, when the provider exercises the right to negotiate, accept, or refuse a material change to the contract. By expanding the scope of a crime with respect to health care service plans, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/06/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 06, 2014
- Amended 04/22/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2400 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 8. Page 5298.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 1.) (April 29).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Ridley-Thomas · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ridley-Thomas
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 55 | 8 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 6% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2400 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance and authorizes health insurers to contract with providers for alternative rates of payment. Existing law, known as the Health Care Providers' Bill of Rights, prescribes restrictions on the types of contractual provisions that may be included in agreements between health care service plans or health insurers and health care providers. Under existing law, if a change is made by amending a manual, policy, or procedure document referenced in the contract between a health care service plan and a provider, the plan is required to provide at least 45 business days' notice to the provider and the provider has the right to negotiate and agree to the change and terminate the contract prior to the change, as specified, except that if the contract between the plan and the provider provides benefits through a preferred provider arrangement, the provider only has the right to terminate the contract prior to the change. Existing law authorizes the contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions permitting a material change to the contract by the insurer if the insurer provides at least 45 business days' notice to the provider. This bill would require a health care service plan to provide at least 90 business days' notice to a contracting provider if a change is made by amending a manual, policy, or procedure document referenced in the contract and would require that the provider under a preferred provider arrangement have the right to negotiate and agree to the change. The bill would authorize a contract between a provider and a health insurer for alternative rates of payment to contain provisions permitting a material change to the contract by the insurer if the insurer provides at least 90 business days' notice to the provider. The bill would also prohibit a contract between a plan or insurer and a provider that is issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2015, from including any provision that would require a provider to accept or participate in any additional products or product networks, without making specified disclosures, or that would terminate the health care provider's contract, or the provider's eligibility to participate in other product networks, when the provider exercises the right to negotiate, accept, or refuse a material change to the contract. By expanding the scope of a crime with respect to health care service plans, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2400?
- AB 2400 is sponsored by Ridley-Thomas.
- What is the current status of AB 2400?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2400?
- Track AB 2400 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2400
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2400
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →