SB 1099 — Dependent children: wards of the juvenile court: sibling visitation.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, a child may come within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court and become a dependent child of the court in certain cases, including when the child is abused, a parent or guardian fails to adequately supervise or protect the child, as specified, or a parent or guardian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law generally subjects any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court. Existing law requires the responsible local agency to make a diligent effort in all out-of-home placements of dependent children to place siblings together in the same placement, and to develop and maintain sibling relationships. This bill would extend that requirement to all out-of-home placements of wards in foster care. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law permits any person to petition the juvenile court to assert a sibling relationship with a dependent child or a child who is the subject of a petition for adjudication as a dependent child and make certain requests, including a request for visitation with the dependent child. This bill would also authorize a dependent child or a nonminor dependent to request visitation with a sibling who is in the physical custody of a common legal or biological parent. The bill would authorize a court to grant those requests for visitation, unless it is determined by the court that visitation is contrary to the safety and well-being of any of the siblings. This bill would authorize any person, including a ward, a transition dependent, or a nonminor dependent of the juvenile court, to petition the court to assert a relationship as a sibling and make certain requests, including a request for visitation, with a sibling who is, or is the subject of an adjudication as, a ward of the juvenile court, as specified. The bill would authorize a ward, transition dependent, or nonminor dependent to assert a relationship as a sibling and request visitation with a nondependent sibling who is in the physical custody of a common legal or biological parent. The bill would authorize a court to grant those requests for visitation, unless it is determined by the court that visitation is contrary to the safety and well-being of any of the siblings. (3) Existing law requires, in order to maintain ties between the parent or guardian and any siblings and a child placed in foster care, an order placing a child in foster care and ordering reunification services to provide for visitation between the parent or guardian and the child and for visitation between any siblings and the child. This bill would additionally require an order placing a child in foster care and ordering reunification services to provide for review of the reasons for any suspension of sibling visitation at each periodic review hearing and for a requirement that, in order for the suspension to continue, a court make a renewed finding that sibling interaction is contrary to the safety or well-being of either child. (4) Existing law requires that the status of a dependent child in foster care be reviewed periodically, but no less frequently than once every 6 months. Existing law requires a court to determine specified information at that hearing, including whether the child has any siblings under the court's jurisdiction, and, if any siblings exist and are not placed with the child, the frequency and nature of the visits between siblings. Existing law requires a social worker or child advocate appointed by the court, when preparing certain social studies or evaluations, to include specified information, including whether the child has any siblings under the court's jurisdiction, and, if any siblings exist and are not placed with the child, the frequency and nature of the visits between siblings. This bill would additionally require, if any siblings exist and are not placed with the child, the court to determine, and require a social worker or child advocate appointed by the court to include in those social studies or evaluations, whether any visits between the siblings are supervised or unsupervised, and if visits are supervised, a discussion of the reasons why the visits are supervised, and what needs to be accomplished in order for the visits to be unsupervised, a description of the location and length of any visits, and any plan to increase visitation between siblings. By requiring county social workers to include additional information in certain social studies or evaluations, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law requires, after a minor is adjudged to be a ward of the court, the court to hear evidence on the question of the proper disposition to be made of the minor. Existing law requires the probation officer to prepare a case plan if placement in foster care is recommended by the probation officer, or if the minor is already in foster care placement or pending placement. Existing law requires the probation officer to include, among other things, scheduled visits between the minor and his or her family and an explanation if no visits are made. This bill would additionally require the probation officer to include specified information relating to the child's siblings. By imposing additional duties on probation officers, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 358.1 and 366.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 977, that would become operative only if this bill and SB 977 are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16002 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 1460, that would become operative only if this bill and SB 1460 are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 977 and SB 1460, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

• Chaptered 09/29/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2014
• Enrolled 09/03/14 - Enrolled pdf September 03, 2014
• Amended 08/22/14 - Amended Assembly pdf August 22, 2014
• Amended 08/18/14 - Amended Assembly pdf August 18, 2014
• Amended 04/29/14 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2014
• Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
• SB1099 View text html

Action History

1. September 29, 2014

   Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 773, Statutes of 2014.

2. September 29, 2014

   Approved by the Governor.

3. September 08, 2014

   Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

4. August 29, 2014

   Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4973.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

5. August 27, 2014

   In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

6. August 27, 2014

   Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6543.) Ordered to the Senate.

7. August 22, 2014

   Ordered to third reading.

8. August 22, 2014

   Read third time and amended. (Page 6343.)

9. August 19, 2014

   Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

10. August 18, 2014

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

11. August 14, 2014

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 14).

12. July 02, 2014

    Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

13. June 24, 2014

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

14. June 02, 2014

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

15. May 28, 2014

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

16. May 27, 2014

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3600.) Ordered to the Assembly.

17. May 23, 2014

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

18. May 23, 2014

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3708.) (May 23).

19. May 16, 2014

    Set for hearing May 23.

20. May 12, 2014

    Placed on APPR. suspense file.

21. May 02, 2014

    Set for hearing May 12.

22. April 29, 2014

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

23. April 28, 2014

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3235.) (April 22).

24. April 10, 2014

    Set for hearing April 22.

25. February 27, 2014

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

26. February 20, 2014

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

27. February 19, 2014

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

• Anderson · Cosponsor
• Achadjian · Cosponsor
• Beall · Cosponsor
• Bonta · Cosponsor
• Cannella · Cosponsor
• Chesbro · Cosponsor
• Chávez · Cosponsor
• Correa · Cosponsor
• Frazier · Cosponsor
• Medina · Cosponsor
• Nestande · Cosponsor
• Quirk · Cosponsor
• Steinberg · Primary
• Weber · Cosponsor
• Yamada · Cosponsor
• Bonnie Lowenthal · Cosponsor

Votes

Subjects