California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 466 — California Institute for Criminal Justice Policy.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the California Law Revision Commission to study, and limits the commission to studying, topics approved by resolution of the Legislature. Existing law requires the commission to examine statutes to discover defects and recommend reforms. This bill would establish the California Institute for Criminal Justice Policy and would require the institute to consult with certain entities, as specified, in order to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of, and to develop a ranking of, the effectiveness of crime prevention programs, rehabilitation programs, and recidivism reduction programs located in California. The bill would also authorized the institute to conduct additional research at the request of the Legislature. This bill would request the University of California to house the institute. The bill would become operative after a determination by the Director of Finance that sufficient private funds have been deposited with the state to fully support the startup and operational activities of the institute for one year, would be inoperative until funding is made available in the annual Budget Act, and would be repealed as of January 1, 2018.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Held under submission.

  4. Set, second hearing.

  5. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  6. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  9. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and HIGHER ED.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 6. Page 2688.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  13. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 2644.) (January 23).

  15. Set for hearing January 23.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. Held in committee and under submission.

  18. Set for hearing May 23.

  19. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  20. Set for hearing May 6.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 666.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Set for hearing April 23.

  23. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  24. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • DeSaulnier · Primary
  • Wolk · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 6 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25605
Democratic 3000
Total 28605
% of votes cast 72%15%0%13%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Wright — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Correa — Yea
Huff — Nay
Knight — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4101
Democratic 1000
Total 5101
% of votes cast 71%14%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 466 do?
Existing law requires the California Law Revision Commission to study, and limits the commission to studying, topics approved by resolution of the Legislature. Existing law requires the commission to examine statutes to discover defects and recommend reforms. This bill would establish the California Institute for Criminal Justice Policy and would require the institute to consult with certain entities, as specified, in order to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of, and to develop a ranking of, the effectiveness of crime prevention programs, rehabilitation programs, and recidivism reduction programs located in California. The bill would also authorized the institute to conduct additional research at the request of the Legislature. This bill would request the University of California to house the institute. The bill would become operative after a determination by the Director of Finance that sufficient private funds have been deposited with the state to fully support the startup and operational activities of the institute for one year, would be inoperative until funding is made available in the annual Budget Act, and would be repealed as of January 1, 2018.
Who sponsors SB 466?
SB 466 is sponsored by DeSaulnier and Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 466?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 466?
Track SB 466 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 466

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 466

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →