AB 2010 — Alcoholic beverages: beer returns: product quality: beer manufacturers: duplicate licenses.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 808, Statutes of 2014.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally permits a wholesaler or manufacturer to accept the return of beer from a retailer only if the beer is returned in exchange for the identical quantity and brand of beer. Existing law permits a credit memorandum to be issued when a package is broken or damaged when the return and corrections are completed within 15 days, as specified. Existing law provides exceptions from this limitation, including permitting the return of beer by a retailer to a seller, and by a seller to a manufacturer or importer, if the beer is recalled or presents a health or safety issue, as provided. This bill would extend the exception provided for beer that is recalled or presents a health and safety issue, as described above, to beer that has product quality issues, subject to Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control approval. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Existing law requires a license or permit to manufacture beer, unless the beer is manufactured for personal or family use, under specified conditions. A licensed beer manufacturer may sell beer to consumers at a branch location. Existing law requires the department to issue a duplicate license to a beer manufacturer if the beer manufacturer applies for a duplicate license. Under existing law, for 30 days from the date of the issuance of a duplicate license, retail sales of beer are prohibited at a branch office for which the duplicate license was issued. The act provides that a violation of its provisions is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would, instead, allow the department to issue a duplicate license at its discretion where specified privileges are to be exercised at the branch office. The bill would prohibit the sale or tasting of alcoholic beverages to consumers at more than 6 branch office locations, and allow 2 of the branch office locations to be bona fide eating places owned and operated by and for the beer manufacturer, as provided. The bill would require the department to issue a beer manufacturer temporary permit upon request and payment of a $100 fee and would also authorize the department to issue a duplicate license when specified privileges are not going to be exercised at a branch office. The bill would eliminate the 30-day prohibition on retail sales of beer for a branch office with a duplicate license. Because the violation of a provision of a license is punishable as a misdemeanor, the bill expands the definition of an existing crime, thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2014
- Enrolled 09/04/14 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2014
- Amended 08/11/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 11, 2014
- Amended 06/12/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 12, 2014
- Introduced 02/20/14 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2014
- AB2010 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 808, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6676.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4501.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4600.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gray · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gray
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2010 do?
- Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally permits a wholesaler or manufacturer to accept the return of beer from a retailer only if the beer is returned in exchange for the identical quantity and brand of beer. Existing law permits a credit memorandum to be issued when a package is broken or damaged when the return and corrections are completed within 15 days, as specified. Existing law provides exceptions from this limitation, including permitting the return of beer by a retailer to a seller, and by a seller to a manufacturer or importer, if the beer is recalled or presents a health or safety issue, as provided. This bill would extend the exception provided for beer that is recalled or presents a health and safety issue, as described above, to beer that has product quality issues, subject to Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control approval. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Existing law requires a license or permit to manufacture beer, unless the beer is manufactured for personal or family use, under specified conditions. A licensed beer manufacturer may sell beer to consumers at a branch location. Existing law requires the department to issue a duplicate license to a beer manufacturer if the beer manufacturer applies for a duplicate license. Under existing law, for 30 days from the date of the issuance of a duplicate license, retail sales of beer are prohibited at a branch office for which the duplicate license was issued. The act provides that a violation of its provisions is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would, instead, allow the department to issue a duplicate license at its discretion where specified privileges are to be exercised at the branch office. The bill would prohibit the sale or tasting of alcoholic beverages to consumers at more than 6 branch office locations, and allow 2 of the branch office locations to be bona fide eating places owned and operated by and for the beer manufacturer, as provided. The bill would require the department to issue a beer manufacturer temporary permit upon request and payment of a $100 fee and would also authorize the department to issue a duplicate license when specified privileges are not going to be exercised at a branch office. The bill would eliminate the 30-day prohibition on retail sales of beer for a branch office with a duplicate license. Because the violation of a provision of a license is punishable as a misdemeanor, the bill expands the definition of an existing crime, thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2010?
- AB 2010 is sponsored by Gray.
- What is the current status of AB 2010?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2010?
- Track AB 2010 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2010
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2010
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →