Budget Act of 2012: augmentation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 89 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 89.
You're tracking SB 89
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 89 — Budget Act of 2012: augmentation.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 36, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Budget Act of 2012 appropriated specified amounts from the General Fund for the support of state government. This bill would appropriate $497,299,976 from the General Fund in augmentation of a specified appropriation in the Budget Act of 2012, regarding augmentations for contingencies and emergencies, and would require the Controller to allocate this additional amount according to a specified schedule. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/27/13 - Chaptered Current pdf June 27, 2013
- Enrolled 06/14/13 - Enrolled pdf June 14, 2013
- Amended 06/12/13 - Amended Assembly pdf June 12, 2013
- Introduced 01/10/13 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2013
- SB89 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 36, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1375.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 14. Page 1990.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 1983.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 896.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.
-
(Corrected May 9).
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 62 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 18% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 24% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 89 do?
- The Budget Act of 2012 appropriated specified amounts from the General Fund for the support of state government. This bill would appropriate $497,299,976 from the General Fund in augmentation of a specified appropriation in the Budget Act of 2012, regarding augmentations for contingencies and emergencies, and would require the Controller to allocate this additional amount according to a specified schedule. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 89?
- SB 89 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 89?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 89?
- Track SB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 89
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 89
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →