California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 529 — Vehicles: motor carriers: inspections and fees.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 500, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Biennial Inspection of Terminals Program (BIT) to ensure the safe operation of certain vehicles by a motor carrier through the inspection of these vehicles at the motor carrier's terminal by the Department of the California Highway Patrol. Existing law defines a motor carrier, for this purpose, as the registered owner of, and in some cases the lessee or person exclusively authorizing and directing the operation of, specified vehicles. Existing law requires, within 30 days of establishing a terminal, a motor carrier to schedule an inspection by submitting to the department an application for a terminal inspection accompanied by the payment of a fee the amount of which is based on the number of vehicles in a terminal or the "terminal fleet size." Existing law requires the department to inspect every terminal at least once every 25 months and defines a terminal as the location or locations designated by the motor carrier where subject vehicles and specific records are available for inspection. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, revise and recast these provisions as the Basic Inspection of Terminals (BIT) Program. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, authorize the department to conduct terminal inspections at any time. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2016, to implement a performance-based truck terminal inspection priority system similar to that used by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that would require the department to place an inspection priority on motor carrier terminals never previously inspected by the department. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2016, the department to create a database to include specified performance-based data and provide real-time information to the department regarding motor carrier performance, as specified. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, provide that the department is not required to inspect a terminal more than once every 6 years, if certain conditions apply, and provides that terminals that receive less than a satisfactory compliance rating would be subject to periodic inspections based on the severity of violations. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol, commencing January 30, 2017, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Department of Motor Vehicles the amount it expended for truck terminal inspections and roadside safety inspections. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to compare those expenditures to the amounts collected for carrier inspection fees, as specified, and, commencing July 1, 2017, and every 5 years thereafter, adjust the carrier inspection fee to ensure that the net revenues from the carrier inspection fee are sufficient to cover the Department of the California Highway Patrol's reasonable costs for those activities. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature in this regard. Existing law provides that it is a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate a vehicle without having submitted an inspection application and the required fees to the department, as specified. This bill would revise those provisions to, commencing January 1, 2016, make it a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate any of specified types of vehicles without identifying to the department all terminals in this state where vehicles may be inspected by the department and where vehicle inspection and maintenance records and driver records will be made available for inspection. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, require the lessor of certain vehicles to make vehicles available for inspection upon request of an authorized representative of the department in the course of inspecting the terminal of the lessee. The bill would make a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, make it a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate or cause to be operated any of specified vehicles unless the motor carrier is knowledgeable of, and in compliance with, all applicable statutes and regulations. By expanding the provisions of existing law, the violation of which is an offense, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, require a motor carrier to make vehicles and records available for inspection upon request by the department and to pay a carrier inspection fee, the amount to be based on the size of the motor carrier's fleet. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, impose delinquency fees for failure to pay the fee on time. The bill would make other technical and conforming changes to the BIT Program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 34601 of the Vehicle Code proposed by AB 501 that would become operative if this bill and AB 501 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 500, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Enrolled measure version corrected.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 2. Page 3102.).

  6. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  7. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2252.).

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  12. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  16. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 1567.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 15).

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  25. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  27. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 75 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68201
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 75201
% of votes cast 96%3%0%1%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Ting — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Medina — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Correa — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 64102
Democratic 7000
Republican 2002
Total 73104
% of votes cast 94%1%0%5%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Chau — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Perea — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Linder — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 529 do?
Existing law establishes the Biennial Inspection of Terminals Program (BIT) to ensure the safe operation of certain vehicles by a motor carrier through the inspection of these vehicles at the motor carrier's terminal by the Department of the California Highway Patrol. Existing law defines a motor carrier, for this purpose, as the registered owner of, and in some cases the lessee or person exclusively authorizing and directing the operation of, specified vehicles. Existing law requires, within 30 days of establishing a terminal, a motor carrier to schedule an inspection by submitting to the department an application for a terminal inspection accompanied by the payment of a fee the amount of which is based on the number of vehicles in a terminal or the "terminal fleet size." Existing law requires the department to inspect every terminal at least once every 25 months and defines a terminal as the location or locations designated by the motor carrier where subject vehicles and specific records are available for inspection. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, revise and recast these provisions as the Basic Inspection of Terminals (BIT) Program. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, authorize the department to conduct terminal inspections at any time. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2016, to implement a performance-based truck terminal inspection priority system similar to that used by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that would require the department to place an inspection priority on motor carrier terminals never previously inspected by the department. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2016, the department to create a database to include specified performance-based data and provide real-time information to the department regarding motor carrier performance, as specified. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, provide that the department is not required to inspect a terminal more than once every 6 years, if certain conditions apply, and provides that terminals that receive less than a satisfactory compliance rating would be subject to periodic inspections based on the severity of violations. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol, commencing January 30, 2017, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Department of Motor Vehicles the amount it expended for truck terminal inspections and roadside safety inspections. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to compare those expenditures to the amounts collected for carrier inspection fees, as specified, and, commencing July 1, 2017, and every 5 years thereafter, adjust the carrier inspection fee to ensure that the net revenues from the carrier inspection fee are sufficient to cover the Department of the California Highway Patrol's reasonable costs for those activities. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature in this regard. Existing law provides that it is a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate a vehicle without having submitted an inspection application and the required fees to the department, as specified. This bill would revise those provisions to, commencing January 1, 2016, make it a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate any of specified types of vehicles without identifying to the department all terminals in this state where vehicles may be inspected by the department and where vehicle inspection and maintenance records and driver records will be made available for inspection. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, require the lessor of certain vehicles to make vehicles available for inspection upon request of an authorized representative of the department in the course of inspecting the terminal of the lessee. The bill would make a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, make it a misdemeanor for a motor carrier to operate or cause to be operated any of specified vehicles unless the motor carrier is knowledgeable of, and in compliance with, all applicable statutes and regulations. By expanding the provisions of existing law, the violation of which is an offense, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, require a motor carrier to make vehicles and records available for inspection upon request by the department and to pay a carrier inspection fee, the amount to be based on the size of the motor carrier's fleet. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2016, impose delinquency fees for failure to pay the fee on time. The bill would make other technical and conforming changes to the BIT Program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 34601 of the Vehicle Code proposed by AB 501 that would become operative if this bill and AB 501 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 529?
AB 529 is sponsored by Lowenthal, Josh (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 529?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 529?
Track AB 529 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 529

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 529

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →