SB 944 — Surplus state property.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 515, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of General Services to dispose of surplus state real property in a specified manner, including, but not limited to, prescribing the priority of disposition of the property before the department offers it for sale to private entities or individuals. Existing law declares that the provision of decent housing for all Californians is a state goal of the highest priority and that priority be given to the disposal of surplus state real property to housing for persons and families of low or moderate income. Existing law requires a local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor, in order to be considered as a potential priority buyer of certain surplus state real property, as defined, to, among other things, demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the department, that the surplus state real property, or a portion of that surplus state real property, is to be used by the local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor for open space, public parks, affordable housing projects, development of projects that create sustainable employment opportunities of benefit to the area and region where the property is located, or development of local government-owned facilities. This bill would require a local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor that wishes to be considered a priority buyer of the state real property known as Lanterman Developmental Center, located in Pomona, Los Angeles County, which has been declared to be surplus state real property, to additionally demonstrate to the department that the local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor will use the property for the development of projects that create sustainable employment opportunities of benefit to the area and region where the property is located. This bill would, notwithstanding any other law, additionally prohibit that property from being prezoned, zoned, or rezoned unless the Department of General Services requests that the property be rezoned or approves the rezoning of the property. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Lanterman Developmental Center.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/20/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 20, 2014
- Enrolled 08/28/14 - Enrolled pdf August 28, 2014
- Amended 08/18/14 - Amended Assembly pdf August 18, 2014
- Amended 06/18/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 18, 2014
- Amended 06/11/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 11, 2014
- Amended 03/12/14 - Amended Senate pdf March 12, 2014
- Introduced 02/05/14 - Introduced pdf February 05, 2014
- SB944 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 515, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 4872.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 69. Noes 6. Page 6417.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 2.) (August 14).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Assembly Rule 56 (pending re-referral to L. Gov.) suspended. (Page 5488.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3418.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3091.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 8.
-
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Torres · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Torres
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 8% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Nay |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 12% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 944 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of General Services to dispose of surplus state real property in a specified manner, including, but not limited to, prescribing the priority of disposition of the property before the department offers it for sale to private entities or individuals. Existing law declares that the provision of decent housing for all Californians is a state goal of the highest priority and that priority be given to the disposal of surplus state real property to housing for persons and families of low or moderate income. Existing law requires a local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor, in order to be considered as a potential priority buyer of certain surplus state real property, as defined, to, among other things, demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the department, that the surplus state real property, or a portion of that surplus state real property, is to be used by the local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor for open space, public parks, affordable housing projects, development of projects that create sustainable employment opportunities of benefit to the area and region where the property is located, or development of local government-owned facilities. This bill would require a local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor that wishes to be considered a priority buyer of the state real property known as Lanterman Developmental Center, located in Pomona, Los Angeles County, which has been declared to be surplus state real property, to additionally demonstrate to the department that the local agency or nonprofit affordable housing sponsor will use the property for the development of projects that create sustainable employment opportunities of benefit to the area and region where the property is located. This bill would, notwithstanding any other law, additionally prohibit that property from being prezoned, zoned, or rezoned unless the Department of General Services requests that the property be rezoned or approves the rezoning of the property. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Lanterman Developmental Center.
- Who sponsors SB 944?
- SB 944 is sponsored by Torres.
- What is the current status of SB 944?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 944?
- Track SB 944 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 944
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 944
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →