California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1899 — Residential care facilities for the elderly.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 700, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law sets forth the qualifications of a licensee and requires a license to be forfeited by operation of law when the licensee abandons the facility. Existing law also authorizes the department to deny an application for, or to suspend or revoke a license upon specified grounds, including conduct inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of an individual in or receiving services from a facility. Existing law authorizes a person whose license has been revoked to petition the department for reinstatement of the license after one year has elapsed since the revocation. Under existing law, if an application for a license indicates that the applicant was previously issued a license to operate a residential care facility for the elderly or specified other licenses, and that license was revoked within the last 2 years, the department is required to cease reviewing the application until 2 years has elapsed since the revocation. This bill would additionally exclude a licensee, who abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. Existing law requires a licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of a license forfeiture due to abandonment of the facility, among other things, or due to a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department's regulations, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, to minimize possible transfer trauma, and to take specified actions. A licensee who fails to comply with these requirements is subject to certain penalties, including, but not limited to, civil penalties in the amount of $100 per violation per day for each day that the licensee is in violation, until the violation has been corrected. This bill, on and after January 1, 2015, would additionally exclude a licensee, who fails to comply with the above provisions and abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code as proposed by either AB 1477 or SB 873 of the 2013–14 Regular Session that would only become operative if either AB 1477 or SB 873 is enacted and becomes effective immediately, either bill amends Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code, and this bill is enacted after either bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 700, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6563.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6550.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4854.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.

  12. In Senate. Held at Desk.

  13. Ordered to the Senate.

  14. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4377.).

  16. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  17. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  18. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 24).

  20. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  21. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  22. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5256.)

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).

  26. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  27. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.

  29. Read second time and amended.

  30. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8).

  31. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  32. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  33. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  34. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  35. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Brown · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Brown

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71001
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Gray — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Medina — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31006
Democratic 2001
Total 33007
% of votes cast 83%0%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Knight — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Leno — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Hernandez — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Consent Calendar 2nd

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democratic 2001
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Beall — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Huff — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70002
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Medina — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Daly — Yea
Campos — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Logue — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Allen — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Pan — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Williams — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Frazier — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Linder — Yea
Pan — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1899 do?
Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law sets forth the qualifications of a licensee and requires a license to be forfeited by operation of law when the licensee abandons the facility. Existing law also authorizes the department to deny an application for, or to suspend or revoke a license upon specified grounds, including conduct inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of an individual in or receiving services from a facility. Existing law authorizes a person whose license has been revoked to petition the department for reinstatement of the license after one year has elapsed since the revocation. Under existing law, if an application for a license indicates that the applicant was previously issued a license to operate a residential care facility for the elderly or specified other licenses, and that license was revoked within the last 2 years, the department is required to cease reviewing the application until 2 years has elapsed since the revocation. This bill would additionally exclude a licensee, who abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. Existing law requires a licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of a license forfeiture due to abandonment of the facility, among other things, or due to a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department's regulations, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, to minimize possible transfer trauma, and to take specified actions. A licensee who fails to comply with these requirements is subject to certain penalties, including, but not limited to, civil penalties in the amount of $100 per violation per day for each day that the licensee is in violation, until the violation has been corrected. This bill, on and after January 1, 2015, would additionally exclude a licensee, who fails to comply with the above provisions and abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code as proposed by either AB 1477 or SB 873 of the 2013–14 Regular Session that would only become operative if either AB 1477 or SB 873 is enacted and becomes effective immediately, either bill amends Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code, and this bill is enacted after either bill.
Who sponsors AB 1899?
AB 1899 is sponsored by Brown.
What is the current status of AB 1899?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1899?
Track AB 1899 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1899

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1899

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →