Residential care facilities for the elderly.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1899 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1899.
You're tracking AB 1899
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1899 — Residential care facilities for the elderly.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 700, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law sets forth the qualifications of a licensee and requires a license to be forfeited by operation of law when the licensee abandons the facility. Existing law also authorizes the department to deny an application for, or to suspend or revoke a license upon specified grounds, including conduct inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of an individual in or receiving services from a facility. Existing law authorizes a person whose license has been revoked to petition the department for reinstatement of the license after one year has elapsed since the revocation. Under existing law, if an application for a license indicates that the applicant was previously issued a license to operate a residential care facility for the elderly or specified other licenses, and that license was revoked within the last 2 years, the department is required to cease reviewing the application until 2 years has elapsed since the revocation. This bill would additionally exclude a licensee, who abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. Existing law requires a licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of a license forfeiture due to abandonment of the facility, among other things, or due to a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department's regulations, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, to minimize possible transfer trauma, and to take specified actions. A licensee who fails to comply with these requirements is subject to certain penalties, including, but not limited to, civil penalties in the amount of $100 per violation per day for each day that the licensee is in violation, until the violation has been corrected. This bill, on and after January 1, 2015, would additionally exclude a licensee, who fails to comply with the above provisions and abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code as proposed by either AB 1477 or SB 873 of the 2013–14 Regular Session that would only become operative if either AB 1477 or SB 873 is enacted and becomes effective immediately, either bill amends Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code, and this bill is enacted after either bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2014
- Enrolled 09/03/14 - Enrolled pdf September 03, 2014
- Amended 08/22/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 06/26/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2014
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 23, 2014
- Amended 04/22/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2014
- Amended 03/24/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 24, 2014
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
- AB1899 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 700, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6563.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6550.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4854.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
-
In Senate. Held at Desk.
-
Ordered to the Senate.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4377.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 24).
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5256.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Brown · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brown
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1899 do?
- Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law sets forth the qualifications of a licensee and requires a license to be forfeited by operation of law when the licensee abandons the facility. Existing law also authorizes the department to deny an application for, or to suspend or revoke a license upon specified grounds, including conduct inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of an individual in or receiving services from a facility. Existing law authorizes a person whose license has been revoked to petition the department for reinstatement of the license after one year has elapsed since the revocation. Under existing law, if an application for a license indicates that the applicant was previously issued a license to operate a residential care facility for the elderly or specified other licenses, and that license was revoked within the last 2 years, the department is required to cease reviewing the application until 2 years has elapsed since the revocation. This bill would additionally exclude a licensee, who abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. Existing law requires a licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of a license forfeiture due to abandonment of the facility, among other things, or due to a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department's regulations, to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely, to minimize possible transfer trauma, and to take specified actions. A licensee who fails to comply with these requirements is subject to certain penalties, including, but not limited to, civil penalties in the amount of $100 per violation per day for each day that the licensee is in violation, until the violation has been corrected. This bill, on and after January 1, 2015, would additionally exclude a licensee, who fails to comply with the above provisions and abandons the residential care facility for the elderly and the residents in care resulting in an immediate and substantial threat to the health and safety of the abandoned residents, from licensure in facilities licensed by the department without the right to petition for reinstatement. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code as proposed by either AB 1477 or SB 873 of the 2013–14 Regular Session that would only become operative if either AB 1477 or SB 873 is enacted and becomes effective immediately, either bill amends Section 1569.682 of the Health and Safety Code, and this bill is enacted after either bill.
- Who sponsors AB 1899?
- AB 1899 is sponsored by Brown.
- What is the current status of AB 1899?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1899?
- Track AB 1899 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1899
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1899
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →