SB 870 — Health.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 40, Statutes of 2014.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law makes provisions for programs relating to treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) . Under existing law, the Office of AIDS, in the State Department of Public Health, is the lead agency within the state responsible for coordinating state programs, services, and activities relating to HIV and AIDS and AIDS-related conditions. This bill would authorize the department to implement up to 4 demonstration projects that may operate for a period of up to 2 years to allow for innovative, evidence-based approaches to provide outreach, HIV and Hepatitis C screenings, and linkage to, and retention in, quality health care for the most vulnerable and underserved individuals with a high risk for HIV infection. The bill would require, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, the department to award funding, on a competitive basis, to a community-based organization or local health jurisdiction to operate a demonstration project, as specified. The bill would require the department, at the conclusion of the demonstration projects, to review the effectiveness of each demonstration project and determine whether the demonstration project model can be implemented on a statewide basis. (2) Existing law, the Song-Brown Health Care Workforce Training Act, establishes a state medical contract program with accredited medical schools, programs that train primary care physician's assistants, programs that train primary care nurse practitioners and registered nurses, hospitals, and other health care delivery systems. Existing law establishes the California Healthcare Workforce Policy Commission to, among other things, identify specific areas of the state where unmet priority needs for primary care family physicians and registered nurses exist and to make recommendations to the Director of Statewide Health Planning and Development with regard to the funding of specific programs. Existing law requires the director to select and contract on behalf of the state with accredited medical schools and the other above-described entities for the purpose of, among other things, training medical students and residents in the specialty of family practice, subject to criteria established by the commission. This bill would require, only until January 1, 2018, the director to select and contract on behalf of the state with accredited primary care or family medicine residency programs for the purpose of providing grants to support newly created residency positions, and would require the commission to review and make recommendations to the director concerning the provision of those grants. These provisions would be operative only if funds are appropriated for these purposes in the Budget Act of 2014. (3) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require the department to establish a 3-year pilot program in the County of Los Angeles that enables school districts to allow students enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care plans the ability to receive vision care services at the school site through the use of a mobile vision service provider. The bill would generally require the Medi-Cal managed care plans in the County of Los Angeles to, in consultation with the department, jointly identify and develop standards and participation criteria that the participating mobile vision service provider would be required to meet in order to be deemed qualified to participate in the pilot program. The bill would authorize the Director of Health Care Services to extend the pilot program to Medi-Cal managed care plans in other counties and applicable local jurisdictions, as specified. Existing law provides for a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program, which includes Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment for any individual under 21 years of age, consistent with the requirements of federal law. This bill would provide, only to the extent required by the federal government and effective no sooner than required by the federal government, that behavioral health treatment (BHT) , as defined, is a covered service for individuals under 21 years of age, as specified. The bill would require that the department only implement these provisions, or continue to implement these provisions, if the department receives all necessary federal approvals to obtain federal funds for the service, the department seeks an appropriation that would provide the necessary state funding estimated to be required for the applicable fiscal year, and the department consults with stakeholders. The bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature, to the extent the federal government requires BHT to be a covered Medi-Cal service, that the department seek statutory authority to implement this new benefit. Existing law also includes in the schedule of benefits for Medi-Cal prescribed drugs subject to the Medi-Cal list of contract drugs. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into contracts with manufacturers of single-source and multiple-source drugs, on a bid or nonbid basis, for drugs from each major therapeutic category. Existing law requires these contracts to provide for a state rebate to be remitted to the department quarterly. Existing law also requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide to the department a state rebate for any drug products that have been added to the Medi-Cal list of contract drugs related to drugs used to treat AIDS and cancer. Existing law requires that the utilization data to determine these rebates exclude data from specified entities and capitated plans. Existing law also requires the department to collect a state rebate for blood factors reimbursed by specified programs. This bill would make those data exclusions inoperative when the department takes specified actions, and would, commencing July 1, 2014, specify that utilization data used to determine the rebates include data from all health plans with specified exceptions. The bill would require the department to develop coverage policies, in consultation with clinical experts, Medi-Cal managed care plans, and other stakeholders, for prescription drugs that the department reimburses managed care plans through separate capitated rate payments or other supplemental payments. Existing federal law establishes the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) , which provides specified services for older individuals so that they may continue living in the community. Federal law authorizes states to implement the PACE program as a Medicaid state option. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into contracts with up to 15 PACE organizations, as defined, to implement the PACE program, as specified. Existing law requires the department to establish capitation rates paid to each PACE organization at no less than 90% of the fee-for-service equivalent cost, including the department's cost of administration, that the department estimates would be payable for all services covered under the PACE organization contract if all those services were to be furnished to Medi-Cal beneficiaries under the fee-for-service program. This bill would instead require, on and after April 1, 2015, that the department establish capitation rates paid to each PACE organization at no less than 95% of that amount. (4) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act a crime. Existing law establishes the Independent Medical Review System to make determinations when a health care service that is eligible for coverage has been denied, modified, or delayed by a decision of the plan, or by one of its contracting providers, in whole or in part due to a finding that the service is not medically necessary. Existing law requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to review individual cases submitted for independent medical review to determine whether any enforcement actions, including penalties, may be appropriate. This bill would prohibit the director from taking an enforcement action against a plan if the plan provides prescription drugs to a Medi-Cal beneficiary pursuant to State Department of Health Care Services guidelines. (5) This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the State Department of Health Care Services continue to monitor access to and utilization of Medi-Cal services in the fee-for-service and managed care settings during the 2014-15 fiscal year, as specified and would require the department to use this information to evaluate current reimbursement levels for Medi-Cal providers and to make recommendations for targeted changes to the extent the department finds those changes appropriate. (6) Item 4300-101-0001 of the Budget Act of 2009, as added by Chapter 1 of the 3rd Extraordinary Session, appropriated $24,553,000 to the State Department of Developmental Services for the support of the department, payable from the General Fund. Item 4300-101-0001 of the Budget Act of 2010, as added by Chapter 712 of the Statutes of 2010, appropriated $24,391,000 to the department for its support, payable from the General Fund. This bill would reappropriate the balances of those amounts to the department, subject to specified purposes, and would provide that those funds would be available for liquidation until June 30, 2015. The bill also would, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, appropriate $3,200,000 from the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for allocation to health benefit plans that meet specified requirements. This bill would, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, appropriate $3,750,000 from the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for purposes of electronic health records technical assistance in accordance with the State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan, as specified. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/20/14 - Chaptered Current pdf June 20, 2014
- Enrolled 06/17/14 - Enrolled pdf June 17, 2014
- Amended 06/13/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 13, 2014
- Introduced 01/09/14 - Introduced pdf January 09, 2014
- SB870 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 40, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 3909.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 5526.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 5515.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Page 5515.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 12. Page 3135.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 9.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 28% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 30% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 870 do?
- (1) Existing law makes provisions for programs relating to treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) . Under existing law, the Office of AIDS, in the State Department of Public Health, is the lead agency within the state responsible for coordinating state programs, services, and activities relating to HIV and AIDS and AIDS-related conditions. This bill would authorize the department to implement up to 4 demonstration projects that may operate for a period of up to 2 years to allow for innovative, evidence-based approaches to provide outreach, HIV and Hepatitis C screenings, and linkage to, and retention in, quality health care for the most vulnerable and underserved individuals with a high risk for HIV infection. The bill would require, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, the department to award funding, on a competitive basis, to a community-based organization or local health jurisdiction to operate a demonstration project, as specified. The bill would require the department, at the conclusion of the demonstration projects, to review the effectiveness of each demonstration project and determine whether the demonstration project model can be implemented on a statewide basis. (2) Existing law, the Song-Brown Health Care Workforce Training Act, establishes a state medical contract program with accredited medical schools, programs that train primary care physician's assistants, programs that train primary care nurse practitioners and registered nurses, hospitals, and other health care delivery systems. Existing law establishes the California Healthcare Workforce Policy Commission to, among other things, identify specific areas of the state where unmet priority needs for primary care family physicians and registered nurses exist and to make recommendations to the Director of Statewide Health Planning and Development with regard to the funding of specific programs. Existing law requires the director to select and contract on behalf of the state with accredited medical schools and the other above-described entities for the purpose of, among other things, training medical students and residents in the specialty of family practice, subject to criteria established by the commission. This bill would require, only until January 1, 2018, the director to select and contract on behalf of the state with accredited primary care or family medicine residency programs for the purpose of providing grants to support newly created residency positions, and would require the commission to review and make recommendations to the director concerning the provision of those grants. These provisions would be operative only if funds are appropriated for these purposes in the Budget Act of 2014. (3) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require the department to establish a 3-year pilot program in the County of Los Angeles that enables school districts to allow students enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care plans the ability to receive vision care services at the school site through the use of a mobile vision service provider. The bill would generally require the Medi-Cal managed care plans in the County of Los Angeles to, in consultation with the department, jointly identify and develop standards and participation criteria that the participating mobile vision service provider would be required to meet in order to be deemed qualified to participate in the pilot program. The bill would authorize the Director of Health Care Services to extend the pilot program to Medi-Cal managed care plans in other counties and applicable local jurisdictions, as specified. Existing law provides for a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program, which includes Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment for any individual under 21 years of age, consistent with the requirements of federal law. This bill would provide, only to the extent required by the federal government and effective no sooner than required by the federal government, that behavioral health treatment (BHT) , as defined, is a covered service for individuals under 21 years of age, as specified. The bill would require that the department only implement these provisions, or continue to implement these provisions, if the department receives all necessary federal approvals to obtain federal funds for the service, the department seeks an appropriation that would provide the necessary state funding estimated to be required for the applicable fiscal year, and the department consults with stakeholders. The bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature, to the extent the federal government requires BHT to be a covered Medi-Cal service, that the department seek statutory authority to implement this new benefit. Existing law also includes in the schedule of benefits for Medi-Cal prescribed drugs subject to the Medi-Cal list of contract drugs. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into contracts with manufacturers of single-source and multiple-source drugs, on a bid or nonbid basis, for drugs from each major therapeutic category. Existing law requires these contracts to provide for a state rebate to be remitted to the department quarterly. Existing law also requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide to the department a state rebate for any drug products that have been added to the Medi-Cal list of contract drugs related to drugs used to treat AIDS and cancer. Existing law requires that the utilization data to determine these rebates exclude data from specified entities and capitated plans. Existing law also requires the department to collect a state rebate for blood factors reimbursed by specified programs. This bill would make those data exclusions inoperative when the department takes specified actions, and would, commencing July 1, 2014, specify that utilization data used to determine the rebates include data from all health plans with specified exceptions. The bill would require the department to develop coverage policies, in consultation with clinical experts, Medi-Cal managed care plans, and other stakeholders, for prescription drugs that the department reimburses managed care plans through separate capitated rate payments or other supplemental payments. Existing federal law establishes the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) , which provides specified services for older individuals so that they may continue living in the community. Federal law authorizes states to implement the PACE program as a Medicaid state option. Existing law authorizes the department to enter into contracts with up to 15 PACE organizations, as defined, to implement the PACE program, as specified. Existing law requires the department to establish capitation rates paid to each PACE organization at no less than 90% of the fee-for-service equivalent cost, including the department's cost of administration, that the department estimates would be payable for all services covered under the PACE organization contract if all those services were to be furnished to Medi-Cal beneficiaries under the fee-for-service program. This bill would instead require, on and after April 1, 2015, that the department establish capitation rates paid to each PACE organization at no less than 95% of that amount. (4) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act a crime. Existing law establishes the Independent Medical Review System to make determinations when a health care service that is eligible for coverage has been denied, modified, or delayed by a decision of the plan, or by one of its contracting providers, in whole or in part due to a finding that the service is not medically necessary. Existing law requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to review individual cases submitted for independent medical review to determine whether any enforcement actions, including penalties, may be appropriate. This bill would prohibit the director from taking an enforcement action against a plan if the plan provides prescription drugs to a Medi-Cal beneficiary pursuant to State Department of Health Care Services guidelines. (5) This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the State Department of Health Care Services continue to monitor access to and utilization of Medi-Cal services in the fee-for-service and managed care settings during the 2014-15 fiscal year, as specified and would require the department to use this information to evaluate current reimbursement levels for Medi-Cal providers and to make recommendations for targeted changes to the extent the department finds those changes appropriate. (6) Item 4300-101-0001 of the Budget Act of 2009, as added by Chapter 1 of the 3rd Extraordinary Session, appropriated $24,553,000 to the State Department of Developmental Services for the support of the department, payable from the General Fund. Item 4300-101-0001 of the Budget Act of 2010, as added by Chapter 712 of the Statutes of 2010, appropriated $24,391,000 to the department for its support, payable from the General Fund. This bill would reappropriate the balances of those amounts to the department, subject to specified purposes, and would provide that those funds would be available for liquidation until June 30, 2015. The bill also would, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, appropriate $3,200,000 from the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for allocation to health benefit plans that meet specified requirements. This bill would, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, appropriate $3,750,000 from the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for purposes of electronic health records technical assistance in accordance with the State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan, as specified. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 870?
- SB 870 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 870?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 870?
- Track SB 870 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 870
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 870
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →