Redevelopment: successor agencies: postcompliance provisions: loans.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1582 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1582.
You're tracking AB 1582
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1582 — Redevelopment: successor agencies: postcompliance provisions: loans.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Community Redevelopment Law authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires a successor agency to, among other things, prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for payments on enforceable obligations for each 6-month fiscal period. Under existing law, the Department of Finance is authorized to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency that completes specified requirements. Upon receiving a finding of completion, the successor agency is authorized to participate in a loan repayment program and limited property management activities. Under existing law, after the successor agency receives a finding of completion, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency are deemed to be enforceable obligations, provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes. This bill would require the interest rate on the amount of principal calculated from the loan origination date, and any increase thereto that remains unpaid as of the date of oversight board approval of the loan as an enforceable obligation, to be subject to an adjusted interest rate, as prescribed. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 2493 and SB 1129 that would become operative if this bill and either AB 2493 and SB 1129, or both, are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/22/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 06/17/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2014
- Amended 06/02/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 02, 2014
- Amended 04/22/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2014
- Amended 04/03/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 03, 2014
- Introduced 02/03/14 - Introduced pdf February 03, 2014
- AB1582 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 11).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 2. Page 4940.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (April 30).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mullin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mullin
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 3% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1582 do?
- The Community Redevelopment Law authorized the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires a successor agency to, among other things, prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for payments on enforceable obligations for each 6-month fiscal period. Under existing law, the Department of Finance is authorized to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency that completes specified requirements. Upon receiving a finding of completion, the successor agency is authorized to participate in a loan repayment program and limited property management activities. Under existing law, after the successor agency receives a finding of completion, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency are deemed to be enforceable obligations, provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes. This bill would require the interest rate on the amount of principal calculated from the loan origination date, and any increase thereto that remains unpaid as of the date of oversight board approval of the loan as an enforceable obligation, to be subject to an adjusted interest rate, as prescribed. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 2493 and SB 1129 that would become operative if this bill and either AB 2493 and SB 1129, or both, are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
- Who sponsors AB 1582?
- AB 1582 is sponsored by Mullin.
- What is the current status of AB 1582?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1582?
- Track AB 1582 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1582
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1582
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →