Los Angeles Unified School District: best value procurement: pilot program.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1971 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1971.
You're tracking AB 1971
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1971 — Los Angeles Unified School District: best value procurement: pilot program.
Last action — Died on third reading file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Local Agency Public Construction Act requires the governing board of any school district to let any contract for a public project, as defined, involving an expenditure of $15,000 or more, to the lowest responsible bidder that gives security as the board requires, or else reject all bids. This bill would establish a pilot program to authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to use, before January 1, 2017, a best value procurement method for bid evaluation and selection for public projects that exceed $1,000,000. The bill would establish various requirements applicable to the use of the best value procurement method under this authorization. The bill would require the school district to submit an interim and final report to the Legislative Analyst, and would require the Legislative Analyst to submit an interim and final report to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature on the use of the procurement method pursuant to the bill, in accordance with a specified schedule. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2020. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/02/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf July 02, 2014
- Amended 06/18/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 18, 2014
- Amended 05/14/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 14, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
- AB1971 View text html
Action History
-
Died on third reading file.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 4).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 25).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on ED. and APPR.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 5099.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bocanegra · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bocanegra
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 14% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 14 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 17 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 22% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1971 do?
- The Local Agency Public Construction Act requires the governing board of any school district to let any contract for a public project, as defined, involving an expenditure of $15,000 or more, to the lowest responsible bidder that gives security as the board requires, or else reject all bids. This bill would establish a pilot program to authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to use, before January 1, 2017, a best value procurement method for bid evaluation and selection for public projects that exceed $1,000,000. The bill would establish various requirements applicable to the use of the best value procurement method under this authorization. The bill would require the school district to submit an interim and final report to the Legislative Analyst, and would require the Legislative Analyst to submit an interim and final report to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature on the use of the procurement method pursuant to the bill, in accordance with a specified schedule. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2020. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
- Who sponsors AB 1971?
- AB 1971 is sponsored by Bocanegra.
- What is the current status of AB 1971?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1971?
- Track AB 1971 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1971
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1971
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →