School plans: consolidated application for categorical programs: single plan for pupil achievement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2380 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2380.
You're tracking AB 2380
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2380 — School plans: consolidated application for categorical programs: single plan for pupil achievement.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a school district that elects to apply for certain state and federal categorical program funds to submit to the State Department of Education a single consolidated application, referencing a duly adopted single plan for pupil achievement, for approval by the State Board of Education. Related onsite school and district compliance visits and reviews are conducted by the department. Existing law requires a single plan for pupil achievement to be reviewed annually and updated by the schoolsite council or, if the school does not have a schoolsite council, by schoolwide advisory groups or school support groups to include proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish the process and frequency for conducting reviews of district achievement and compliance with state and federal categorical program requirements. This bill would add to these provisions references to programs funded through the local control funding formula and to districtwide advisory committees on bilingual education. The bill would no longer authorize a specified action plan to satisfy the requirements of a single plan for pupil achievement. The bill would require school districts to develop local control and accountability plans and annual updates in consultation with schoolsite level advisory groups and ensure that the local control and accountability plan and its specific actions are consistent with, and reflective of, the goals and plans of schoolsites. The bill would require the department, if it makes materials or information available to school districts to assist them in the development of their single plan for pupil achievement, to ensure that all materials and information emphasize that the plan be consistent with and, to the extent possible, support the goals and outcomes specified in the school district's local control and accountability plan. The bill would require, when a single plan for pupil achievement is being reviewed annually and updated by the schoolsite council or, if the school does not have a schoolsite council, by schoolwide advisory groups or school support groups, the single plan to additionally include alignment with the school district's local control and accountability plan and a minimization of the duplication of efforts. The bill would also make conforming and other nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 64001 of the Education Code proposed by AB 2384 that would become operative if this bill and AB 2384 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/03/14 - Enrolled Current pdf September 03, 2014
- Amended 08/21/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 21, 2014
- Amended 08/19/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 19, 2014
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 23, 2014
- Amended 05/01/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 01, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2380 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6565.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6550.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4854.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5272.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Weber · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Weber
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2380 do?
- Existing law requires a school district that elects to apply for certain state and federal categorical program funds to submit to the State Department of Education a single consolidated application, referencing a duly adopted single plan for pupil achievement, for approval by the State Board of Education. Related onsite school and district compliance visits and reviews are conducted by the department. Existing law requires a single plan for pupil achievement to be reviewed annually and updated by the schoolsite council or, if the school does not have a schoolsite council, by schoolwide advisory groups or school support groups to include proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish the process and frequency for conducting reviews of district achievement and compliance with state and federal categorical program requirements. This bill would add to these provisions references to programs funded through the local control funding formula and to districtwide advisory committees on bilingual education. The bill would no longer authorize a specified action plan to satisfy the requirements of a single plan for pupil achievement. The bill would require school districts to develop local control and accountability plans and annual updates in consultation with schoolsite level advisory groups and ensure that the local control and accountability plan and its specific actions are consistent with, and reflective of, the goals and plans of schoolsites. The bill would require the department, if it makes materials or information available to school districts to assist them in the development of their single plan for pupil achievement, to ensure that all materials and information emphasize that the plan be consistent with and, to the extent possible, support the goals and outcomes specified in the school district's local control and accountability plan. The bill would require, when a single plan for pupil achievement is being reviewed annually and updated by the schoolsite council or, if the school does not have a schoolsite council, by schoolwide advisory groups or school support groups, the single plan to additionally include alignment with the school district's local control and accountability plan and a minimization of the duplication of efforts. The bill would also make conforming and other nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 64001 of the Education Code proposed by AB 2384 that would become operative if this bill and AB 2384 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.
- Who sponsors AB 2380?
- AB 2380 is sponsored by Weber.
- What is the current status of AB 2380?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2380?
- Track AB 2380 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2380
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2380
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →