California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 91 — School finance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, if enacted, would require state funding for county superintendents of schools and school districts, and charter schools that previously received a general-purpose entitlement, to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session (A) would require the state funding apportioned to school districts and charter schools to be based on a base grant, as specified, (B) would require, among other things, the base grant for grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to be adjusted by an additional 2.6%, as adjusted for inflation, and (C) would require the 2.6% base grant adjustment to be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness, as specified. This bill would, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, delete the requirement that the 2.6% base grant adjustment be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to provisions related to the local control funding formula. (2) Assembly Bill 110 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, also known as the Budget Act of 2013, would, if enacted, appropriate $10,000,000 to Section A of the State School Fund for the support of the California Local Control Accountability Support Network. This bill would instead, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, discussed above, appropriate the $10,000,000 for support of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. By authorizing funds appropriated to a continuously appropriated fund to be used for a different purpose, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6:15 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 1487.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 13. Noes 1. Page 1468.)

  6. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  7. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 14. Page 2104.) Ordered to the Senate.

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 2100.)

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  13. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 897.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Ordered to second reading.

  18. Withdrawn from committee.

  19. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  20. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  21. (Corrected May 9).

  22. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 38 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35100
Democratic 3000
Total 38100
% of votes cast 97%3%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
De León — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wright — Yea
Hill — Yea
Monning — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12102
Democratic 1000
Total 13102
% of votes cast 81%6%0%13%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Roth — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Wyland — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 64 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58901
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 641401
% of votes cast 81%18%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Melendez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Stone — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Levine — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chau — Yea
Hagman — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Logue — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 9 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22904
Democratic 2001
Total 24905
% of votes cast 63%24%0%13%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wright — Yea
De León — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 91 do?
(1) Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, if enacted, would require state funding for county superintendents of schools and school districts, and charter schools that previously received a general-purpose entitlement, to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session (A) would require the state funding apportioned to school districts and charter schools to be based on a base grant, as specified, (B) would require, among other things, the base grant for grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to be adjusted by an additional 2.6%, as adjusted for inflation, and (C) would require the 2.6% base grant adjustment to be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness, as specified. This bill would, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, delete the requirement that the 2.6% base grant adjustment be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to provisions related to the local control funding formula. (2) Assembly Bill 110 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, also known as the Budget Act of 2013, would, if enacted, appropriate $10,000,000 to Section A of the State School Fund for the support of the California Local Control Accountability Support Network. This bill would instead, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, discussed above, appropriate the $10,000,000 for support of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. By authorizing funds appropriated to a continuously appropriated fund to be used for a different purpose, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 91?
SB 91 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 91?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 91?
Track SB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 91

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 91

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →