School finance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 91 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 91.
You're tracking SB 91
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 91 — School finance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, if enacted, would require state funding for county superintendents of schools and school districts, and charter schools that previously received a general-purpose entitlement, to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session (A) would require the state funding apportioned to school districts and charter schools to be based on a base grant, as specified, (B) would require, among other things, the base grant for grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to be adjusted by an additional 2.6%, as adjusted for inflation, and (C) would require the 2.6% base grant adjustment to be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness, as specified. This bill would, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, delete the requirement that the 2.6% base grant adjustment be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to provisions related to the local control funding formula. (2) Assembly Bill 110 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, also known as the Budget Act of 2013, would, if enacted, appropriate $10,000,000 to Section A of the State School Fund for the support of the California Local Control Accountability Support Network. This bill would instead, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, discussed above, appropriate the $10,000,000 for support of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. By authorizing funds appropriated to a continuously appropriated fund to be used for a different purpose, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/01/13 - Chaptered Current pdf July 01, 2013
- Enrolled 06/24/13 - Enrolled pdf June 24, 2013
- Amended 06/18/13 - Amended Assembly pdf June 18, 2013
- Amended 06/12/13 - Amended Assembly pdf June 12, 2013
- Introduced 01/10/13 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2013
- SB91 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6:15 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 1487.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 13. Noes 1. Page 1468.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 14. Page 2104.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 2100.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 897.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.
-
(Corrected May 9).
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 6% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 18% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 24% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 91 do?
- (1) Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, if enacted, would require state funding for county superintendents of schools and school districts, and charter schools that previously received a general-purpose entitlement, to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session (A) would require the state funding apportioned to school districts and charter schools to be based on a base grant, as specified, (B) would require, among other things, the base grant for grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to be adjusted by an additional 2.6%, as adjusted for inflation, and (C) would require the 2.6% base grant adjustment to be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness, as specified. This bill would, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, delete the requirement that the 2.6% base grant adjustment be used on pupils enrolled in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, for any purposes or programs that support a school district or charter school in achieving its goals for college and career readiness. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to provisions related to the local control funding formula. (2) Assembly Bill 110 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, also known as the Budget Act of 2013, would, if enacted, appropriate $10,000,000 to Section A of the State School Fund for the support of the California Local Control Accountability Support Network. This bill would instead, contingent on the enactment of Assembly Bill 97 of the 2013–14 Regular Session, discussed above, appropriate the $10,000,000 for support of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. By authorizing funds appropriated to a continuously appropriated fund to be used for a different purpose, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 91?
- SB 91 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 91?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 91?
- Track SB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 91
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 91
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →