AB 1578 — Health: The California Health Benefit Review Program.
Last action — Died at Desk.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess legislation that proposes to mandate or repeal a mandated health benefit or service, as defined. Existing law requests the University of California, to provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature within 60 days after receiving a request for the analysis. Existing law also requests that the university report to the Governor and the Legislature on the implementation of the program by January 1, 2014. This bill would request the University of California to include essential health benefits and the impact on the California Health Benefit Exchange in the analysis prepared under the program. The bill would further request that the University of California assess legislation that impacts health insurance benefit design, cost sharing, premiums, and other health insurance topics. The bill would request that the university provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature not later than 60 days, or in a manner and pursuant to a timeline agreed to by the Legislature and the program, after receiving the request, as specified. The bill would also extend the date by which the university is requested to report to the Governor and the Legislature on the implementation program until January 1, 2016. Existing law establishes the Health Care Benefits Fund to support the university in implementing the program. Existing law imposes an annual charge on health care service plans and health insurers, as specified, to be deposited into the fund. Existing law prohibits the total annual assessment pursuant to that provision from exceeding $2,000,000. Under existing law, the fund and the program are repealed as of June 30, 2015. This bill would extend until June 30, 2016, the operative date of the program and the fund, including the annual charge on health care service plans and health insurers. The bill would repeal the above-described provisions as of June 30, 2016. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/19/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 19, 2014
- Amended 05/27/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 27, 2014
- Amended 04/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2014
- Introduced 01/30/14 - Introduced pdf January 30, 2014
- AB1578 View text html
Action History
-
Died at Desk.
-
In Assembly. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 5007.).
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5001.)
-
Joint Rule 61 suspended. (Page 5001.)
-
Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1,
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 23. Page 5365.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Further hearing to be set.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gordon · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Pan · Primary
- Ting · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pan
Co-sponsors (3)
- Gordon
- Lieu
- Ting
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 3% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 23 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 29% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 31% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1578 do?
- Existing law establishes the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess legislation that proposes to mandate or repeal a mandated health benefit or service, as defined. Existing law requests the University of California, to provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature within 60 days after receiving a request for the analysis. Existing law also requests that the university report to the Governor and the Legislature on the implementation of the program by January 1, 2014. This bill would request the University of California to include essential health benefits and the impact on the California Health Benefit Exchange in the analysis prepared under the program. The bill would further request that the University of California assess legislation that impacts health insurance benefit design, cost sharing, premiums, and other health insurance topics. The bill would request that the university provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature not later than 60 days, or in a manner and pursuant to a timeline agreed to by the Legislature and the program, after receiving the request, as specified. The bill would also extend the date by which the university is requested to report to the Governor and the Legislature on the implementation program until January 1, 2016. Existing law establishes the Health Care Benefits Fund to support the university in implementing the program. Existing law imposes an annual charge on health care service plans and health insurers, as specified, to be deposited into the fund. Existing law prohibits the total annual assessment pursuant to that provision from exceeding $2,000,000. Under existing law, the fund and the program are repealed as of June 30, 2015. This bill would extend until June 30, 2016, the operative date of the program and the fund, including the annual charge on health care service plans and health insurers. The bill would repeal the above-described provisions as of June 30, 2016. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1578?
- AB 1578 is sponsored by Gordon, Lieu, Pan, and Ting.
- What is the current status of AB 1578?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1578?
- Track AB 1578 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1578
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1578
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →