SB 211 — Tax administration: disclosure of information: Franchise Tax Board and cities.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 513, Statutes of 2013.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes, until December 31, 2013, a city that has entered into a reciprocal agreement, as defined, with the Franchise Tax Board, to exchange tax information, as provided. Existing law limits the use of the tax data received from the Franchise Tax Board to business tax administration purposes and provides that any other use or disclosure of the information is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would extend the authorization until January 1, 2019, and extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the reciprocal agreements between the Franchise Tax Board and cities. This bill would add an additional limitation on the use of the tax data to require the data to be utilized in a form and manner to safeguard the tax information, as prescribed. Because this bill would continue the operation of the reciprocal agreement exchange, and the unauthorized use of such information would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/03/13 - Chaptered Current pdf October 03, 2013
- Enrolled 09/16/13 - Enrolled pdf September 16, 2013
- Amended 09/03/13 - Amended Assembly pdf September 03, 2013
- Amended 08/13/13 - Amended Assembly pdf August 13, 2013
- Amended 05/08/13 - Amended Senate pdf May 08, 2013
- Introduced 02/11/13 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2013
- SB211 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 513, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 2375.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 3178.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 30).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 2504.)
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 6. Page 1092.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 989.) (May 20).
-
Set for hearing May 20.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 751.) (May 1).
-
Set for hearing May 1.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 19 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 28% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 15% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 211 do?
- Existing law authorizes, until December 31, 2013, a city that has entered into a reciprocal agreement, as defined, with the Franchise Tax Board, to exchange tax information, as provided. Existing law limits the use of the tax data received from the Franchise Tax Board to business tax administration purposes and provides that any other use or disclosure of the information is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would extend the authorization until January 1, 2019, and extend the repeal date of the provisions relating to the reciprocal agreements between the Franchise Tax Board and cities. This bill would add an additional limitation on the use of the tax data to require the data to be utilized in a form and manner to safeguard the tax information, as prescribed. Because this bill would continue the operation of the reciprocal agreement exchange, and the unauthorized use of such information would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 211?
- SB 211 is sponsored by Hernandez.
- What is the current status of SB 211?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 211?
- Track SB 211 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 211
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 211
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →