Packaging and labeling: containers: slack fill.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 465 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 465.
You're tracking SB 465
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 465 — Packaging and labeling: containers: slack fill.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 429, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Department of Food and Agriculture and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, enforcement of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. The act prohibits specified persons from distributing any packaged commodity that is not in conformity with prescribed packaging and labeling requirements, except as provided. The act prohibits a container wherein commodities are packed to have a false bottom, false sidewalls, false lid or covering, or to be constructed or filled as to facilitate the perpetration of deception or fraud. The act prohibits a commodities container, or a food container subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act from being made, formed, or filled as to be misleading. The act provides that a container that does not allow a consumer to fully view its contents violates this provision if it contains nonfunctional slack fill. The act provides that nonfunctional slack fill is the empty space in a package that is filled to less than its capacity for other than specified reasons. However, existing law provides that these state provisions regarding food containers are operative only to the extent they are identical to specified federal requirements. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, also provides for the regulation by the State Department of Public Health of the packaging and labeling of foods, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, and provides requirements for containers containing these commodities that are similar to the requirements for containers under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. This bill would instead define nonfunctional slack fill for all of these provisions as the empty space in a package that is filled to substantially less than its capacity for other than any one or more of the applicable reasons. The bill would provide that slack fill in a package shall not be used as grounds to allege a violation of the applicable provisions based solely on its presence in any of these types of packages unless it is nonfunctional slack fill, except that, for food containers, this would be operative only to the extent it is identical to the federal requirement.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/13 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2013
- Enrolled 09/12/13 - Enrolled pdf September 12, 2013
- Amended 09/04/13 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2013
- Amended 08/19/13 - Amended Assembly pdf August 19, 2013
- Amended 08/07/13 - Amended Assembly pdf August 07, 2013
- Amended 04/23/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 23, 2013
- Amended 04/16/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 16, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- SB465 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 429, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2290.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2998.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Page 2864.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 13).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
-
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and B.,P. & C.P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1187.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 817.) (May 6).
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Correa · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Correa
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 465 do?
- Existing law establishes the Department of Food and Agriculture and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, enforcement of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. The act prohibits specified persons from distributing any packaged commodity that is not in conformity with prescribed packaging and labeling requirements, except as provided. The act prohibits a container wherein commodities are packed to have a false bottom, false sidewalls, false lid or covering, or to be constructed or filled as to facilitate the perpetration of deception or fraud. The act prohibits a commodities container, or a food container subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act from being made, formed, or filled as to be misleading. The act provides that a container that does not allow a consumer to fully view its contents violates this provision if it contains nonfunctional slack fill. The act provides that nonfunctional slack fill is the empty space in a package that is filled to less than its capacity for other than specified reasons. However, existing law provides that these state provisions regarding food containers are operative only to the extent they are identical to specified federal requirements. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, also provides for the regulation by the State Department of Public Health of the packaging and labeling of foods, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, and provides requirements for containers containing these commodities that are similar to the requirements for containers under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. This bill would instead define nonfunctional slack fill for all of these provisions as the empty space in a package that is filled to substantially less than its capacity for other than any one or more of the applicable reasons. The bill would provide that slack fill in a package shall not be used as grounds to allege a violation of the applicable provisions based solely on its presence in any of these types of packages unless it is nonfunctional slack fill, except that, for food containers, this would be operative only to the extent it is identical to the federal requirement.
- Who sponsors SB 465?
- SB 465 is sponsored by Correa.
- What is the current status of SB 465?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 465?
- Track SB 465 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 465
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 465
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →