California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 89 — Developmental services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 25, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law vests the State Department of Developmental Services with jurisdiction over state hospitals, referred to as developmental centers, for the provision of care to persons with developmental disabilities. Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires that treatment, services, and supports be provided in natural community settings to the maximum extent possible, and authorizes the department to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency to submit to the Legislature a master plan for the future of developmental centers by November 15, 2013. The bill would also require the agency to submit, by January 10, 2014, a report to the Legislature regarding, among other things, the ability of community resources to meet the specialized needs of residents now living in developmental centers. (2) Under existing law, every developmentally disabled person who is admitted or committed to a state hospital, developmental center, community care facility, health facility, or other placement has a right to a hearing by writ of habeas corpus for his or her release after a request for release is made to any employee of the center or facility. Existing law requires that at the time the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is filed with the court, the clerk of the court transmit a copy of the petition, together with notification as to the time and place of an evidentiary hearing in the matter, to the parent or conservator of the person seeking release or for whom release is sought and to the director of the appropriate regional center. This bill would require the clerk of the court to provide the above-described notice and petition to the clients' rights advocate of the appropriate regional center, and would authorize that advocate to attend these hearings to assist in protecting the individual's rights. By imposing this additional duty on court clerks, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Under existing law, the services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan, developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. This bill would authorize a regional center to pay any applicable copayment or coinsurance for a service and support required by a consumer's individual program plan if the service is paid for by the health care service plan or health insurance policy of the consumer or his or her parent, guardian, or caregiver and specified conditions are met. The bill would prohibit a regional center from paying health care service plan or health insurance policy deductibles. (4) Existing law requires the State Department of Developmental Services and the regional centers to annually collaborate to compile data relating to purchase of service authorization, utilization, and expenditure by each regional center, as specified. Under existing law, the department and each regional center is required to post this data on their respective Internet Web sites by December 31 of each year, and requires each regional center to hold a public meeting with stakeholders regarding the data within 3 months of its compilation. This bill would require each regional center to inform the department regarding the scheduling of those public meetings, and to post a notice of a meeting on its Internet Web site 30 days prior to the meeting. The bill would also require the department to post a notice of the meeting on its Internet Web site. The bill would further require the department and the regional centers to annually collaborate to determine the most appropriate methods to collect and compile data related to the payment of copayments and coinsurance by each regional center. (5) Existing law requires the State Department of Developmental Services to establish policies and procedures for the development of an annual community placement plan by regional centers. Existing law also requires the department to establish a statewide specialized resource service to reduce reliance on out-of-state placements and developmental centers and mental health facilities for which federal funding is not available. Existing law requires regional centers to complete a comprehensive assessment of specified consumers residing in developmental centers, and requires that this assessment be provided to the individual program planning team in order to assist the planning team in determining the least restrictive environment for the consumer. This bill would require the regional center to also provide, to the extent appropriate, relevant information from the statewide specialized resource service to the individual program planning team. The bill would also require that the clients' rights advocate for the regional center be notified of each individual program plan meeting that includes discussion of the results of the assessment, and would authorize the advocate to participate in the meeting unless the consumer objects on his or her own behalf. (6) Existing law prohibits a regional center from purchasing new residential services from institutions for mental disease for which federal Medicaid funding is not available, except in emergencies, as specified. Existing law limits these emergency placements to 180 days. This bill would additionally prohibit the placement of a consumer in an institution for mental disease regardless of the availability of federal funding, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would require that the clients' rights advocate for the regional center be notified of each admission to an institution for mental disease, as specified. The bill would authorize, until July 1, 2014, the placement of consumers who are under 21 years of age for a period that exceeds 180 days if specified conditions are satisfied. (7) Existing law, until June 30, 2013, establishes a family program fee, as specified, for families with an adjusted gross family income, as defined, at or above 400% of the federal poverty level and who have a child meeting prescribed requirements, including receiving specified services from a regional center. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions indefinitely. (8) Existing law prohibits the commitment of a person with a developmental disability to the department unless the person is a danger to self or others and is being committed due to an acute crisis or because he or she is mentally incompetent to stand trial, or the person currently is a resident of a state developmental center or state-operated community facility pursuant to an order of commitment made prior to July 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would instead permit a person with a developmental disability to be committed to the department for residential placement other than in a state developmental center or state-operated community facility, as prescribed, if the person is found to be a danger to self or others, as specified. (9) Existing law provides for the closure of the Lanterman Developmental Center, including authorization for the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with any entity for the use of the department's employees to provide services in furtherance of the orderly closure of Lanterman Developmental Center, and specifies that the services of these employees may be used for up to 2 years following the transfer of the last resident of the Lanterman Developmental Center, as specified. This bill would require the department to complete closure of the Lanterman Developmental Center no later than December 31, 2014. The bill would also delete that 2-year limitation on the use of employees of the State Department of Developmental Services. (10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (11) The Budget Act of 2010 appropriates $300,370,000 for the support of the State Department of Developmental Services. This bill would extend the period to liquidate encumbrances of that appropriation to June 30, 2014, thereby making an appropriation. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 25, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 63. Noes 15. Page 2004.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 2001.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 2001.)

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 1364.).

  9. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1363.)

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. (Ayes 23. Noes 9. Page 1337.)

  12. Withdrawn from committee.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  14. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1396.)

  17. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1314.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)

  20. Ordered to second reading.

  21. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1312.)

  22. Withdrawn from committee.

  23. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33201
Democratic 3000
Total 36201
% of votes cast 92%5%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Evans — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Correa — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Knight — Yea
Roth — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 63 Yea · 15 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 571001
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 631501
% of votes cast 80%19%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
John A. Pérez — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Salas — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Campos — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Chau — Yea
Perea — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 24 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452003
Democratic 6001
Republican 0400
Total 512404
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Pan — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Stone — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Medina — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Ammiano — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 89 do?
(1) Existing law vests the State Department of Developmental Services with jurisdiction over state hospitals, referred to as developmental centers, for the provision of care to persons with developmental disabilities. Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires that treatment, services, and supports be provided in natural community settings to the maximum extent possible, and authorizes the department to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency to submit to the Legislature a master plan for the future of developmental centers by November 15, 2013. The bill would also require the agency to submit, by January 10, 2014, a report to the Legislature regarding, among other things, the ability of community resources to meet the specialized needs of residents now living in developmental centers. (2) Under existing law, every developmentally disabled person who is admitted or committed to a state hospital, developmental center, community care facility, health facility, or other placement has a right to a hearing by writ of habeas corpus for his or her release after a request for release is made to any employee of the center or facility. Existing law requires that at the time the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is filed with the court, the clerk of the court transmit a copy of the petition, together with notification as to the time and place of an evidentiary hearing in the matter, to the parent or conservator of the person seeking release or for whom release is sought and to the director of the appropriate regional center. This bill would require the clerk of the court to provide the above-described notice and petition to the clients' rights advocate of the appropriate regional center, and would authorize that advocate to attend these hearings to assist in protecting the individual's rights. By imposing this additional duty on court clerks, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Under existing law, the services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan, developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. This bill would authorize a regional center to pay any applicable copayment or coinsurance for a service and support required by a consumer's individual program plan if the service is paid for by the health care service plan or health insurance policy of the consumer or his or her parent, guardian, or caregiver and specified conditions are met. The bill would prohibit a regional center from paying health care service plan or health insurance policy deductibles. (4) Existing law requires the State Department of Developmental Services and the regional centers to annually collaborate to compile data relating to purchase of service authorization, utilization, and expenditure by each regional center, as specified. Under existing law, the department and each regional center is required to post this data on their respective Internet Web sites by December 31 of each year, and requires each regional center to hold a public meeting with stakeholders regarding the data within 3 months of its compilation. This bill would require each regional center to inform the department regarding the scheduling of those public meetings, and to post a notice of a meeting on its Internet Web site 30 days prior to the meeting. The bill would also require the department to post a notice of the meeting on its Internet Web site. The bill would further require the department and the regional centers to annually collaborate to determine the most appropriate methods to collect and compile data related to the payment of copayments and coinsurance by each regional center. (5) Existing law requires the State Department of Developmental Services to establish policies and procedures for the development of an annual community placement plan by regional centers. Existing law also requires the department to establish a statewide specialized resource service to reduce reliance on out-of-state placements and developmental centers and mental health facilities for which federal funding is not available. Existing law requires regional centers to complete a comprehensive assessment of specified consumers residing in developmental centers, and requires that this assessment be provided to the individual program planning team in order to assist the planning team in determining the least restrictive environment for the consumer. This bill would require the regional center to also provide, to the extent appropriate, relevant information from the statewide specialized resource service to the individual program planning team. The bill would also require that the clients' rights advocate for the regional center be notified of each individual program plan meeting that includes discussion of the results of the assessment, and would authorize the advocate to participate in the meeting unless the consumer objects on his or her own behalf. (6) Existing law prohibits a regional center from purchasing new residential services from institutions for mental disease for which federal Medicaid funding is not available, except in emergencies, as specified. Existing law limits these emergency placements to 180 days. This bill would additionally prohibit the placement of a consumer in an institution for mental disease regardless of the availability of federal funding, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would require that the clients' rights advocate for the regional center be notified of each admission to an institution for mental disease, as specified. The bill would authorize, until July 1, 2014, the placement of consumers who are under 21 years of age for a period that exceeds 180 days if specified conditions are satisfied. (7) Existing law, until June 30, 2013, establishes a family program fee, as specified, for families with an adjusted gross family income, as defined, at or above 400% of the federal poverty level and who have a child meeting prescribed requirements, including receiving specified services from a regional center. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions indefinitely. (8) Existing law prohibits the commitment of a person with a developmental disability to the department unless the person is a danger to self or others and is being committed due to an acute crisis or because he or she is mentally incompetent to stand trial, or the person currently is a resident of a state developmental center or state-operated community facility pursuant to an order of commitment made prior to July 1, 2012, as specified. This bill would instead permit a person with a developmental disability to be committed to the department for residential placement other than in a state developmental center or state-operated community facility, as prescribed, if the person is found to be a danger to self or others, as specified. (9) Existing law provides for the closure of the Lanterman Developmental Center, including authorization for the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with any entity for the use of the department's employees to provide services in furtherance of the orderly closure of Lanterman Developmental Center, and specifies that the services of these employees may be used for up to 2 years following the transfer of the last resident of the Lanterman Developmental Center, as specified. This bill would require the department to complete closure of the Lanterman Developmental Center no later than December 31, 2014. The bill would also delete that 2-year limitation on the use of employees of the State Department of Developmental Services. (10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (11) The Budget Act of 2010 appropriates $300,370,000 for the support of the State Department of Developmental Services. This bill would extend the period to liquidate encumbrances of that appropriation to June 30, 2014, thereby making an appropriation. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 89?
AB 89 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 89?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 89?
Track AB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 89

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 89

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →