California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly Bipartisan · 2 D · 1 R cosponsors

AB 1834 — Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act: employees.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the state and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. Under the act, an "employee" or "higher education employee" is defined as any employee of the Regents of the University of California, the Directors of the Hastings College of the Law, or the Trustees of the California State University. The act authorizes the board to find that student employees whose employment is contingent on their status as students are employees only if the services they provide are unrelated to their educational objectives, or that those educational objectives are subordinate to the services they perform and that coverage under this act would further the purposes of the act. This bill would instead provide that student employees whose employment is contingent upon their status as students are employees and higher education employees for purposes of the act. The act excludes from the "scope of representation," for purposes of the University of California only, among other things, conditions for the award of certificates and degrees to students. This bill would specify that the requirements for students to achieve satisfactory progress toward their degrees is also outside of the scope of representation.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  4. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  6. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 5293.)

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 23).

  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Read second time and amended.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 22).

  14. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  15. Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  16. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  17. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Williams

Co-sponsors (11)

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 53 Yea · 24 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 492102
Democratic 4000
Republican 0300
Total 532402
% of votes cast 67%30%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Williams — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Fox — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Fong — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Gorell — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Linder — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11400
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Campos — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Linder — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7401
Democratic 1000
Total 8401
% of votes cast 62%31%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Medina — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fong — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Fox — Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1834 do?
Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the state and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. Under the act, an "employee" or "higher education employee" is defined as any employee of the Regents of the University of California, the Directors of the Hastings College of the Law, or the Trustees of the California State University. The act authorizes the board to find that student employees whose employment is contingent on their status as students are employees only if the services they provide are unrelated to their educational objectives, or that those educational objectives are subordinate to the services they perform and that coverage under this act would further the purposes of the act. This bill would instead provide that student employees whose employment is contingent upon their status as students are employees and higher education employees for purposes of the act. The act excludes from the "scope of representation," for purposes of the University of California only, among other things, conditions for the award of certificates and degrees to students. This bill would specify that the requirements for students to achieve satisfactory progress toward their degrees is also outside of the scope of representation.
Who sponsors AB 1834?
AB 1834 is sponsored by Ammiano, Beall, Block, Hancock, Pan, Rendon, Skinner, Williams, Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic), Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican), Fong, Mike (Democratic), and Roger Hernández.
What is the current status of AB 1834?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1834?
Track AB 1834 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1834

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1834

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →