Narcotic treatment programs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 973 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 973.
You're tracking SB 973
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 973 — Narcotic treatment programs.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 484, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to administer prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse. Existing law requires the department to license the establishment of narcotic treatment programs in this state to use narcotic replacement therapy in the treatment of addicted persons whose addiction was acquired or supported by the use of a narcotic drug or drugs, not in compliance with a physician and surgeon's legal prescription. Existing law authorizes a program to admit a patient to narcotic maintenance or narcotic detoxification treatment 7 days after completion of a prior withdrawal treatment episode. This bill, instead, would authorize a program to admit a patient to narcotic maintenance or narcotic detoxification treatment at the discretion of the medical director and would require the program to assign a unique identifier to, and maintain an individual record of, each patient of the program. Existing law specifies the intent of the Legislature that self-administered dosage of the narcotic replacement only be provided when the patient is clearly adhering to the requirements of the program and where daily attendance at a clinic would be incompatible with gainful employment, education, and responsible homemaking. This bill, in addition, would authorize take-home doses to be provided to patients who are clearly adhering to the requirements of the program if daily attendance at a clinic would be incompatible with retirement or medical disability or if the program is closed on Sundays or holidays and providing a take-home dose is not contrary to federal laws and regulations. The bill would require a narcotic treatment program medical director to determine whether or not to dilute take-home doses. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/19/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 19, 2014
- Enrolled 08/20/14 - Enrolled pdf August 20, 2014
- Amended 08/14/14 - Amended Assembly pdf August 14, 2014
- Amended 06/02/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 02, 2014
- Amended 04/29/14 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Senate pdf March 28, 2014
- Amended 03/26/14 - Amended Senate pdf March 26, 2014
- Introduced 02/10/14 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2014
- SB973 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 484, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4604.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6123.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Page 6029.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (July 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3468.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3441.) (May 12).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3279.) (April 24).
-
April 23 hearing rescheduled for April 24.
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 973 do?
- Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to administer prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse. Existing law requires the department to license the establishment of narcotic treatment programs in this state to use narcotic replacement therapy in the treatment of addicted persons whose addiction was acquired or supported by the use of a narcotic drug or drugs, not in compliance with a physician and surgeon's legal prescription. Existing law authorizes a program to admit a patient to narcotic maintenance or narcotic detoxification treatment 7 days after completion of a prior withdrawal treatment episode. This bill, instead, would authorize a program to admit a patient to narcotic maintenance or narcotic detoxification treatment at the discretion of the medical director and would require the program to assign a unique identifier to, and maintain an individual record of, each patient of the program. Existing law specifies the intent of the Legislature that self-administered dosage of the narcotic replacement only be provided when the patient is clearly adhering to the requirements of the program and where daily attendance at a clinic would be incompatible with gainful employment, education, and responsible homemaking. This bill, in addition, would authorize take-home doses to be provided to patients who are clearly adhering to the requirements of the program if daily attendance at a clinic would be incompatible with retirement or medical disability or if the program is closed on Sundays or holidays and providing a take-home dose is not contrary to federal laws and regulations. The bill would require a narcotic treatment program medical director to determine whether or not to dilute take-home doses. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 973?
- SB 973 is sponsored by Hernandez.
- What is the current status of SB 973?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 973?
- Track SB 973 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 973
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 973
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →