California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 76 — Public safety.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 32, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes in the State Treasury the Local Revenue Fund 2011, a continuously appropriated fund, and requires that its funds be allocated exclusively for public safety services, as defined. Existing law further establishes the Law Enforcement Services Account within that fund, and creates the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount and the Juvenile Justice Subaccount within the Law Enforcement Services Account. Existing law, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, allocates specified funds from the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount to local governments, including to cities and counties that charge fees to a city, special district, community college district, college, or university for the booking or detention of a person arrested and brought to a detention facility of the city or county, as specified. Existing law also allocates certain percentages of the moneys deposited in the subaccount as follows: 3.78% to county sheriffs' departments to enhance law enforcement efforts in specified counties; 8.35% for use by the California Multi-Jurisdictional Methamphetamine Enforcement Teams, Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium, Sexual Assault Felony Enforcement Teams, High Technology Theft Apprehension and Prosecution Program, Gang Violence Suppression Program, and the Central Valley and Central Coast Rural Crime Prevention Programs, as specified; 30.99% to specified counties to serve children who are habitual truants, runaways, at risk of being wards of the court, or under juvenile court supervision or supervision of the probation department, as prescribed; and 6.01% to counties that operate juvenile camps and ranches, based on the number of beds in each camp. Existing law requires each county to establish in the county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account for the receipt of all amounts allocated to a county for specified local law enforcement purposes, including jail construction and operation, criminal prosecution, and juvenile justice plans. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate funds to local jurisdictions for these purposes as annually calculated by the Director of Finance. Existing law establishes the Youthful Offender Block Grant Special Account in the Juvenile Justice Subaccount, and requires that allocations from that account be used to enhance the capacity of county departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision services to youthful offenders. Existing law requires that these funds be allocated in 4 equal installments, to be paid in September, December, March, and June, pursuant to a specified formula. Existing law establishes the Juvenile Reentry Grant Special Account in the Juvenile Justice Subaccount and requires that its funds be allocated for the purpose of providing for the local supervision of persons discharged from the custody of the Division of Juvenile Facilities. Existing law requires that the amount allocated to each county probation department from that account be distributed in 2 equal payments to be paid on October 30 and May 30 of each fiscal year pursuant to specified criteria. This bill would require the Controller to allocate funds from the above-described accounts for those same purposes and in the same amounts, but would require that the allocations be made in monthly installments. (2) Existing law establishes the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount within the Local Revenue Fund 2011 in the State Treasury. Existing law requires the Controller, in the 2012–13 fiscal year, to allocate funds from the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to specified accounts relating to criminal justice. This bill would instead require the Controller to make those allocations commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year. (3) The California Constitution allows the Legislature, by statute, to authorize cities and counties to provide for bingo games for charitable purposes. Existing law authorizes cities and counties to permit eligible nonprofit organizations to conduct bingo games and remote caller bingo games, as defined, for charitable purposes pursuant to an ordinance that allows those games to be conducted in accordance with specified requirements. Existing law requires the California Gambling Control Commission to regulate remote caller bingo, including licensure and operation. Existing law requires any person who conducts a remote caller bingo game to be licensed. Existing law requires the commission to approve all equipment used for remote caller bingo in advance, to monitor operation of the transmission and other equipment used for remote caller bingo, and to monitor the game. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to conduct background investigations and conduct field enforcement as it relates to remote caller bingo consistent with existing law and as specified in regulations promulgated by the commission. Existing law and the Governor's Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012 (GRP 2) , effective on July 3, 2012, and operative on July 1, 2013, consolidates the support, investigatory, auditing, and compliance functions of the California Gambling Control Commission and transfers these duties to the Department of Justice. The commission retains jurisdiction over the licensing, policies, regulations, criteria, and standards pertaining to gaming. This bill would additionally require the licensure of any person who contracts to conduct remote caller bingo on behalf of an authorized organization or who is identified as having fiduciary responsibility of the game. The bill would establish an annual licensing fee in an amount determined by the department, not to exceed the reasonable regulatory costs to the department and in accordance with regulations adopted by the department. The bill would require that prior to the adoption of regulations, the nonrefundable license fee would be the amount of the reasonable regulatory costs to the department not to exceed $3,000, for any person or entity that directly or indirectly manufactures, distributes, supplies, vends, leases, or otherwise provides supplies, devices, services, or other equipment designed for use in the playing of a remote caller bingo game by any nonprofit organization. The bill would require the department to conduct any background investigation related to remote caller bingo in accordance with existing law and as specified in regulations promulgated by the commission or the department. This bill would reallocate additional functions among the commission and the department with regard to remote caller bingo. The bill would require a remote caller bingo site, for each participating remote caller bingo site, to notify the department and local law enforcement of its intent to conduct a game, rather than the commission. The bill would require all equipment used for remote caller bingo to be certified as compliant with specified regulations by a manufacturing expert recognized by the department. The bill would require equipment certifications to be submitted to the department prior to the equipment's use. The bill would also authorize the department, rather than the commission, to monitor the operation of the transmission and other equipment used for remote caller bingo, and to monitor the game. The bill would transfer the auditing functions of the commission to the department, as those functions relate to remote caller bingo. The bill would also make various technical, nonsubstantive conforming changes to further reflect GRP 2. Existing law authorizes certain loans from the Gambling Control Fund to the California Bingo Fund to fund operating, personnel, and other startup costs incurred by the commission related to remote caller bingo. Existing law requires these loans to be repaid no later than 5 years after the date of the loan. Existing law requires that funds from the California Bingo Fund be available to the commission upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. Existing law also authorizes the commission to assess and collect reasonable fees and deposits as necessary to defray the costs of regulation and oversight. This bill would require the previously described loans to the California Bingo Fund to be repaid by July 1, 2019. The bill would require funds from the California Bingo Fund be available to both the commission and the department upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. The bill would additionally authorize the department to assess and collect reasonable fees and deposits to defray the costs of regulation and oversight. This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2016, and would repeal the remote caller bingo program as of January 1, 2017. (4) Existing law defines a felony as a crime that is punishable by death, imprisonment in the state prison, or imprisonment in a county jail for a term greater than one year, as specified. Existing law also provides exceptions to imprisonment in a county jail for a variety of felonies, including serious or violent felonies and any felony for which registration as a sex offender is required, among other exceptions. Existing law provides that, when a court commits a person to county jail for a felony, the portion of a defendant's sentenced term during which time he or she is supervised by the county probation officer is known as mandatory supervision. This bill would specify that mandatory supervision begins upon release from custody. By increasing the duties of county probation officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law generally requires that all persons released from prison on and after October 1, 2011, after serving a prison term for a felony, be subject to postrelease community supervision provided by a county agency for a period of 3 years immediately following release, except for persons released after serving a term for a serious felony, a violent felony, an offense for which the person was sentenced pursuant to the "Three Strikes" law, a crime where the person is classified as a high-risk sex offender, or a crime where the person is required to undergo treatment by the State Department of State Hospitals because the person has a severe mental disorder. Existing law requires these persons to be subject to parole supervision by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation following release from state prison and the jurisdiction of the court in the county in which the parolee is released or resides for the purpose of hearing petitions to revoke parole and impose a term of custody. This bill would require persons subject to parole supervision to additionally be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in the county in which the alleged violation of supervision occurred for the purpose of hearing petitions to revoke parole and impose a term of custody. The bill would make conforming changes. This bill would also require a person released to parole to remain on parole after having served 60 days on parole, regardless of a subsequent determination that the person should have been released to postrelease community supervision. The bill would likewise require a person released to postrelease community supervision to remain on postrelease community supervision after having served 60 days on postrelease community supervision, regardless of a subsequent determination that the person should have been released to parole. By requiring county agencies to supervise persons on postrelease community supervision who should have been released to parole, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) Existing law provides for postrelease community supervision by county officials for persons convicted of certain specified felonies upon release from the state prison or a county jail. Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to release prescribed information to local law enforcement agencies regarding a paroled inmate or inmate placed on postrelease supervision, including the inmate's name, contact information, description, and the offense or offenses for which the inmate was incarcerated. This bill would require the department to electronically transmit to the county agency responsible for postrelease community supervision the inmate's tuberculosis status, specific medical, mental health, and outpatient clinic needs, and any medical concerns or disabilities for the purpose of identifying the medical and mental health needs of the individual. The bill would require the information to be transferred in conformity with specified federal laws, including the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) . Operation of the bill would be conditional on the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or his or her designee, determining that this provision is not preempted by HIPAA. (7) Under existing law, when a prisoner is confined to county jail, an industrial farm, or a road camp, for each 4-day period in which he or she is confined, he or she may have one day or 2 days deducted from his or her period of confinement, as specified. Existing law allows any inmate sentenced to a county jail assigned to a conservation camp by a sheriff and who is eligible to earn one day of credit for every one day of incarceration to earn 2 days of credit for every one day of service. Existing law allows any inmate who has completed training for assignment to a conservation camp or to a state or county facility as an inmate firefighter or who is assigned to a county or state correctional institution as an inmate firefighter and who is eligible to earn one day of credit for every one day of incarceration to instead earn 2 days of credit for every one day served in that assignment or after completing that training. This bill would instead allow the sheriff or county director of corrections to award one and a half days credit for every day of incarceration to any inmate sentenced to the county jail who participates in an in custody work or job training program other than those specified above. (8) Existing law establishes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, which has jurisdiction over state prisons and parole of offenders released from state prisons. This bill would require, except in prescribed emergencies, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or his or her designee, to provide written notification to any county impacted by the opening, closure, or change of location of any reception center that accepts prisoners from county facilities or a parole office and would require this notice to be sent to the California State Association of Counties, the California State Sheriffs' Association, and the Chief Probation Officers of California. (9) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (10) The bill would appropriate $2,000 from the California Bingo Fund to the Gambling Control Commission for the purpose of supporting workload associated with the licensing of remote caller bingo vendors, as provided. (11) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 32, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 1374.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 1987.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Amendments by Assembly Member Patterson tabled on motion by Assembly Member Atkins. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 1986.)

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 1983.)

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 892.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. Ordered to second reading.

  17. Withdrawn from committee.

  18. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  19. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  20. (Corrected May 9).

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 54 Yea · 25 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482000
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 542500
% of votes cast 68%32%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Medina — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Perea — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Chau — Yea
Linder — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 54 Yea · 25 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482000
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 542500
% of votes cast 68%32%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Stone — Yea
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Holden — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 30 Yea · 8 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27801
Democratic 3000
Total 30801
% of votes cast 77%21%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Wright — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Knight — Nay
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 9 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22904
Democratic 2001
Total 24905
% of votes cast 63%24%0%13%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Huff — Nay
Lieu — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 76 do?
(1) Existing law establishes in the State Treasury the Local Revenue Fund 2011, a continuously appropriated fund, and requires that its funds be allocated exclusively for public safety services, as defined. Existing law further establishes the Law Enforcement Services Account within that fund, and creates the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount and the Juvenile Justice Subaccount within the Law Enforcement Services Account. Existing law, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, allocates specified funds from the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount to local governments, including to cities and counties that charge fees to a city, special district, community college district, college, or university for the booking or detention of a person arrested and brought to a detention facility of the city or county, as specified. Existing law also allocates certain percentages of the moneys deposited in the subaccount as follows: 3.78% to county sheriffs' departments to enhance law enforcement efforts in specified counties; 8.35% for use by the California Multi-Jurisdictional Methamphetamine Enforcement Teams, Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium, Sexual Assault Felony Enforcement Teams, High Technology Theft Apprehension and Prosecution Program, Gang Violence Suppression Program, and the Central Valley and Central Coast Rural Crime Prevention Programs, as specified; 30.99% to specified counties to serve children who are habitual truants, runaways, at risk of being wards of the court, or under juvenile court supervision or supervision of the probation department, as prescribed; and 6.01% to counties that operate juvenile camps and ranches, based on the number of beds in each camp. Existing law requires each county to establish in the county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account for the receipt of all amounts allocated to a county for specified local law enforcement purposes, including jail construction and operation, criminal prosecution, and juvenile justice plans. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate funds to local jurisdictions for these purposes as annually calculated by the Director of Finance. Existing law establishes the Youthful Offender Block Grant Special Account in the Juvenile Justice Subaccount, and requires that allocations from that account be used to enhance the capacity of county departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision services to youthful offenders. Existing law requires that these funds be allocated in 4 equal installments, to be paid in September, December, March, and June, pursuant to a specified formula. Existing law establishes the Juvenile Reentry Grant Special Account in the Juvenile Justice Subaccount and requires that its funds be allocated for the purpose of providing for the local supervision of persons discharged from the custody of the Division of Juvenile Facilities. Existing law requires that the amount allocated to each county probation department from that account be distributed in 2 equal payments to be paid on October 30 and May 30 of each fiscal year pursuant to specified criteria. This bill would require the Controller to allocate funds from the above-described accounts for those same purposes and in the same amounts, but would require that the allocations be made in monthly installments. (2) Existing law establishes the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount within the Local Revenue Fund 2011 in the State Treasury. Existing law requires the Controller, in the 2012–13 fiscal year, to allocate funds from the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to specified accounts relating to criminal justice. This bill would instead require the Controller to make those allocations commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year. (3) The California Constitution allows the Legislature, by statute, to authorize cities and counties to provide for bingo games for charitable purposes. Existing law authorizes cities and counties to permit eligible nonprofit organizations to conduct bingo games and remote caller bingo games, as defined, for charitable purposes pursuant to an ordinance that allows those games to be conducted in accordance with specified requirements. Existing law requires the California Gambling Control Commission to regulate remote caller bingo, including licensure and operation. Existing law requires any person who conducts a remote caller bingo game to be licensed. Existing law requires the commission to approve all equipment used for remote caller bingo in advance, to monitor operation of the transmission and other equipment used for remote caller bingo, and to monitor the game. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to conduct background investigations and conduct field enforcement as it relates to remote caller bingo consistent with existing law and as specified in regulations promulgated by the commission. Existing law and the Governor's Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012 (GRP 2) , effective on July 3, 2012, and operative on July 1, 2013, consolidates the support, investigatory, auditing, and compliance functions of the California Gambling Control Commission and transfers these duties to the Department of Justice. The commission retains jurisdiction over the licensing, policies, regulations, criteria, and standards pertaining to gaming. This bill would additionally require the licensure of any person who contracts to conduct remote caller bingo on behalf of an authorized organization or who is identified as having fiduciary responsibility of the game. The bill would establish an annual licensing fee in an amount determined by the department, not to exceed the reasonable regulatory costs to the department and in accordance with regulations adopted by the department. The bill would require that prior to the adoption of regulations, the nonrefundable license fee would be the amount of the reasonable regulatory costs to the department not to exceed $3,000, for any person or entity that directly or indirectly manufactures, distributes, supplies, vends, leases, or otherwise provides supplies, devices, services, or other equipment designed for use in the playing of a remote caller bingo game by any nonprofit organization. The bill would require the department to conduct any background investigation related to remote caller bingo in accordance with existing law and as specified in regulations promulgated by the commission or the department. This bill would reallocate additional functions among the commission and the department with regard to remote caller bingo. The bill would require a remote caller bingo site, for each participating remote caller bingo site, to notify the department and local law enforcement of its intent to conduct a game, rather than the commission. The bill would require all equipment used for remote caller bingo to be certified as compliant with specified regulations by a manufacturing expert recognized by the department. The bill would require equipment certifications to be submitted to the department prior to the equipment's use. The bill would also authorize the department, rather than the commission, to monitor the operation of the transmission and other equipment used for remote caller bingo, and to monitor the game. The bill would transfer the auditing functions of the commission to the department, as those functions relate to remote caller bingo. The bill would also make various technical, nonsubstantive conforming changes to further reflect GRP 2. Existing law authorizes certain loans from the Gambling Control Fund to the California Bingo Fund to fund operating, personnel, and other startup costs incurred by the commission related to remote caller bingo. Existing law requires these loans to be repaid no later than 5 years after the date of the loan. Existing law requires that funds from the California Bingo Fund be available to the commission upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. Existing law also authorizes the commission to assess and collect reasonable fees and deposits as necessary to defray the costs of regulation and oversight. This bill would require the previously described loans to the California Bingo Fund to be repaid by July 1, 2019. The bill would require funds from the California Bingo Fund be available to both the commission and the department upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. The bill would additionally authorize the department to assess and collect reasonable fees and deposits to defray the costs of regulation and oversight. This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2016, and would repeal the remote caller bingo program as of January 1, 2017. (4) Existing law defines a felony as a crime that is punishable by death, imprisonment in the state prison, or imprisonment in a county jail for a term greater than one year, as specified. Existing law also provides exceptions to imprisonment in a county jail for a variety of felonies, including serious or violent felonies and any felony for which registration as a sex offender is required, among other exceptions. Existing law provides that, when a court commits a person to county jail for a felony, the portion of a defendant's sentenced term during which time he or she is supervised by the county probation officer is known as mandatory supervision. This bill would specify that mandatory supervision begins upon release from custody. By increasing the duties of county probation officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law generally requires that all persons released from prison on and after October 1, 2011, after serving a prison term for a felony, be subject to postrelease community supervision provided by a county agency for a period of 3 years immediately following release, except for persons released after serving a term for a serious felony, a violent felony, an offense for which the person was sentenced pursuant to the "Three Strikes" law, a crime where the person is classified as a high-risk sex offender, or a crime where the person is required to undergo treatment by the State Department of State Hospitals because the person has a severe mental disorder. Existing law requires these persons to be subject to parole supervision by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation following release from state prison and the jurisdiction of the court in the county in which the parolee is released or resides for the purpose of hearing petitions to revoke parole and impose a term of custody. This bill would require persons subject to parole supervision to additionally be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in the county in which the alleged violation of supervision occurred for the purpose of hearing petitions to revoke parole and impose a term of custody. The bill would make conforming changes. This bill would also require a person released to parole to remain on parole after having served 60 days on parole, regardless of a subsequent determination that the person should have been released to postrelease community supervision. The bill would likewise require a person released to postrelease community supervision to remain on postrelease community supervision after having served 60 days on postrelease community supervision, regardless of a subsequent determination that the person should have been released to parole. By requiring county agencies to supervise persons on postrelease community supervision who should have been released to parole, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) Existing law provides for postrelease community supervision by county officials for persons convicted of certain specified felonies upon release from the state prison or a county jail. Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to release prescribed information to local law enforcement agencies regarding a paroled inmate or inmate placed on postrelease supervision, including the inmate's name, contact information, description, and the offense or offenses for which the inmate was incarcerated. This bill would require the department to electronically transmit to the county agency responsible for postrelease community supervision the inmate's tuberculosis status, specific medical, mental health, and outpatient clinic needs, and any medical concerns or disabilities for the purpose of identifying the medical and mental health needs of the individual. The bill would require the information to be transferred in conformity with specified federal laws, including the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) . Operation of the bill would be conditional on the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or his or her designee, determining that this provision is not preempted by HIPAA. (7) Under existing law, when a prisoner is confined to county jail, an industrial farm, or a road camp, for each 4-day period in which he or she is confined, he or she may have one day or 2 days deducted from his or her period of confinement, as specified. Existing law allows any inmate sentenced to a county jail assigned to a conservation camp by a sheriff and who is eligible to earn one day of credit for every one day of incarceration to earn 2 days of credit for every one day of service. Existing law allows any inmate who has completed training for assignment to a conservation camp or to a state or county facility as an inmate firefighter or who is assigned to a county or state correctional institution as an inmate firefighter and who is eligible to earn one day of credit for every one day of incarceration to instead earn 2 days of credit for every one day served in that assignment or after completing that training. This bill would instead allow the sheriff or county director of corrections to award one and a half days credit for every day of incarceration to any inmate sentenced to the county jail who participates in an in custody work or job training program other than those specified above. (8) Existing law establishes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, which has jurisdiction over state prisons and parole of offenders released from state prisons. This bill would require, except in prescribed emergencies, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or his or her designee, to provide written notification to any county impacted by the opening, closure, or change of location of any reception center that accepts prisoners from county facilities or a parole office and would require this notice to be sent to the California State Association of Counties, the California State Sheriffs' Association, and the Chief Probation Officers of California. (9) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (10) The bill would appropriate $2,000 from the California Bingo Fund to the Gambling Control Commission for the purpose of supporting workload associated with the licensing of remote caller bingo vendors, as provided. (11) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 76?
SB 76 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 76?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 76?
Track SB 76 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 76

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 76

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →