School district reorganization: base revenue limit: Wiseburn Unified School District.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 41 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 41.
You're tracking SB 41
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 41 — School district reorganization: base revenue limit: Wiseburn Unified School District.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 11, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires plans and recommendations for the reorganization of school districts to include a computation of the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance that is based, in part, on the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the affected school districts. Existing law requires the blended revenue limit to be computed by multiplying the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for each affected district for the fiscal year 2 years before the fiscal year in which the reorganization is to be effective by the number of units of average daily attendance for the affected school district that the county superintendent of schools determines will be included in the proposed school district. For the Wiseburn Unified School District, existing law instead requires the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the district to be calculated in a manner that is based, in part, on the revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the 2012–13 fiscal year of the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District. This bill would repeal the provision requiring a special calculation of the blended revenue limit for the Wiseburn Unified School District. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 04/22/13 - Chaptered Current pdf April 22, 2013
- Enrolled 04/04/13 - Enrolled pdf April 04, 2013
- Introduced 12/11/12 - Introduced pdf December 11, 2012
- SB41 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 20).
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 250.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 224.) (February 27).
-
Set for hearing February 27.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 11.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 71 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 41 do?
- Existing law requires plans and recommendations for the reorganization of school districts to include a computation of the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance that is based, in part, on the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the affected school districts. Existing law requires the blended revenue limit to be computed by multiplying the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for each affected district for the fiscal year 2 years before the fiscal year in which the reorganization is to be effective by the number of units of average daily attendance for the affected school district that the county superintendent of schools determines will be included in the proposed school district. For the Wiseburn Unified School District, existing law instead requires the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the district to be calculated in a manner that is based, in part, on the revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the 2012–13 fiscal year of the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District. This bill would repeal the provision requiring a special calculation of the blended revenue limit for the Wiseburn Unified School District. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 41?
- SB 41 is sponsored by Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 41?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 11, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 41?
- Track SB 41 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 41
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 41
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →