California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 151 — State highway operation and protection program.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law generally provides for the programming and allocation of state and federal transportation capital improvement funds pursuant to the state transportation improvement program process administered by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law additionally requires the Department of Transportation to prepare a state highway operation and protection program for the expenditure of funds for major capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system but that do not add a new traffic lane to the system. The state highway operation and protection program is based on a 10-year rehabilitation plan and a 5-year maintenance plan prepared by the department. Existing law provides for the program to be submitted to the commission for approval in every even-numbered year. Existing law authorizes the commission to review the program relative to its overall adequacy, level of annual funding needed to implement the program, and impact of those expenditures on the state transportation improvement program, but does not provide for the commission to allocate funds to specific projects in the state highway operation and protection program. This bill would require the commission to allocate funding for all capital and support costs for a project in the state highway operation and protection program. For a project that experiences increases in capital or support costs above the amount originally allocated, the bill would require the department to submit a supplemental project allocation request for approval by the commission. The bill would authorize the commission to establish guidelines to provide exceptions to the requirements relating to these supplemental project allocation requests that it determines may be necessary to ensure projects are not unnecessarily delayed.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Held under submission.

  4. Set, second hearing.

  5. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 23).

  9. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  10. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 903.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  15. Set for hearing April 29.

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 568.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. Set for hearing April 16.

  18. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  19. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 3.

  20. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cannella · Cosponsor
  • DeSaulnier · Primary
  • Hancock · Cosponsor
  • Lara · Cosponsor
  • Pavley · Cosponsor
  • Steinberg · Cosponsor
  • Roth · Cosponsor
  • Bonnie Lowenthal · Cosponsor
  • Beth Gaines · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (113)

113 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 113 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11003
Democratic 2000
Total 13003
% of votes cast 81%0%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Yea
Nazarian — Not Voting
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Daly — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Waldron — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32003
Democratic 2001
Total 34004
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Wyland — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 151 do?
Existing law generally provides for the programming and allocation of state and federal transportation capital improvement funds pursuant to the state transportation improvement program process administered by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law additionally requires the Department of Transportation to prepare a state highway operation and protection program for the expenditure of funds for major capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system but that do not add a new traffic lane to the system. The state highway operation and protection program is based on a 10-year rehabilitation plan and a 5-year maintenance plan prepared by the department. Existing law provides for the program to be submitted to the commission for approval in every even-numbered year. Existing law authorizes the commission to review the program relative to its overall adequacy, level of annual funding needed to implement the program, and impact of those expenditures on the state transportation improvement program, but does not provide for the commission to allocate funds to specific projects in the state highway operation and protection program. This bill would require the commission to allocate funding for all capital and support costs for a project in the state highway operation and protection program. For a project that experiences increases in capital or support costs above the amount originally allocated, the bill would require the department to submit a supplemental project allocation request for approval by the commission. The bill would authorize the commission to establish guidelines to provide exceptions to the requirements relating to these supplemental project allocation requests that it determines may be necessary to ensure projects are not unnecessarily delayed.
Who sponsors SB 151?
SB 151 is sponsored by Cannella, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Lara, Pavley, Steinberg, Roth, Bonnie Lowenthal, and Beth Gaines.
What is the current status of SB 151?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 151?
Track SB 151 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 151

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 151

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →