Land use: subdivision maps: expiration dates.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 116 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 116.
You're tracking AB 116
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 116 — Land use: subdivision maps: expiration dates.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 62, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
1 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency, and sets forth procedures governing the local agency's processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification thereof. The act generally requires a subdivider to file a tentative map or vesting tentative map with the local agency, as specified, and the local agency, in turn, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the map within a specified time period. The act requires an approved tentative map or vesting tentative map to expire 24 months after its approval, or after an additional period of time prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed 12 months. However, the act extends the expiration date of certain approved tentative maps and vesting tentative maps, as specified. This bill would extend by 24 months the expiration date of any approved tentative map or vesting tentative map that was approved on or after January 1, 2000. The bill would additionally require the extension of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map or vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map was approved on or before December 31, 1999, upon application by the subdivider at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the map, as specified. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The Permit Streamlining Act prohibits a local agency, after its approval of a tentative map for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family residential units, from requiring conformance with, or the performance of, any conditions that the local agency could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map, as a condition to the issuance of any building permit or equivalent permit upon approval of that subdivision, during a 5-year period following the recordation of the final map or parcel map for that subdivision. The act also prohibits a local agency from refusing to issue a building permit or equivalent permit for a subdivider's failure to conform with or perform those conditions. However, the act also provides that this 5-year period is a 3-year period for a tentative map extended pursuant to a specified provision of law, and the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. This bill would provide that a tentative map extended pursuant to its provisions is also subject to the truncated 3-year period described above, and that the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, as specified, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/11/13 - Chaptered Current pdf July 11, 2013
- Enrolled 07/02/13 - Enrolled pdf July 02, 2013
- Amended 05/16/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 16, 2013
- Amended 03/20/13 - Amended Assembly pdf March 20, 2013
- Introduced 01/14/13 - Introduced pdf January 14, 2013
- AB116 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 62, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:20 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1600.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1509.).
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1453.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 1).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Achadjian · Cosponsor
- Bocanegra · Primary
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- Bonilla · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Frazier · Cosponsor
- Hagman · Cosponsor
- Hueso · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Maienschein · Cosponsor
- Olsen · Cosponsor
- Padilla · Cosponsor
- Rendon · Cosponsor
- Torres · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bocanegra
Co-sponsors (14)
- Achadjian
- Atkins
- Bonilla
- Correa
- Eggman
- Frazier
- Hagman
- Hueso
- Lieu
- Maienschein
- Olsen
- Padilla
- Rendon
- Torres
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 116 do?
- (1) The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency, and sets forth procedures governing the local agency's processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification thereof. The act generally requires a subdivider to file a tentative map or vesting tentative map with the local agency, as specified, and the local agency, in turn, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the map within a specified time period. The act requires an approved tentative map or vesting tentative map to expire 24 months after its approval, or after an additional period of time prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed 12 months. However, the act extends the expiration date of certain approved tentative maps and vesting tentative maps, as specified. This bill would extend by 24 months the expiration date of any approved tentative map or vesting tentative map that was approved on or after January 1, 2000. The bill would additionally require the extension of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map or vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map was approved on or before December 31, 1999, upon application by the subdivider at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the map, as specified. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The Permit Streamlining Act prohibits a local agency, after its approval of a tentative map for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family residential units, from requiring conformance with, or the performance of, any conditions that the local agency could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map, as a condition to the issuance of any building permit or equivalent permit upon approval of that subdivision, during a 5-year period following the recordation of the final map or parcel map for that subdivision. The act also prohibits a local agency from refusing to issue a building permit or equivalent permit for a subdivider's failure to conform with or perform those conditions. However, the act also provides that this 5-year period is a 3-year period for a tentative map extended pursuant to a specified provision of law, and the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. This bill would provide that a tentative map extended pursuant to its provisions is also subject to the truncated 3-year period described above, and that the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, as specified, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 116?
- AB 116 is sponsored by Achadjian, Bocanegra, Atkins, Bonilla, Correa, Eggman, Frazier, Hagman, Hueso, Lieu, Maienschein, Olsen, Padilla, Rendon, and Torres.
- What is the current status of AB 116?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 116?
- Track AB 116 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 116
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 116
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →