Local transportation funds: Ventura County.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 203 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 203.
You're tracking SB 203
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 203 — Local transportation funds: Ventura County.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 464, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires that 14% of the local sales and use tax be transferred to the local transportation fund of each county for allocation, as directed by the transportation planning agency, for various transportation purposes. Existing law specifies the allowable uses for local transportation funds, and generally requires these funds to be used for transit purposes in urban counties, while in counties with a population under 500,000 as of the 1970 census and certain other counties, these funds may also be used for local streets and roads, if the transportation planning agency finds that there are no unmet transit needs or no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet, and for other specified purposes. Existing law, beginning July 1, 2014, for counties with a population of less than 500,000 as of the 1970 decennial census, but that have a population of 500,000 or more as of the 2000 decennial census or at a subsequent census, requires the local transportation funds apportioned to the urbanized areas of those counties to generally be allocated for public transit purposes and not for street and road purposes, except that cities in those counties with a population of 100,000 or fewer are exempt from this requirement. Under existing law, local transportation funds apportioned to the nonurbanized areas in those counties remain available for allocation to street and road purposes and for other specified purposes. Existing law exempts Ventura County from these provisions and instead authorized the Ventura County Transportation Commission to submit, by December 31, 2011, a report to the Legislature analyzing options for organizing public mass transportation services in the county and for expenditure of revenues in the local transportation fund, along with a recommended legislative proposal. Under existing law, if a legislative proposal was not enacted by the end of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature, local transportation funds in Ventura County would be required to be available solely for transit purposes beginning July 1, 2014. This bill would repeal the provisions specifically relating to Ventura County and the expenditure of local transportation funds there. This bill would also require the Ventura County Transportation Commission to post on its Internet Web site an annual report for 5 years, beginning September 1, 2014, on transit service within the county, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/01/13 - Chaptered Current pdf October 01, 2013
- Enrolled 09/03/13 - Enrolled pdf September 03, 2013
- Amended 07/03/13 - Amended Assembly pdf July 03, 2013
- Amended 05/14/13 - Amended Senate pdf May 14, 2013
- Amended 04/30/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 30, 2013
- Introduced 02/07/13 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2013
- SB203 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 464, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2042.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2672.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 14).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 1).
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 971.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 667.) (April 23).
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 203 do?
- Existing law requires that 14% of the local sales and use tax be transferred to the local transportation fund of each county for allocation, as directed by the transportation planning agency, for various transportation purposes. Existing law specifies the allowable uses for local transportation funds, and generally requires these funds to be used for transit purposes in urban counties, while in counties with a population under 500,000 as of the 1970 census and certain other counties, these funds may also be used for local streets and roads, if the transportation planning agency finds that there are no unmet transit needs or no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet, and for other specified purposes. Existing law, beginning July 1, 2014, for counties with a population of less than 500,000 as of the 1970 decennial census, but that have a population of 500,000 or more as of the 2000 decennial census or at a subsequent census, requires the local transportation funds apportioned to the urbanized areas of those counties to generally be allocated for public transit purposes and not for street and road purposes, except that cities in those counties with a population of 100,000 or fewer are exempt from this requirement. Under existing law, local transportation funds apportioned to the nonurbanized areas in those counties remain available for allocation to street and road purposes and for other specified purposes. Existing law exempts Ventura County from these provisions and instead authorized the Ventura County Transportation Commission to submit, by December 31, 2011, a report to the Legislature analyzing options for organizing public mass transportation services in the county and for expenditure of revenues in the local transportation fund, along with a recommended legislative proposal. Under existing law, if a legislative proposal was not enacted by the end of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature, local transportation funds in Ventura County would be required to be available solely for transit purposes beginning July 1, 2014. This bill would repeal the provisions specifically relating to Ventura County and the expenditure of local transportation funds there. This bill would also require the Ventura County Transportation Commission to post on its Internet Web site an annual report for 5 years, beginning September 1, 2014, on transit service within the county, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 203?
- SB 203 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 203?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 203?
- Track SB 203 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 203
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 203
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →