Political Reform Act of 1974
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 800 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 800.
You're tracking AB 800
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 800 — Political Reform Act of 1974
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 9, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
8 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Political Reform Act of 1974 prohibits an agent or independent contractor from making an expenditure of $500 or more, other than overhead or normal operating expenses, on behalf of or for the benefit of any candidate or committee unless it is reported by the candidate or committee as if the expenditure were made directly by the candidate or committee. The act requires an agent or independent contractor to make known to the candidate or committee all information subject to this reporting requirement. This bill, in addition, would require a subagent or subcontractor who provides goods or services to or for the benefit of a candidate or committee to make known to the agent or independent contractor all of the information subject to the reporting requirement described above, and would require that disclosure of this information by a subagent or subcontractor to the agent or independent contractor or by the agent or independent contractor to the candidate or committee occur no later than three working days prior to the time the campaign statement reporting the expenditure is required to be filed, except that an expenditure that is required to be reported as a late contribution or late independent expenditure must be reported to the candidate or committee within 24 hours of the time that it is made. (2) The act defines as "surplus campaign funds" campaign funds that are under the control of a former candidate or former elected officer as of the date of leaving elective office or the end of the postelection reporting period following the defeat of the candidate for elective office, whichever occurs last. The act restricts the purposes for which surplus campaign funds may be expended. This bill would increase the time at which campaign funds become surplus campaign funds by 90 days following either the officer leaving elective office or the end of the postelection reporting period following the defeat of a candidate, whichever occurs last. (3) The act requires the Franchise Tax Board to conduct audits and field investigations of various financial statements required to be submitted by lobbying firms, lobbyist employers, candidates, and specified committees. The act prohibits the commencement of an audit or investigation of a candidate, controlled committee, or committee primarily supporting or opposing a candidate or a measure in connection with a report or statement required by specified provisions of the act until after the last date for filing the first report or statement following the general, runoff, or special election for the office for which the candidate ran, or following the election at which the measure was adopted or defeated, except as provided. The act prescribes the scope of campaign statements and reports to be included in audits and investigations of candidates, controlled committees, or committees primarily supporting or opposing a candidate or a measure. This bill would delete these provisions that delay the commencement of an audit or investigation and prescribe the scope of audits and investigations. In addition to the general auditing requirements imposed on the Franchise Tax Board as described above, the act authorizes the Franchise Tax Board and the Fair Political Practices Commission to make investigations and audits with respect to any reports or statements required by specified provisions of the act regarding campaign disclosure, limitations on contributions, and lobbyists. This bill would expand this authority to allow the Franchise Tax Board and the Fair Political Practices Commission to make investigations and audits with respect to any reports or statements required under the act. The act requires the Franchise Tax Board periodically to prepare reports regarding its audit and investigations under the act and send them to the Commission, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General. The act requires the board to complete its report of any audit conducted on a random basis pursuant to a specified statute within one year after the person or entity subject to the audit is selected by the Commission to be audited. This bill would extend the deadline for the Franchise Tax Board to complete its report of an audit conducted on a random basis from one to two years after the person or entity to be audited is selected by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The act prohibits a member, employee, or agent of the Franchise Tax Board from divulging or making known in any manner any particulars of any record, documents, or information which he or she receives by virtue of conducting audits and investigations, except as provided. This bill, in addition, would make this prohibition applicable to a member, employee, or agent of the Fair Political Practices Commission. This bill would authorize the Fair Political Practices Commission, and the Franchise Tax Board at the direction of the Commission, to audit any record required to be maintained under the act in order to ensure compliance with the act prior to an election, even if the record is a report or statement that has not yet been filed. The bill would authorize the Commission to seek injunctive relief in a superior court to compel disclosure consistent with the act, and would require a court to grant expedited review of an action filed pursuant to this provision, as specified. (4) Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (5) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. The bill would delay the operative date of its provisions until July 1, 2014.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 04/03/14 - Chaptered Current pdf April 03, 2014
- Enrolled 03/12/14 - Enrolled pdf March 12, 2014
- Amended 01/14/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 14, 2014
- Amended 06/13/13 - Amended Senate pdf June 13, 2013
- Amended 04/30/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 30, 2013
- Amended 04/15/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 15, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- AB800 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 9, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:45 p.m.
-
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 19. Page 4047.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after February 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 2782.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
-
In Senate. Held at Desk.
-
Ordered to the Senate.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Page 3499.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Gordon.
-
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 3375.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 2397.).
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2385.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Lieu.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2385.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 22. Page 1839.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 8).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 23).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Dickinson · Cosponsor
- Gordon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gordon
Co-sponsors (1)
- Dickinson
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 16 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 19 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 24% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 19 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 28% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 17 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 28% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 800 do?
- (1) The Political Reform Act of 1974 prohibits an agent or independent contractor from making an expenditure of $500 or more, other than overhead or normal operating expenses, on behalf of or for the benefit of any candidate or committee unless it is reported by the candidate or committee as if the expenditure were made directly by the candidate or committee. The act requires an agent or independent contractor to make known to the candidate or committee all information subject to this reporting requirement. This bill, in addition, would require a subagent or subcontractor who provides goods or services to or for the benefit of a candidate or committee to make known to the agent or independent contractor all of the information subject to the reporting requirement described above, and would require that disclosure of this information by a subagent or subcontractor to the agent or independent contractor or by the agent or independent contractor to the candidate or committee occur no later than three working days prior to the time the campaign statement reporting the expenditure is required to be filed, except that an expenditure that is required to be reported as a late contribution or late independent expenditure must be reported to the candidate or committee within 24 hours of the time that it is made. (2) The act defines as "surplus campaign funds" campaign funds that are under the control of a former candidate or former elected officer as of the date of leaving elective office or the end of the postelection reporting period following the defeat of the candidate for elective office, whichever occurs last. The act restricts the purposes for which surplus campaign funds may be expended. This bill would increase the time at which campaign funds become surplus campaign funds by 90 days following either the officer leaving elective office or the end of the postelection reporting period following the defeat of a candidate, whichever occurs last. (3) The act requires the Franchise Tax Board to conduct audits and field investigations of various financial statements required to be submitted by lobbying firms, lobbyist employers, candidates, and specified committees. The act prohibits the commencement of an audit or investigation of a candidate, controlled committee, or committee primarily supporting or opposing a candidate or a measure in connection with a report or statement required by specified provisions of the act until after the last date for filing the first report or statement following the general, runoff, or special election for the office for which the candidate ran, or following the election at which the measure was adopted or defeated, except as provided. The act prescribes the scope of campaign statements and reports to be included in audits and investigations of candidates, controlled committees, or committees primarily supporting or opposing a candidate or a measure. This bill would delete these provisions that delay the commencement of an audit or investigation and prescribe the scope of audits and investigations. In addition to the general auditing requirements imposed on the Franchise Tax Board as described above, the act authorizes the Franchise Tax Board and the Fair Political Practices Commission to make investigations and audits with respect to any reports or statements required by specified provisions of the act regarding campaign disclosure, limitations on contributions, and lobbyists. This bill would expand this authority to allow the Franchise Tax Board and the Fair Political Practices Commission to make investigations and audits with respect to any reports or statements required under the act. The act requires the Franchise Tax Board periodically to prepare reports regarding its audit and investigations under the act and send them to the Commission, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General. The act requires the board to complete its report of any audit conducted on a random basis pursuant to a specified statute within one year after the person or entity subject to the audit is selected by the Commission to be audited. This bill would extend the deadline for the Franchise Tax Board to complete its report of an audit conducted on a random basis from one to two years after the person or entity to be audited is selected by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The act prohibits a member, employee, or agent of the Franchise Tax Board from divulging or making known in any manner any particulars of any record, documents, or information which he or she receives by virtue of conducting audits and investigations, except as provided. This bill, in addition, would make this prohibition applicable to a member, employee, or agent of the Fair Political Practices Commission. This bill would authorize the Fair Political Practices Commission, and the Franchise Tax Board at the direction of the Commission, to audit any record required to be maintained under the act in order to ensure compliance with the act prior to an election, even if the record is a report or statement that has not yet been filed. The bill would authorize the Commission to seek injunctive relief in a superior court to compel disclosure consistent with the act, and would require a court to grant expedited review of an action filed pursuant to this provision, as specified. (4) Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (5) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. The bill would delay the operative date of its provisions until July 1, 2014.
- Who sponsors AB 800?
- AB 800 is sponsored by Dickinson and Gordon.
- What is the current status of AB 800?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 800?
- Track AB 800 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 800
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 800
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →