California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2605 — Pharmacy: third-party logistics providers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 507, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under the Pharmacy Law, a violation of which is a crime, the California State Board of Pharmacy licenses and regulates the practice of pharmacy. Existing law restricts the purchase, trade, sale, or transfer of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices, as defined, to licensed wholesalers and other authorized persons. Under the Pharmacy Law, the board licenses and regulates entities, including third-party logistics providers, as wholesalers. The Pharmacy Law defines a "third-party logistics provider" or a "reverse third-party logistics provider" as an entity licensed as a wholesaler that contracts with a dangerous drug manufacturer to provide or coordinate warehousing, distribution, or other similar services on behalf of a manufacturer, but for which there is no change of ownership in the dangerous drugs. Existing law requires a wholesaler to have a pharmacist or designated representative on its premises and to be supervised or managed by a designated representative-in-charge. Existing law requires a separate license for each place of business owned or operated by a wholesaler. Existing law also requires a wholesaler to submit a surety bond of $100,000 payable to a specified fund of the board to secure payment of any administrative fine imposed by the board. Existing law, the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act, prohibits a third-party logistics provider, as defined, from conducting any activities in a state unless each facility of the provider is licensed by the state from which drugs are distributed by the provider in accordance with regulations to be promulgated by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. This bill would revise the definition of the terms "third-party logistics provider" and "reverse third-party logistics provider" to conform to federal law, as specified, and would require a third-party logistics provider of a dangerous drug or dangerous device to be separately licensed by the board as a third-party logistics provider. The bill would require a third-party logistics provider to be supervised and managed by a responsible manager who would need to be licensed by the board as a designated representative-3PL. Under the bill, a designated representative-3PL and a responsible manager would be subject to similar requirements as those imposed on a designated representative and a designated representative-in-charge, respectively. The bill would limit a place of business to a single board-issued license, except for entities under common ownership that meet specified requirements, and would require that at least one designated representative, in the case of a wholesaler, or designated representative-3PL, in the case of a third-party logistics provider, be present during business hours for each licensed place of business. The bill would require a third-party logistics provider to submit a surety bond of $90,000 payable to a specified fund of the board to secure payment of any administrative fine imposed by the board. The bill would enact parallel requirements with respect to nonresident third-party logistics providers and would make related conforming changes and delete obsolete provisions. After specified federal regulations under the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act are promulgated, the bill would require the board to act to identify any California laws governing interstate commerce in conflict with those regulations and act to remove the conflict. Existing law makes a wholesaler that uses the services of a carrier liable for the security and integrity of any dangerous drug or devices through that carrier until the drugs or devices are delivered to the transferee. This bill would extend that liability when the wholesaler uses the services of a third-party logistics provider and would require a third-party logistics provider that uses the services of a carrier to have in place and comply with specified written policies and procedures. (2) Existing law requires that all records of manufacture and of sale, acquisition, or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices be open to inspection by authorized officers of the law during business hours and be preserved for at least 3 years. This bill would make those requirements also applicable to records of receipt and shipment of dangerous drugs and dangerous devices. The bill would also require a manufacturer, wholesaler, third-party logistics provider, or pharmacy that has reasonable cause to believe that a dangerous drug or device that is or was in its possession, and has been sold or distributed in or through California, is counterfeit or the subject of a fraudulent transaction to notify the board within 72 hours of obtaining that knowledge. (3) Existing law sets the fees for the issuance and renewal of licenses for wholesalers and designated representatives at specified amounts and authorizes those fees to be increased to specified higher amounts. This bill would instead set the fees at the higher amounts. (4) Because a violation of the requirements described in paragraphs (1) and (2) above would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 507, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 70. Noes 3. Page 6590.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 56. Noes 21. Page 6571.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4860.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 4).

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  14. Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 5165.)

  17. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From consent calendar.

  19. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  20. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).

  21. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 29).

  24. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  31. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bonilla · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Bonilla

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democratic 2001
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Monning — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Beall — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 70 Yea · 3 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 63306
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 70306
% of votes cast 89%4%0%8%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Weber — Yea
Daly — Not Voting
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Hall — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Holden — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Campos — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 74 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68103
Democratic 3001
Republican 3000
Total 74104
% of votes cast 94%1%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Salas — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Buchanan — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Fox — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11002
Republican 0001
Total 11003
% of votes cast 79%0%0%21%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Bocanegra — Yea
Hagman — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Ting — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2605 do?
(1) Under the Pharmacy Law, a violation of which is a crime, the California State Board of Pharmacy licenses and regulates the practice of pharmacy. Existing law restricts the purchase, trade, sale, or transfer of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices, as defined, to licensed wholesalers and other authorized persons. Under the Pharmacy Law, the board licenses and regulates entities, including third-party logistics providers, as wholesalers. The Pharmacy Law defines a "third-party logistics provider" or a "reverse third-party logistics provider" as an entity licensed as a wholesaler that contracts with a dangerous drug manufacturer to provide or coordinate warehousing, distribution, or other similar services on behalf of a manufacturer, but for which there is no change of ownership in the dangerous drugs. Existing law requires a wholesaler to have a pharmacist or designated representative on its premises and to be supervised or managed by a designated representative-in-charge. Existing law requires a separate license for each place of business owned or operated by a wholesaler. Existing law also requires a wholesaler to submit a surety bond of $100,000 payable to a specified fund of the board to secure payment of any administrative fine imposed by the board. Existing law, the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act, prohibits a third-party logistics provider, as defined, from conducting any activities in a state unless each facility of the provider is licensed by the state from which drugs are distributed by the provider in accordance with regulations to be promulgated by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. This bill would revise the definition of the terms "third-party logistics provider" and "reverse third-party logistics provider" to conform to federal law, as specified, and would require a third-party logistics provider of a dangerous drug or dangerous device to be separately licensed by the board as a third-party logistics provider. The bill would require a third-party logistics provider to be supervised and managed by a responsible manager who would need to be licensed by the board as a designated representative-3PL. Under the bill, a designated representative-3PL and a responsible manager would be subject to similar requirements as those imposed on a designated representative and a designated representative-in-charge, respectively. The bill would limit a place of business to a single board-issued license, except for entities under common ownership that meet specified requirements, and would require that at least one designated representative, in the case of a wholesaler, or designated representative-3PL, in the case of a third-party logistics provider, be present during business hours for each licensed place of business. The bill would require a third-party logistics provider to submit a surety bond of $90,000 payable to a specified fund of the board to secure payment of any administrative fine imposed by the board. The bill would enact parallel requirements with respect to nonresident third-party logistics providers and would make related conforming changes and delete obsolete provisions. After specified federal regulations under the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act are promulgated, the bill would require the board to act to identify any California laws governing interstate commerce in conflict with those regulations and act to remove the conflict. Existing law makes a wholesaler that uses the services of a carrier liable for the security and integrity of any dangerous drug or devices through that carrier until the drugs or devices are delivered to the transferee. This bill would extend that liability when the wholesaler uses the services of a third-party logistics provider and would require a third-party logistics provider that uses the services of a carrier to have in place and comply with specified written policies and procedures. (2) Existing law requires that all records of manufacture and of sale, acquisition, or disposition of dangerous drugs or dangerous devices be open to inspection by authorized officers of the law during business hours and be preserved for at least 3 years. This bill would make those requirements also applicable to records of receipt and shipment of dangerous drugs and dangerous devices. The bill would also require a manufacturer, wholesaler, third-party logistics provider, or pharmacy that has reasonable cause to believe that a dangerous drug or device that is or was in its possession, and has been sold or distributed in or through California, is counterfeit or the subject of a fraudulent transaction to notify the board within 72 hours of obtaining that knowledge. (3) Existing law sets the fees for the issuance and renewal of licenses for wholesalers and designated representatives at specified amounts and authorizes those fees to be increased to specified higher amounts. This bill would instead set the fees at the higher amounts. (4) Because a violation of the requirements described in paragraphs (1) and (2) above would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2605?
AB 2605 is sponsored by Bonilla.
What is the current status of AB 2605?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2605?
Track AB 2605 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2605

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2605

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →