District agricultural associations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2490 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2490.
You're tracking AB 2490
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2490 — District agricultural associations.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 342, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law divides the state into agricultural districts, and provides for the management of these districts by district agricultural associations. Existing law provides for a board of directors for each district agricultural association, and provides for the appointment of each director by the Governor. Existing law sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the board of directors and the district agricultural associations, and requires a district agricultural association to take certain actions only with the approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture or the Department of General Services, or both. This bill would authorize the Governor to remove any director of a district agricultural association for cause prior to the expiration of the director's term. The bill would revise the oversight responsibilities of the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of General Services in connection with district agricultural associations by deleting the requirement that a district agricultural association obtain approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture or the Department of General Services prior to exercising certain powers, including the power to sue, entering into a settlement agreement for less than $100,000, or contracting or exercising certain powers over its own real or personal property. The bill would require a district agricultural association to comply with specified contracting procedures, including, among others, soliciting bids in writing if the cost of a project exceeds $25,000. The bill would authorize the board of directors of a district agricultural association, with the approval of the Department of General Services, to purchase, acquire, hold, sell, exchange, or convey any interest in real property. The bill would require a district agricultural association to adopt a fiscal review policy that would provide for annual audits, as specified. The bill would also specify that a district agricultural association shall not be required to prepare or submit any written report to the Governor, the Legislature, or a state agency, except as specified. (2) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to exercise oversight of the acquisition and replacement of motor vehicles and other mobile equipment by a state agency. Existing law defines "state agency" for purposes of those provisions. Existing law requires the Trustees of the California State University to purchase vehicles using statewide commodity contracts, to the greatest extent feasible, and to make an interim report to the Governor and the Legislature on January 1, 2014, and a final report on January 1, 2015, containing certain information relative to motor vehicle procurement by the California State University. Existing law repeals these provisions as of July 1, 2015. This bill would exclude district agricultural associations from the definition of "state agency" for purposes of those provisions and would continue the operation of these provisions beyond July 1, 2015, except for the requirement on the Trustees of the California State University. (3) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to annually prepare a delegation program for district agricultural associations, to be administered by the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of General Services. Existing law also requires the Department of Food and Agriculture, for district agricultural associations and other fairs, to develop criteria to be applied for purchases made locally at a price equal to or lower than the price available through the state purchasing program. This bill would repeal those provisions. (4) Existing law requires each state agency to submit an annual report to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery summarizing its progress in reducing solid waste that is due on or before May 1 each year. This bill would exclude district agricultural associations from the definition of "state agency" for purposes of those provisions. (5) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/15/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 15, 2014
- Enrolled 08/21/14 - Enrolled pdf August 21, 2014
- Amended 08/13/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 13, 2014
- Amended 06/11/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 11, 2014
- Amended 04/24/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 24, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2490 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 342, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 6269.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 4562.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5164.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 14).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Eggman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Eggman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 3% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 3% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2490 do?
- (1) Existing law divides the state into agricultural districts, and provides for the management of these districts by district agricultural associations. Existing law provides for a board of directors for each district agricultural association, and provides for the appointment of each director by the Governor. Existing law sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the board of directors and the district agricultural associations, and requires a district agricultural association to take certain actions only with the approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture or the Department of General Services, or both. This bill would authorize the Governor to remove any director of a district agricultural association for cause prior to the expiration of the director's term. The bill would revise the oversight responsibilities of the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of General Services in connection with district agricultural associations by deleting the requirement that a district agricultural association obtain approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture or the Department of General Services prior to exercising certain powers, including the power to sue, entering into a settlement agreement for less than $100,000, or contracting or exercising certain powers over its own real or personal property. The bill would require a district agricultural association to comply with specified contracting procedures, including, among others, soliciting bids in writing if the cost of a project exceeds $25,000. The bill would authorize the board of directors of a district agricultural association, with the approval of the Department of General Services, to purchase, acquire, hold, sell, exchange, or convey any interest in real property. The bill would require a district agricultural association to adopt a fiscal review policy that would provide for annual audits, as specified. The bill would also specify that a district agricultural association shall not be required to prepare or submit any written report to the Governor, the Legislature, or a state agency, except as specified. (2) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to exercise oversight of the acquisition and replacement of motor vehicles and other mobile equipment by a state agency. Existing law defines "state agency" for purposes of those provisions. Existing law requires the Trustees of the California State University to purchase vehicles using statewide commodity contracts, to the greatest extent feasible, and to make an interim report to the Governor and the Legislature on January 1, 2014, and a final report on January 1, 2015, containing certain information relative to motor vehicle procurement by the California State University. Existing law repeals these provisions as of July 1, 2015. This bill would exclude district agricultural associations from the definition of "state agency" for purposes of those provisions and would continue the operation of these provisions beyond July 1, 2015, except for the requirement on the Trustees of the California State University. (3) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to annually prepare a delegation program for district agricultural associations, to be administered by the Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of General Services. Existing law also requires the Department of Food and Agriculture, for district agricultural associations and other fairs, to develop criteria to be applied for purchases made locally at a price equal to or lower than the price available through the state purchasing program. This bill would repeal those provisions. (4) Existing law requires each state agency to submit an annual report to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery summarizing its progress in reducing solid waste that is due on or before May 1 each year. This bill would exclude district agricultural associations from the definition of "state agency" for purposes of those provisions. (5) This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes.
- Who sponsors AB 2490?
- AB 2490 is sponsored by Eggman.
- What is the current status of AB 2490?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2490?
- Track AB 2490 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2490
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2490
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →