California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 232 — California Central Coast State Veterans Cemetery at Fort Ord Endowment Fund.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 694, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law creates the California Central Coast State Veterans Cemetery at Fort Ord Endowment Fund (Endowment Fund) in the State Treasury, and requires moneys in the Endowment Fund to be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Department of Veterans Affairs for the annual administrative and oversight costs of the veterans cemetery, as specified, and to generate funding through interest for the veterans cemetery. Existing law requires moneys in the Endowment Fund to be invested to generate ongoing earnings to cover the estimated annual oversight and maintenance costs associated with the veterans cemetery, as provided. This bill would instead require any moneys to be allocated to the department for the nonreimbursable costs of design and construction and the annual operations and maintenance costs of the veterans cemetery for the next 10 years. This bill would allow, but not require, moneys in the fund to be invested to generate ongoing earnings to offset the estimated annual operations and maintenance costs associated with the veterans cemetery. Existing law requires the department to develop and submit a State Veterans Cemetery Grant Program application to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs for the establishment of a veterans cemetery upon the Controller's determination that the Endowment Fund has adequate principal to yield sufficient investment earnings in each year for the next 10 years, from the date of the determination, to fully fund the respective year's administrative and oversight costs, and to fund the estimated costs of developing and submitting the application, as specified. This bill would instead require the department to develop and submit an application upon the Controller's determination that the Endowment Fund has adequate amounts, in addition to funding the estimated costs of developing and submitting the application, to fully fund the nonreimbursable costs of design and construction and the operations and maintenance costs for the next 10 years. This bill would require the Controller to consider the estimated revenues from specified fees expected to be deposited into the Endowment Fund in making this determination. This bill would allow any moneys, if awarded, received from the State Veterans Cemetery Grant Program to be used to reimburse the Endowment Fund for specified allowable costs as established by that program. Existing law authorizes the Director of Finance to transfer up to $1,500,000 as a loan from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund, and requires the loan to be repaid with interest, as provided. This bill would repeal that authorization, and instead make an appropriation of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund for the construction of the California Central Coast State Veterans Cemetery at Fort Ord. This bill would require any amounts transferred by the Director of Finance as a loan from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund to be returned to the General Fund. This bill would make technical, conforming changes to change the references to "administrative and oversight" to "operations and maintenance." This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 694, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2433.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 2452.)

  6. Set for hearing September 12.

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2361.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3179.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Read third time and amended. (Page 2952.)

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  16. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Referred to Com. on L. & E.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 11. Page 1097.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1009.) (May 23).

  23. Set for hearing May 23.

  24. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  25. Set for hearing April 22.

  26. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 486.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Set for hearing April 10.

  28. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  29. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.

  30. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Cannella · Cosponsor
  • Monning · Primary
  • Roth · Cosponsor
  • Mark Stone · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Supp 2 SB232 Monning Urgency Clause Concurrence

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 3000
Total 38001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
Yee — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Correa — Yea
Beall — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

From committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13002
Democratic 1000
Total 14002
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Leno — Yea
Beall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 232 Monning Third Reading Urgency By STONE

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 2001
Total 77001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Gray — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11005
Democratic 1000
Total 12005
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Donnelly — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 251100
Democratic 3000
Total 281100
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance housing veterans
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 232 do?
Existing law creates the California Central Coast State Veterans Cemetery at Fort Ord Endowment Fund (Endowment Fund) in the State Treasury, and requires moneys in the Endowment Fund to be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Department of Veterans Affairs for the annual administrative and oversight costs of the veterans cemetery, as specified, and to generate funding through interest for the veterans cemetery. Existing law requires moneys in the Endowment Fund to be invested to generate ongoing earnings to cover the estimated annual oversight and maintenance costs associated with the veterans cemetery, as provided. This bill would instead require any moneys to be allocated to the department for the nonreimbursable costs of design and construction and the annual operations and maintenance costs of the veterans cemetery for the next 10 years. This bill would allow, but not require, moneys in the fund to be invested to generate ongoing earnings to offset the estimated annual operations and maintenance costs associated with the veterans cemetery. Existing law requires the department to develop and submit a State Veterans Cemetery Grant Program application to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs for the establishment of a veterans cemetery upon the Controller's determination that the Endowment Fund has adequate principal to yield sufficient investment earnings in each year for the next 10 years, from the date of the determination, to fully fund the respective year's administrative and oversight costs, and to fund the estimated costs of developing and submitting the application, as specified. This bill would instead require the department to develop and submit an application upon the Controller's determination that the Endowment Fund has adequate amounts, in addition to funding the estimated costs of developing and submitting the application, to fully fund the nonreimbursable costs of design and construction and the operations and maintenance costs for the next 10 years. This bill would require the Controller to consider the estimated revenues from specified fees expected to be deposited into the Endowment Fund in making this determination. This bill would allow any moneys, if awarded, received from the State Veterans Cemetery Grant Program to be used to reimburse the Endowment Fund for specified allowable costs as established by that program. Existing law authorizes the Director of Finance to transfer up to $1,500,000 as a loan from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund, and requires the loan to be repaid with interest, as provided. This bill would repeal that authorization, and instead make an appropriation of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund for the construction of the California Central Coast State Veterans Cemetery at Fort Ord. This bill would require any amounts transferred by the Director of Finance as a loan from the General Fund to the Endowment Fund to be returned to the General Fund. This bill would make technical, conforming changes to change the references to "administrative and oversight" to "operations and maintenance." This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 232?
SB 232 is sponsored by Alejo, Cannella, Monning, Roth, and Mark Stone.
What is the current status of SB 232?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 232?
Track SB 232 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 232

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 232

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →