California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 358 — Lead hazard evaluation.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to implement and administer a program to meet the requirements of the federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992. Under existing law, a person who engages in lead hazard evaluations is required to obtain certification from the department and to comply with specified regulations. Violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would authorize the department to update the regulations on lead hazard evaluation methods in order to incorporate the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, as published in 2012 by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the recommendations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for paint test kits for renovation projects, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 3).

  7. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  8. Referred to Com. on E.Q.

  9. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 1606.)

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From consent calendar.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  14. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 15).

  15. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. Read second time and amended.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 30).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and HEALTH.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Holden · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Holden

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 358 HOLDEN Assembly Third Reading By ALEJO

Passed 71 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 62005
Democratic 6001
Republican 3001
Total 71007
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Logue — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Weber — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Bocanegra — Yea
Levine — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Campos — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 19 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Democratic 1000
Total 19000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 358 do?
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to implement and administer a program to meet the requirements of the federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992. Under existing law, a person who engages in lead hazard evaluations is required to obtain certification from the department and to comply with specified regulations. Violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would authorize the department to update the regulations on lead hazard evaluation methods in order to incorporate the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, as published in 2012 by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the recommendations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for paint test kits for renovation projects, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 358?
AB 358 is sponsored by Holden.
What is the current status of AB 358?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 358?
Track AB 358 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 358

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 358

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →