California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 94 — Education finance: higher education.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 50, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission as the primary state agency for the administration of state-authorized student financial aid programs available to students attending all segments of postsecondary education. Under existing law, the commission, among other things, administers the Cal Grant Program, the Student Opportunity and Access Program, the Assumption Program of Loans for Education, the Graduate Assumption Program of Loans for Education, the Public Interest Attorney Loan Repayment Program, and the California State Work-Study Program. The commission also oversees the state's participation in the Federal Family Education Loan Program. This bill would authorize the commission to enter into an agreement with a public agency of a state other than California, or a private entity related to an agency of another state, to assist the other agency or entity in implementing financial aid programs, including assistance with processing grants, fellowships, and loans through the use of automated information systems. The bill would create a Financial Aid Technical Assistance Fund, and would make moneys in the fund available to the commission, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of the bill. The bill would require the commission to establish fees for services provided under the bill, and would require that the fees be deposited in the fund. The bill would authorize the use of residual moneys in the fund for improvement of financial aid services for California. The bill would require the commission, beginning October 1, 2014, to submit an annual report, as prescribed, to the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee detailing the total revenues collected in the fund, by service provided and applicable fee collected, and the use of the moneys in the fund. (2) Existing law provides for a public postsecondary education system in this state. This system consists of the University of California, the California State University, and the California Community Colleges. Existing law authorizes these institutions to require that mandatory systemwide fees and tuition, among other fees, be paid by students at these institutions. This bill would establish the Middle Class Scholarship Program under the administration of the Student Aid Commission. The bill would provide that, subject to an available and sufficient appropriation, commencing with the 2014–15 academic year, undergraduate students enrolled at the University of California or the California State University would receive a scholarship award that, combined with other publicly funded student financial aid, as defined, received by an eligible student, would be up to 40% of the amount charged to that student for mandatory systemwide tuition in that fiscal year if the student meets the following conditions: has an annual household income that does not exceed $150,000; satisfies specified requirements for a Cal Grant award; is a resident of this state or exempt from paying nonresident tuition; files specified financial aid forms; makes timely application or applications for publicly funded student financial aid, as defined, for which he or she is eligible; and maintains at least a 2.0 grade point average. The bill would provide that a student whose annual household income exceeds $100,000, but does not exceed $150,000, and who otherwise meets the program requirements, would receive a scholarship award that is reduced in accordance with prescribed calculations. The bill would require, in order for students enrolled in their respective segments to remain eligible to receive financial aid under the bill, that the University of California and the California State University maintain their respective institutional need-based grant program policies and maintain their funding amounts at a level that, at a minimum, is equal to the level maintained during the 2013–14 academic year. The bill would require the Student Aid Commission to annually determine if the amounts appropriated under the bill in each fiscal year are sufficient to cover the costs of the scholarships as projected to be awarded pursuant to the program. The bill would require, if those amounts are not sufficient for this purpose, that the scholarships be reduced proportionately by an equal percentage for all recipients of scholarships under the bill. The bill would establish the Middle Class Scholarship Fund, and would specify amounts to be transferred, upon the order of the Director of Finance, from the General Fund to the Middle Class Scholarship Fund for annual appropriation to the Student Aid Commission for allocation for purposes of the bill. The bill, beginning with the 2014–15 fiscal year, would require the Department of Finance to include in the Governor's Budget proposal a fund condition statement for the Middle Class Scholarship Fund for the fiscal year of the proposed budget and the 2 immediately preceding fiscal years. (3) Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. This bill would require the California State University to report biennially to the Legislature and the Department of Finance, beginning on or before October 1, 2014, and on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year through 2020, on the total costs of education at the university on a systemwide and campus-by-campus basis, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 academic year, would require the California State University to report, by March 1 of each year, on specified performance measures, including various calculations of graduation rates and amounts spent per degree, for the preceding academic year. This bill would require the contributions of the California State University to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund to be based on pensionable compensation and the rates set forth in the annual Budget Act and to be paid out of the total appropriation of the university in the annual Budget Act. The bill would specify that, beginning in the 2013–14 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, annual adjustments to the appropriation for the pension contributions of the California State University would be based on the university's pensionable payroll for the 2013–14 fiscal year, as identified by the Controller's office. This bill would authorize the Director of Finance to defer payment of General Fund moneys, in a cumulative amount not to exceed $250,000,000 annually, appropriated to the California State University in the annual Budget Act, for payment in May or June of the same fiscal year for which the original payment would have been made. (4) Existing law creates the University of California, administered by the Regents of the University of California, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. The University of California operates campuses at Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, Merced, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz. Existing law authorizes the University of California to issue revenue bonds, secured by a specified pledge of revenues. This bill would authorize the University of California to pledge its annual General Fund support appropriation, less certain amounts, to secure the payment of its general revenue bonds or commercial paper associated with the general revenue bond program. The bill would authorize the university to fund debt service for capital expenditures, as defined, from its General Fund support appropriation, as specified. The bill would provide that these provisions do not require the Legislature to make an appropriation from the General Fund to the university in any specific amount. The bill would also authorize the university to fund pay-as-you-go capital outlay projects from its General Fund support appropriation, as specified. This bill would require the University of California, if it is able to reduce annual debt service costs by refunding, defeasing, or retiring general obligation bonds or State Public Works Board lease revenue bonds pursuant to these provisions, to annually contribute an equal amount to reduce the existing unfunded liability of the University of California Retirement Plan. This bill would require the University of California to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the Department of Finance if it plans to use any of its support appropriation for capital outlay projects in each fiscal year, as specified. The bill would require the committee and the department to review the report by specified dates, and would authorize the department to approve capital outlay projects pursuant to specified procedures. The bill would also require the university to submit a progress report by April 1 of each year to the committee and the department detailing the scope and funding of each project. The bill would require the university to manage its general revenue bond program so that not more than 15% of its General Fund support appropriation, less a prescribed amount, is used for the total of the following: debt service for specified capital expenditures, pay-as-you-go capital outlay, and State Public Works Board rental payments. This bill would require the University of California to report biennially to the Legislature and the Department of Finance, beginning on or before October 1, 2014, and on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year through 2020, on the total costs of education at the university on a systemwide and campus-by-campus basis, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 academic year, would require the University of California to report, by March 1 of each year, on specified performance measures, including various calculations of graduation rates and amounts spent per degree, for the preceding academic year. This bill would appropriate $375,000 from the 1996 Higher Education Capital Outlay Bond Fund to the University of California for the purpose of funding the equipment phase of the Science and Engineering Building at the Merced campus, as specified, during the 2013–14 fiscal year, with the appropriation available for encumbrance until June 30, 2016, subject to the enactment of a resolution by the Regents of the University of California requiring the payment of prevailing wage rates by the contractors and subcontractors working on this project, and all other capital outlay projects undertaken by the University of California that are funded using nonstate funds or are otherwise not financed with the funds appropriated for this project, during the 2013–14 fiscal year. This bill would require the University of California to allocate and encumber from a specified appropriation the amount necessary to pay in full all amounts that are reasonably anticipated to become due and payable during the 2013–14 fiscal year for lease revenue and general obligation bond debt service. The bill would require the Controller to transfer funds from the specified appropriation in accordance with specified schedules. This bill would allocate $15,000,000 from a specified appropriation in the Budget Act of 2013 to the Regents of the University of California for the School of Medicine at the University of California, Riverside, for specified purposes. The bill would require, on or before April 1 of each year, the University of California to provide progress reports and specified information consistent with the published mission and vision of the University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature pertaining to funding, recruitment, hiring, and outcomes for the University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine. The bill would declare that the absence of language in the Budget Act of 2013 specifying that the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law shall use budgeted funds for retirement costs is not an indication of legislative support for, or acceptance of, increased retirement costs being paid for by employees of the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 50, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 9. Page 2047.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 2045.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 2045.)

  7. Measure version as amended on June 13 corrected.

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1385.).

  10. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1363.)

  11. (Ayes 24. Noes 6. Page 1361.)

  12. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Withdrawn from committee.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  15. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1399.)

  18. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1314.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)

  21. Ordered to second reading.

  22. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1312.)

  23. Withdrawn from committee.

  24. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Corbett — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 65 Yea · 9 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 59504
Democratic 6100
Republican 0301
Total 65905
% of votes cast 82%11%0%6%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Hall — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 24 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452003
Democratic 6001
Republican 0400
Total 512404
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Stone — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Not Voting
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 94 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission as the primary state agency for the administration of state-authorized student financial aid programs available to students attending all segments of postsecondary education. Under existing law, the commission, among other things, administers the Cal Grant Program, the Student Opportunity and Access Program, the Assumption Program of Loans for Education, the Graduate Assumption Program of Loans for Education, the Public Interest Attorney Loan Repayment Program, and the California State Work-Study Program. The commission also oversees the state's participation in the Federal Family Education Loan Program. This bill would authorize the commission to enter into an agreement with a public agency of a state other than California, or a private entity related to an agency of another state, to assist the other agency or entity in implementing financial aid programs, including assistance with processing grants, fellowships, and loans through the use of automated information systems. The bill would create a Financial Aid Technical Assistance Fund, and would make moneys in the fund available to the commission, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of the bill. The bill would require the commission to establish fees for services provided under the bill, and would require that the fees be deposited in the fund. The bill would authorize the use of residual moneys in the fund for improvement of financial aid services for California. The bill would require the commission, beginning October 1, 2014, to submit an annual report, as prescribed, to the Department of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee detailing the total revenues collected in the fund, by service provided and applicable fee collected, and the use of the moneys in the fund. (2) Existing law provides for a public postsecondary education system in this state. This system consists of the University of California, the California State University, and the California Community Colleges. Existing law authorizes these institutions to require that mandatory systemwide fees and tuition, among other fees, be paid by students at these institutions. This bill would establish the Middle Class Scholarship Program under the administration of the Student Aid Commission. The bill would provide that, subject to an available and sufficient appropriation, commencing with the 2014–15 academic year, undergraduate students enrolled at the University of California or the California State University would receive a scholarship award that, combined with other publicly funded student financial aid, as defined, received by an eligible student, would be up to 40% of the amount charged to that student for mandatory systemwide tuition in that fiscal year if the student meets the following conditions: has an annual household income that does not exceed $150,000; satisfies specified requirements for a Cal Grant award; is a resident of this state or exempt from paying nonresident tuition; files specified financial aid forms; makes timely application or applications for publicly funded student financial aid, as defined, for which he or she is eligible; and maintains at least a 2.0 grade point average. The bill would provide that a student whose annual household income exceeds $100,000, but does not exceed $150,000, and who otherwise meets the program requirements, would receive a scholarship award that is reduced in accordance with prescribed calculations. The bill would require, in order for students enrolled in their respective segments to remain eligible to receive financial aid under the bill, that the University of California and the California State University maintain their respective institutional need-based grant program policies and maintain their funding amounts at a level that, at a minimum, is equal to the level maintained during the 2013–14 academic year. The bill would require the Student Aid Commission to annually determine if the amounts appropriated under the bill in each fiscal year are sufficient to cover the costs of the scholarships as projected to be awarded pursuant to the program. The bill would require, if those amounts are not sufficient for this purpose, that the scholarships be reduced proportionately by an equal percentage for all recipients of scholarships under the bill. The bill would establish the Middle Class Scholarship Fund, and would specify amounts to be transferred, upon the order of the Director of Finance, from the General Fund to the Middle Class Scholarship Fund for annual appropriation to the Student Aid Commission for allocation for purposes of the bill. The bill, beginning with the 2014–15 fiscal year, would require the Department of Finance to include in the Governor's Budget proposal a fund condition statement for the Middle Class Scholarship Fund for the fiscal year of the proposed budget and the 2 immediately preceding fiscal years. (3) Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. This bill would require the California State University to report biennially to the Legislature and the Department of Finance, beginning on or before October 1, 2014, and on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year through 2020, on the total costs of education at the university on a systemwide and campus-by-campus basis, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 academic year, would require the California State University to report, by March 1 of each year, on specified performance measures, including various calculations of graduation rates and amounts spent per degree, for the preceding academic year. This bill would require the contributions of the California State University to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund to be based on pensionable compensation and the rates set forth in the annual Budget Act and to be paid out of the total appropriation of the university in the annual Budget Act. The bill would specify that, beginning in the 2013–14 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, annual adjustments to the appropriation for the pension contributions of the California State University would be based on the university's pensionable payroll for the 2013–14 fiscal year, as identified by the Controller's office. This bill would authorize the Director of Finance to defer payment of General Fund moneys, in a cumulative amount not to exceed $250,000,000 annually, appropriated to the California State University in the annual Budget Act, for payment in May or June of the same fiscal year for which the original payment would have been made. (4) Existing law creates the University of California, administered by the Regents of the University of California, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. The University of California operates campuses at Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, Merced, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz. Existing law authorizes the University of California to issue revenue bonds, secured by a specified pledge of revenues. This bill would authorize the University of California to pledge its annual General Fund support appropriation, less certain amounts, to secure the payment of its general revenue bonds or commercial paper associated with the general revenue bond program. The bill would authorize the university to fund debt service for capital expenditures, as defined, from its General Fund support appropriation, as specified. The bill would provide that these provisions do not require the Legislature to make an appropriation from the General Fund to the university in any specific amount. The bill would also authorize the university to fund pay-as-you-go capital outlay projects from its General Fund support appropriation, as specified. This bill would require the University of California, if it is able to reduce annual debt service costs by refunding, defeasing, or retiring general obligation bonds or State Public Works Board lease revenue bonds pursuant to these provisions, to annually contribute an equal amount to reduce the existing unfunded liability of the University of California Retirement Plan. This bill would require the University of California to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the Department of Finance if it plans to use any of its support appropriation for capital outlay projects in each fiscal year, as specified. The bill would require the committee and the department to review the report by specified dates, and would authorize the department to approve capital outlay projects pursuant to specified procedures. The bill would also require the university to submit a progress report by April 1 of each year to the committee and the department detailing the scope and funding of each project. The bill would require the university to manage its general revenue bond program so that not more than 15% of its General Fund support appropriation, less a prescribed amount, is used for the total of the following: debt service for specified capital expenditures, pay-as-you-go capital outlay, and State Public Works Board rental payments. This bill would require the University of California to report biennially to the Legislature and the Department of Finance, beginning on or before October 1, 2014, and on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year through 2020, on the total costs of education at the university on a systemwide and campus-by-campus basis, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 academic year, would require the University of California to report, by March 1 of each year, on specified performance measures, including various calculations of graduation rates and amounts spent per degree, for the preceding academic year. This bill would appropriate $375,000 from the 1996 Higher Education Capital Outlay Bond Fund to the University of California for the purpose of funding the equipment phase of the Science and Engineering Building at the Merced campus, as specified, during the 2013–14 fiscal year, with the appropriation available for encumbrance until June 30, 2016, subject to the enactment of a resolution by the Regents of the University of California requiring the payment of prevailing wage rates by the contractors and subcontractors working on this project, and all other capital outlay projects undertaken by the University of California that are funded using nonstate funds or are otherwise not financed with the funds appropriated for this project, during the 2013–14 fiscal year. This bill would require the University of California to allocate and encumber from a specified appropriation the amount necessary to pay in full all amounts that are reasonably anticipated to become due and payable during the 2013–14 fiscal year for lease revenue and general obligation bond debt service. The bill would require the Controller to transfer funds from the specified appropriation in accordance with specified schedules. This bill would allocate $15,000,000 from a specified appropriation in the Budget Act of 2013 to the Regents of the University of California for the School of Medicine at the University of California, Riverside, for specified purposes. The bill would require, on or before April 1 of each year, the University of California to provide progress reports and specified information consistent with the published mission and vision of the University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine to the relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature pertaining to funding, recruitment, hiring, and outcomes for the University of California, Riverside, School of Medicine. The bill would declare that the absence of language in the Budget Act of 2013 specifying that the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law shall use budgeted funds for retirement costs is not an indication of legislative support for, or acceptance of, increased retirement costs being paid for by employees of the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 94?
AB 94 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 94?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 94?
Track AB 94 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 94

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 94

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →