Workers' compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 258 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 258.
You're tracking SB 258
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 258 — Workers' compensation.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the 7-member Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, and provides that the members of the appeals board are appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. Existing law requires that 5 of the 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California, and provides that the other 2 members need not be attorneys. This bill would require that all 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California. Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires that medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment that is reasonably required to relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury be provided by the employer. Existing law prohibits a chiropractor from being a treating physician after the employee has received a certain number of chiropractic visits. This bill would correct an erroneous cross-reference with respect to these provisions. Existing law requires that a lien claimant is entitled to an order or award for reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee, together with interest at the rate allowed on civil judgments, if certain conditions are satisfied. This bill would specify that these fees are to be paid by the employer. Existing law requires an order or award for payment of a lien for medical or hospital treatment, as specified, to be made for payment only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses for medical or hospital treatment at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee unless the person has ceased doing business in the capacity held at the time the expenses were incurred and has assigned all right, title, and interest in the remaining accounts receivable to the assignee. This bill would authorize an assignment of that payment if the assignment was completed prior to January 1, 2013, or if it was required by a contract that became enforceable and irrevocable prior to January 1, 2013. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. Existing law authorizes an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation, including vocational rehabilitation services, within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability or that providing vocational rehabilitation services has become feasible because the employee's medical condition has improved or because of other factors not capable of determination at the time the employer's liability for vocational rehabilitation services otherwise terminated. This bill would delete the provisions relating to vocational rehabilitation, but retain the authority of an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/09/13 - Enrolled Current pdf September 09, 2013
- Amended 08/30/13 - Amended Assembly pdf August 30, 2013
- Amended 05/02/13 - Amended Senate pdf May 02, 2013
- Amended 03/19/13 - Amended Senate pdf March 19, 2013
- Introduced 02/13/13 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2013
- SB258 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 2164.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 2841.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Page 2795.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Atkins.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Atkins.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (August 7).
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 941.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 882.) (May 8).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Lieu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lieu
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 28% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 32% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 258 do?
- Existing law establishes the 7-member Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, and provides that the members of the appeals board are appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. Existing law requires that 5 of the 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California, and provides that the other 2 members need not be attorneys. This bill would require that all 7 members of the board be experienced attorneys admitted to practice in the State of California. Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires that medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment that is reasonably required to relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury be provided by the employer. Existing law prohibits a chiropractor from being a treating physician after the employee has received a certain number of chiropractic visits. This bill would correct an erroneous cross-reference with respect to these provisions. Existing law requires that a lien claimant is entitled to an order or award for reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee, together with interest at the rate allowed on civil judgments, if certain conditions are satisfied. This bill would specify that these fees are to be paid by the employer. Existing law requires an order or award for payment of a lien for medical or hospital treatment, as specified, to be made for payment only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses for medical or hospital treatment at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee unless the person has ceased doing business in the capacity held at the time the expenses were incurred and has assigned all right, title, and interest in the remaining accounts receivable to the assignee. This bill would authorize an assignment of that payment if the assignment was completed prior to January 1, 2013, or if it was required by a contract that became enforceable and irrevocable prior to January 1, 2013. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. Existing law authorizes an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation, including vocational rehabilitation services, within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability or that providing vocational rehabilitation services has become feasible because the employee's medical condition has improved or because of other factors not capable of determination at the time the employer's liability for vocational rehabilitation services otherwise terminated. This bill would delete the provisions relating to vocational rehabilitation, but retain the authority of an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability.
- Who sponsors SB 258?
- SB 258 is sponsored by Lieu.
- What is the current status of SB 258?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 258?
- Track SB 258 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 258
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 258
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →