The Corporate Securities Law of 1968.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 538 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 538.
You're tracking SB 538
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 538 — The Corporate Securities Law of 1968.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 335, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 provides for the regulation of the issuance of corporate securities. The law requires an offer or sale of a security that is exempt from registration under the federal Securities Act of 1933 to meet specified requirements, including filing a notice with the Commissioner of Corporations. Commencing on July 1, 2013, various duties of the Commission of Corporations under this law are transferred to the Commissioner of Business Oversight. This bill would modify references to that federal law. (2) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 authorizes the commissioner, after appropriate notice and opportunity for hearing, to levy administrative penalties, as specified. This bill would authorize, after exhaustion of administrative remedies, the commissioner to apply to the appropriate superior court for a civil judgment of the imposed penalties. (3) Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to offer or sell a security by means of making an untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary to make the statements not misleading, as specified. This bill would recast this provision and expand the basis for unlawful activity, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 authorizes the commission to order a person to refrain from violating certain of its provisions, and provides a person so ordered one year to seek an administrative hearing. This bill would reduce the period in which an individual may seek a hearing to 30 days, and authorize the commissioner to order a person to refrain from violating a rule or order adopted under the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, and to seek ancillary relief, including, but not limited to, a claim for restitution before an administrative law judge. This bill would also allow the commission to file an order for relief with the superior court to enforce a final order from an administrative proceeding that would have the same effect as a judgment of the superior court. (5) Existing law prohibits a person from, on behalf of a licensed broker-dealer or on behalf of an issuer, to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any security unless the broker-dealer and agent have complied with rules of the commissioner for the qualification and employment of those agents. Existing law prohibits a person from, on behalf of a certified investment adviser, offering or negotiating for the sale of investment advisory services of the investment adviser unless the investment adviser and person have complied with rules of the commissioner for the qualification and employment of those persons. Existing law requires the commissioner to impose a fee of $25 for the filing of a notice or report required by these rules. This bill would authorize the commissioner to impose a fee of $35 to keep a notice or report required under these provisions in effect for the following year. (6) This bill would also make legislative findings and declarations. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/13 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2013
- Enrolled 09/06/13 - Enrolled pdf September 06, 2013
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB538 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 335, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 68. Noes 1. Page 2877.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 30).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 6. Page 674.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 534.) (April 15).
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 404.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 68 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 1% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 0% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 6 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 16% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 538 do?
- (1) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 provides for the regulation of the issuance of corporate securities. The law requires an offer or sale of a security that is exempt from registration under the federal Securities Act of 1933 to meet specified requirements, including filing a notice with the Commissioner of Corporations. Commencing on July 1, 2013, various duties of the Commission of Corporations under this law are transferred to the Commissioner of Business Oversight. This bill would modify references to that federal law. (2) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 authorizes the commissioner, after appropriate notice and opportunity for hearing, to levy administrative penalties, as specified. This bill would authorize, after exhaustion of administrative remedies, the commissioner to apply to the appropriate superior court for a civil judgment of the imposed penalties. (3) Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to offer or sell a security by means of making an untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary to make the statements not misleading, as specified. This bill would recast this provision and expand the basis for unlawful activity, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The Corporate Securities Law of 1968 authorizes the commission to order a person to refrain from violating certain of its provisions, and provides a person so ordered one year to seek an administrative hearing. This bill would reduce the period in which an individual may seek a hearing to 30 days, and authorize the commissioner to order a person to refrain from violating a rule or order adopted under the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, and to seek ancillary relief, including, but not limited to, a claim for restitution before an administrative law judge. This bill would also allow the commission to file an order for relief with the superior court to enforce a final order from an administrative proceeding that would have the same effect as a judgment of the superior court. (5) Existing law prohibits a person from, on behalf of a licensed broker-dealer or on behalf of an issuer, to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any security unless the broker-dealer and agent have complied with rules of the commissioner for the qualification and employment of those agents. Existing law prohibits a person from, on behalf of a certified investment adviser, offering or negotiating for the sale of investment advisory services of the investment adviser unless the investment adviser and person have complied with rules of the commissioner for the qualification and employment of those persons. Existing law requires the commissioner to impose a fee of $25 for the filing of a notice or report required by these rules. This bill would authorize the commissioner to impose a fee of $35 to keep a notice or report required under these provisions in effect for the following year. (6) This bill would also make legislative findings and declarations. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 538?
- SB 538 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of SB 538?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 538?
- Track SB 538 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 538
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 538
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →