Medi-Cal: managed care: long-term services and supports: in-home supportive services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 100 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 100.
You're tracking AB 100
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 100 — Medi-Cal: managed care: long-term services and supports: in-home supportive services.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to seek federal approval to establish a demonstration project as described in law pursuant to a Medicare or a Medicaid demonstration project or waiver, or a combination thereof. Existing law provides that if the department has not received by February 1, 2013, federal approval, or notification indicating pending approval, of a mutual ratesetting process, shared federal savings, and a 6-month enrollment period in the demonstration project, effective March 1, 2013, Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012, and specified provisions of Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012, are inoperative, as provided. Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012, among other things, requires that Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have dual eligibility in the Medi-Cal and Medicare programs be assigned as mandatory enrollees into managed care plans in counties participating in the demonstration project, and requires that no sooner than March 1, 2013, all Medi-Cal long-term services and supports, which includes Multipurpose Senior Services Program (MSSP) services, be covered under managed care plan contracts and only available through managed care plans to beneficiaries residing in counties participating in the demonstration project. Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012, among other things, establishes the California In-Home Supportive Services Authority (Statewide Authority) , and provides that the In-Home Supportive Services Program is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health care plans in specified counties, as specified. Existing law provides that no sooner than March 1, 2103, the Statewide Authority shall assume specified responsibilities in a county or city and county upon notification by the Director of Health Care Services that the enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries described in specified provisions of law has been completed in that county or city and county. This bill would instead require enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries into managed care pursuant to the demonstration project or other specified provisions, including managed care for long-term services and supports, as one of the conditions that would be required to be completed before the Statewide Authority assumes the specified responsibilities. The bill would modify the provisions governing when MSSP becomes a Medi-Cal benefit only through managed care health plans, as prescribed. The bill would delete the provision authorizing the Director of Health Care Services to forgo the provision of long-term services and supports only through managed care, in its entirety or partially, if and to the extent the director determines that the quality of care for managed care beneficiaries, efficiency, or cost-effectiveness of the program would be jeopardized. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to convene quarterly meetings with stakeholders to make recommendations regarding the Coordinated Care Initiative, as specified. The bill would require that in Coordinated Care Initiative Counties for managed care health plans providing long-term services and supports, the department shall include in its contract with those plans risk corridors to provide protections against either significant overpayment or significant underpayments. The bill would also repeal the provisions conditioning the operation of Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012 and specified provisions of Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012 on receipt of federal approval or notification of pending approval by February 1, 2013. The bill would instead condition implementation of the Coordinated Care Initiative, as defined, on whether the Director of Finance estimates that the Coordinated Care Initiative will generate net General Fund savings, as specified. The bill would also make other related technical, nonsubstantive changes. (2) The bill would appropriate the amount of $500,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for the Coordinated Care Initiative for purposes of notifying dual eligible beneficiaries and providers regarding the provisions of this act, and would provide that those funds be available for encumbrance and expenditure until June 30, 2014. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/13/13 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 13, 2013
- Introduced 01/10/13 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2013
- AB100 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Leno.
-
Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1363.)
-
(Ayes 24. Noes 6. Page 1361.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1402.)
-
(Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1314.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
(Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1312.)
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 24 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 100 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to seek federal approval to establish a demonstration project as described in law pursuant to a Medicare or a Medicaid demonstration project or waiver, or a combination thereof. Existing law provides that if the department has not received by February 1, 2013, federal approval, or notification indicating pending approval, of a mutual ratesetting process, shared federal savings, and a 6-month enrollment period in the demonstration project, effective March 1, 2013, Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012, and specified provisions of Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012, are inoperative, as provided. Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012, among other things, requires that Medi-Cal beneficiaries who have dual eligibility in the Medi-Cal and Medicare programs be assigned as mandatory enrollees into managed care plans in counties participating in the demonstration project, and requires that no sooner than March 1, 2013, all Medi-Cal long-term services and supports, which includes Multipurpose Senior Services Program (MSSP) services, be covered under managed care plan contracts and only available through managed care plans to beneficiaries residing in counties participating in the demonstration project. Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012, among other things, establishes the California In-Home Supportive Services Authority (Statewide Authority) , and provides that the In-Home Supportive Services Program is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health care plans in specified counties, as specified. Existing law provides that no sooner than March 1, 2103, the Statewide Authority shall assume specified responsibilities in a county or city and county upon notification by the Director of Health Care Services that the enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries described in specified provisions of law has been completed in that county or city and county. This bill would instead require enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries into managed care pursuant to the demonstration project or other specified provisions, including managed care for long-term services and supports, as one of the conditions that would be required to be completed before the Statewide Authority assumes the specified responsibilities. The bill would modify the provisions governing when MSSP becomes a Medi-Cal benefit only through managed care health plans, as prescribed. The bill would delete the provision authorizing the Director of Health Care Services to forgo the provision of long-term services and supports only through managed care, in its entirety or partially, if and to the extent the director determines that the quality of care for managed care beneficiaries, efficiency, or cost-effectiveness of the program would be jeopardized. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to convene quarterly meetings with stakeholders to make recommendations regarding the Coordinated Care Initiative, as specified. The bill would require that in Coordinated Care Initiative Counties for managed care health plans providing long-term services and supports, the department shall include in its contract with those plans risk corridors to provide protections against either significant overpayment or significant underpayments. The bill would also repeal the provisions conditioning the operation of Chapter 45 of the Statutes of 2012 and specified provisions of Chapter 33 of the Statutes of 2012 on receipt of federal approval or notification of pending approval by February 1, 2013. The bill would instead condition implementation of the Coordinated Care Initiative, as defined, on whether the Director of Finance estimates that the Coordinated Care Initiative will generate net General Fund savings, as specified. The bill would also make other related technical, nonsubstantive changes. (2) The bill would appropriate the amount of $500,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for the Coordinated Care Initiative for purposes of notifying dual eligible beneficiaries and providers regarding the provisions of this act, and would provide that those funds be available for encumbrance and expenditure until June 30, 2014. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors AB 100?
- AB 100 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
- What is the current status of AB 100?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 100?
- Track AB 100 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 100
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 100
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →