California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 162 — Prisoners: temporary removal.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 56, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Under existing law, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation may authorize the temporary removal of any inmate from prison or any other institution for the detention of adults under the jurisdiction of the department. Existing law authorizes the superior court, when it is necessary to have a prisoner brought before any court to be tried for a felony, or for other limited purposes, to order the prisoner's temporary removal from prison, and the prisoner's production before the court, grand jury, or magistrate. Existing law additionally authorizes the superior court, when the testimony of a material witness is required in a criminal action and the witness is a prisoner in the state prison, to order the prisoner's temporary removal from prison, and the prisoner's production before the court, grand jury, or magistrate. This bill would authorize the superior court to order the temporary removal of a prisoner from a state prison facility, and his or her transportation to a county or city jail, if a legitimate law enforcement purpose exists to move the prisoner. The bill would authorize the order to be issued, at the discretion of the court, upon a finding of good cause in an affidavit by the requesting district attorney or peace officer, as specified. The bill would make the expense of executing the order a proper charge against, and require payment by, the county in which the order is made. The bill would provide that the state is not liable for any claim of damage, or for the injury or death of any person, including a prisoner, that occurs during the period in which the prisoner is in the exclusive control of a local law enforcement agency.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 56, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2132.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  7. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18).

  8. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  9. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 808.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Ordered to second reading.

  13. Read third time and amended.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 665.) (April 23).

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. Set for hearing April 23.

  18. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.

  19. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 6.

  20. Read first time.

  21. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Lieu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Lieu

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 162 Lieu Consent Calendar Second Day

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 64004
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 75004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Holden — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Linder — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fox — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32003
Democratic 3000
Total 35003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Liu — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Knight — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 162 do?
Under existing law, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation may authorize the temporary removal of any inmate from prison or any other institution for the detention of adults under the jurisdiction of the department. Existing law authorizes the superior court, when it is necessary to have a prisoner brought before any court to be tried for a felony, or for other limited purposes, to order the prisoner's temporary removal from prison, and the prisoner's production before the court, grand jury, or magistrate. Existing law additionally authorizes the superior court, when the testimony of a material witness is required in a criminal action and the witness is a prisoner in the state prison, to order the prisoner's temporary removal from prison, and the prisoner's production before the court, grand jury, or magistrate. This bill would authorize the superior court to order the temporary removal of a prisoner from a state prison facility, and his or her transportation to a county or city jail, if a legitimate law enforcement purpose exists to move the prisoner. The bill would authorize the order to be issued, at the discretion of the court, upon a finding of good cause in an affidavit by the requesting district attorney or peace officer, as specified. The bill would make the expense of executing the order a proper charge against, and require payment by, the county in which the order is made. The bill would provide that the state is not liable for any claim of damage, or for the injury or death of any person, including a prisoner, that occurs during the period in which the prisoner is in the exclusive control of a local law enforcement agency.
Who sponsors SB 162?
SB 162 is sponsored by Lieu.
What is the current status of SB 162?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 162?
Track SB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 162

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 162

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →