AB 484 — Pupil assessments: Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP).
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 489, Statutes of 2013.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) to measure the performance of schools and school districts, especially the academic performance of pupils. Existing law, the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act, requires the Superintendent to design and implement a statewide pupil assessment program, and requires school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, certain achievement tests, including a standards-based achievement test pursuant to the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program and the California Standards Tests. Existing law makes the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act inoperative on July 1, 2014, and repeals it on January 1, 2015. Existing federal law, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, contains provisions generally requiring states to adopt performance goals for their public elementary and secondary schools, and to demonstrate that these public schools are making adequate yearly progress, as measured by pupil performance on standardized tests as well as other measures, to satisfy those goals. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop the California Standards Tests, to measure the degree to which pupils are achieving academically rigorous content standards and performance standards, as provided. Existing law, the Early Assessment Program, establishes a collaborative effort, headed by the California State University, to enable pupils to learn about their readiness for college-level English and mathematics before their senior year of high school. This bill would, for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 school years, upon approval of the state board, authorize the Superintendent to not provide an API score to a school or school district due to a determination by the Superintendent that a transition to new standards-based assessments would compromise comparability of results across schools or school districts. The bill would extend the duration of the provisions of the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act by 6 years so that they would become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and be repealed on January 1, 2021. The bill would delete the provisions establishing the STAR Program, and instead establish the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP) , commencing with the 2013–14 school year, for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils. The bill would specify that the MAPP would be composed of: a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, as specified; science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10, measuring specified content standards; the California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, as specified; and the Early Assessment Program. The bill would specify numerous policies and procedures with respect to the development and the implementation of the MAPP by the Superintendent, the state board, and affected local educational agencies. This bill would, commencing with the 2014–15 school year and for purposes of the Early Assessment Program, authorize the replacement of the California Standards Test and the augmented California Standards Tests in English language arts and mathematics with the grade 11 consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics, as provided. This bill would make conforming and other related changes and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 52052 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 344, to be operative only if SB 344 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 99301 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 490, to be operative only if SB 490 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/02/13 - Chaptered Current pdf October 02, 2013
- Enrolled 09/16/13 - Enrolled pdf September 16, 2013
- Amended 09/06/13 - Amended Senate pdf September 06, 2013
- Amended 09/04/13 - Amended Senate pdf September 04, 2013
- Amended 07/03/13 - Amended Senate pdf July 03, 2013
- Amended 06/17/13 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2013
- Amended 05/24/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 24, 2013
- Amended 04/24/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 24, 2013
- Amended 04/17/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 17, 2013
- Introduced 02/19/13 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2013
- AB484 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 489, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:45 a.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 22. Page 3206.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3195.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 7. Page 2312.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 26).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 16. Page 1751.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 24).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bonilla · Primary
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bonilla
Co-sponsors (1)
- Steinberg
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 19 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 28% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 18% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 16 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 18% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 484 do?
- Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) to measure the performance of schools and school districts, especially the academic performance of pupils. Existing law, the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act, requires the Superintendent to design and implement a statewide pupil assessment program, and requires school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, certain achievement tests, including a standards-based achievement test pursuant to the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program and the California Standards Tests. Existing law makes the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act inoperative on July 1, 2014, and repeals it on January 1, 2015. Existing federal law, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, contains provisions generally requiring states to adopt performance goals for their public elementary and secondary schools, and to demonstrate that these public schools are making adequate yearly progress, as measured by pupil performance on standardized tests as well as other measures, to satisfy those goals. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop the California Standards Tests, to measure the degree to which pupils are achieving academically rigorous content standards and performance standards, as provided. Existing law, the Early Assessment Program, establishes a collaborative effort, headed by the California State University, to enable pupils to learn about their readiness for college-level English and mathematics before their senior year of high school. This bill would, for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 school years, upon approval of the state board, authorize the Superintendent to not provide an API score to a school or school district due to a determination by the Superintendent that a transition to new standards-based assessments would compromise comparability of results across schools or school districts. The bill would extend the duration of the provisions of the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act by 6 years so that they would become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and be repealed on January 1, 2021. The bill would delete the provisions establishing the STAR Program, and instead establish the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP) , commencing with the 2013–14 school year, for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils. The bill would specify that the MAPP would be composed of: a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, as specified; science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10, measuring specified content standards; the California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, as specified; and the Early Assessment Program. The bill would specify numerous policies and procedures with respect to the development and the implementation of the MAPP by the Superintendent, the state board, and affected local educational agencies. This bill would, commencing with the 2014–15 school year and for purposes of the Early Assessment Program, authorize the replacement of the California Standards Test and the augmented California Standards Tests in English language arts and mathematics with the grade 11 consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics, as provided. This bill would make conforming and other related changes and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 52052 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 344, to be operative only if SB 344 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 99301 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 490, to be operative only if SB 490 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
- Who sponsors AB 484?
- AB 484 is sponsored by Bonilla and Steinberg.
- What is the current status of AB 484?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 484?
- Track AB 484 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 484
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 484
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →