California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 484 — Pupil assessments: Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP).

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 489, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) to measure the performance of schools and school districts, especially the academic performance of pupils. Existing law, the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act, requires the Superintendent to design and implement a statewide pupil assessment program, and requires school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, certain achievement tests, including a standards-based achievement test pursuant to the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program and the California Standards Tests. Existing law makes the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act inoperative on July 1, 2014, and repeals it on January 1, 2015. Existing federal law, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, contains provisions generally requiring states to adopt performance goals for their public elementary and secondary schools, and to demonstrate that these public schools are making adequate yearly progress, as measured by pupil performance on standardized tests as well as other measures, to satisfy those goals. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop the California Standards Tests, to measure the degree to which pupils are achieving academically rigorous content standards and performance standards, as provided. Existing law, the Early Assessment Program, establishes a collaborative effort, headed by the California State University, to enable pupils to learn about their readiness for college-level English and mathematics before their senior year of high school. This bill would, for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 school years, upon approval of the state board, authorize the Superintendent to not provide an API score to a school or school district due to a determination by the Superintendent that a transition to new standards-based assessments would compromise comparability of results across schools or school districts. The bill would extend the duration of the provisions of the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act by 6 years so that they would become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and be repealed on January 1, 2021. The bill would delete the provisions establishing the STAR Program, and instead establish the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP) , commencing with the 2013–14 school year, for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils. The bill would specify that the MAPP would be composed of: a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, as specified; science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10, measuring specified content standards; the California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, as specified; and the Early Assessment Program. The bill would specify numerous policies and procedures with respect to the development and the implementation of the MAPP by the Superintendent, the state board, and affected local educational agencies. This bill would, commencing with the 2014–15 school year and for purposes of the Early Assessment Program, authorize the replacement of the California Standards Test and the augmented California Standards Tests in English language arts and mathematics with the grade 11 consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics, as provided. This bill would make conforming and other related changes and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 52052 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 344, to be operative only if SB 344 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 99301 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 490, to be operative only if SB 490 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 489, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:45 a.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 22. Page 3206.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3195.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 7. Page 2312.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).

  12. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 26).

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

  16. Referred to Com. on ED.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 16. Page 1751.).

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 24).

  22. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Com. on ED.

  29. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  30. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bonilla · Primary
  • Steinberg · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Bonilla

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Steinberg

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 54 Yea · 22 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 501902
Democratic 4000
Republican 0300
Total 542202
% of votes cast 69%28%0%3%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Salas — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Allen — Nay
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 26 Yea · 7 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23706
Democratic 3000
Total 26706
% of votes cast 67%18%0%15%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Emmerson — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Knight — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 55 Yea · 16 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 491207
Democratic 6001
Republican 0400
Total 551608
% of votes cast 70%20%0%10%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Stone — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Medina — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Holden — Not Voting
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Campos — Yea
Logue — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11302
Democratic 1000
Total 12302
% of votes cast 71%18%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Linder — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 484 do?
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) to measure the performance of schools and school districts, especially the academic performance of pupils. Existing law, the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act, requires the Superintendent to design and implement a statewide pupil assessment program, and requires school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, certain achievement tests, including a standards-based achievement test pursuant to the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program and the California Standards Tests. Existing law makes the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act inoperative on July 1, 2014, and repeals it on January 1, 2015. Existing federal law, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, contains provisions generally requiring states to adopt performance goals for their public elementary and secondary schools, and to demonstrate that these public schools are making adequate yearly progress, as measured by pupil performance on standardized tests as well as other measures, to satisfy those goals. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop the California Standards Tests, to measure the degree to which pupils are achieving academically rigorous content standards and performance standards, as provided. Existing law, the Early Assessment Program, establishes a collaborative effort, headed by the California State University, to enable pupils to learn about their readiness for college-level English and mathematics before their senior year of high school. This bill would, for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 school years, upon approval of the state board, authorize the Superintendent to not provide an API score to a school or school district due to a determination by the Superintendent that a transition to new standards-based assessments would compromise comparability of results across schools or school districts. The bill would extend the duration of the provisions of the Leroy Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act by 6 years so that they would become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and be repealed on January 1, 2021. The bill would delete the provisions establishing the STAR Program, and instead establish the Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (MAPP) , commencing with the 2013–14 school year, for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils. The bill would specify that the MAPP would be composed of: a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, as specified; science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10, measuring specified content standards; the California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, as specified; and the Early Assessment Program. The bill would specify numerous policies and procedures with respect to the development and the implementation of the MAPP by the Superintendent, the state board, and affected local educational agencies. This bill would, commencing with the 2014–15 school year and for purposes of the Early Assessment Program, authorize the replacement of the California Standards Test and the augmented California Standards Tests in English language arts and mathematics with the grade 11 consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics, as provided. This bill would make conforming and other related changes and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 52052 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 344, to be operative only if SB 344 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 99301 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 490, to be operative only if SB 490 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 484?
AB 484 is sponsored by Bonilla and Steinberg.
What is the current status of AB 484?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 484?
Track AB 484 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 484

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 484

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →